https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/109/--
[...truncated 1127 lines...]
CXX insets/InsetGraphicsParams.o
CXX insets/InsetGraphics.o
CXX insets/InsetHyperlink.o
CXX insets/InsetIncl
On 7 March 2017 at 11:23, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> The next natural step could be to use your CI stuff to update our coverity
> builds:
> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/4164
>
> Currently the build are submitted by hand by Liviu or recently by myself.
> There is plenty
On 18 March 2017 at 16:46, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Christian, does the check start from a fresh tree? If you do 'make
>> clean' and the rules have changed, it might be that some .o files remain
>> at the wrong place
>>
>
> I think most CI jobs are configured to start from a completely empt
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/108/--
[...truncated 1127 lines...]
CXX insets/InsetGraphicsParams.o
CXX insets/InsetGraphics.o
CXX insets/InsetHyperlink.o
CXX insets/InsetIncl
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 06:09:32PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 12:54:44PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > What is the difference between the following two (the second removes the
> > prepended "env")?
> >
> > env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/mylibs prog
>
> This
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 05:49:30PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 18/03/2017 à 17:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:01:23AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > I have a patch and it seems to work well. I want to clean it up before
> > > posting. I will post
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 12:54:44PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> What is the difference between the following two (the second removes the
> prepended "env")?
>
> env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/mylibs prog
This works whatever your shell.
> and
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/mylibs prog
Thi
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 05:43:10PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:56:25AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 08:26:05AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, this is sufficient.
> > > If you want to switch more often, you should create a
Le 18/03/2017 à 17:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:01:23AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I have a patch and it seems to work well. I want to clean it up before
posting. I will post it again for review because even though it seems to
work well, I wonder if there is a cle
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:56:25AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 08:26:05AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Yes, this is sufficient.
> > If you want to switch more often, you should create a script.
> > I have a symbolic link, /usr/BUILD/BuildQt, pointing to the correct
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:41:20PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-03-18, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> > I think we have to make do with the ugly zero-space inset.
>
> >> Or special/invisible unicode characters
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:01:23AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I have a patch and it seems to work well. I want to clean it up before
> posting. I will post it again for review because even though it seems to
> work well, I wonder if there is a cleaner way of doing it. I will post
> a cleaned
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 08:26:05AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Yes, this is sufficient.
> If you want to switch more often, you should create a script.
> I have a symbolic link, /usr/BUILD/BuildQt, pointing to the correct QT.
> And in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/qt5.conf the first line reads
> /usr/B
On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 at 21:10, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 15/03/2017 à 12:12, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Probably some automake failure. Using old
> ./src/support/tests/dummy_functions.o in the build dir.
> > Removing that file, it will be rebuild with
> > make check-recursive
> > and
On 2017-03-18, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
...
>> > I think we have to make do with the ugly zero-space inset.
>> Or special/invisible unicode characters could be made visible by changing
>> the character before painting.
> However
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 18/03/2017 à 14:59, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:12:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >
> > > Apparently, nobody has a preference, so I am going to commit the
> > > second patch, i.e., the o
Le 18/03/2017 à 14:59, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:12:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Apparently, nobody has a preference, so I am going to commit the
second patch, i.e., the one using a zero-width space character.
On second thoughts, I am not sure this is the
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:12:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> Apparently, nobody has a preference, so I am going to commit the
> second patch, i.e., the one using a zero-width space character.
On second thoughts, I am not sure this is the best choice. I just
verified that this character
Am Samstag, 18. März 2017 um 00:23:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:47:31PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 22:29:58, schrieb Kornel Benko
> > > Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 14:47:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017
19 matches
Mail list logo
