Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> I reran diff with the -u flag and am attaching the result.
>
> Regarding the positioning of the X-Apps entries in the lists, that may need
> some discussion. I'm not sure end of the list always works. I assume the
My understanding of your issue was that suddenly
>> I have two questions today, after examining the DocBook XML output
>> from the 2.2.x series.
>
>You might want to read http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7009
I see.
>I believe if someone competent told us (hint) what we are supposed
>to output, the patch to port docbook for something up-to-dat
Richard,
>> I have used LyX on and off for many years and, working
>> sporadically with TLDP [0], I have handled a few documents that
>> were written in LyX. Thank you to the LyX team for your work on
>> this tool over the years.
>>
>> I have two questions today, after examining the DocBook X
On 2017-01-07, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 07.01.2017, 18:40 +0100 schrieb Guillaume Munch:
>> If you are ready to alter the style combo-box temporarily, then two
>> pairs of bindings should be enough too, isn't it?
> No. Because I can alter the combo box to more than two values
Martin A. Brown wrote:
> I have two questions today, after examining the DocBook XML output
> from the 2.2.x series.
You mmight want to read http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7009
I believe if someone competent told us (hint) what we are supposed
to output, the patch to port docbook for something u
Am Samstag, den 07.01.2017, 19:58 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > I tested the latest GUI-related commit and I have a bug to report.
> > Create a new document, Language: French, Quotes style: language
> > default.
> > Close and reopen the properties. Then instead of language default,
> > here
Am Samstag, den 07.01.2017, 18:40 +0100 schrieb Guillaume Munch:
> If you are ready to alter the style combo-box temporarily, then two
> pairs of bindings should be enough too, isn't it?
No. Because I can alter the combo box to more than two values
temporarily.
> The only thing that
> still worr
On 01/07/2017 12:46 PM, Martin A. Brown wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have used LyX on and off for many years and, working sporadically with TLDP
> [0], I have handled a few documents that were written in LyX. Thank you to
> the LyX team for your work on this tool over the years.
>
> I have two ques
Hello all,
I have used LyX on and off for many years and, working sporadically
with TLDP [0], I have handled a few documents that were written in
LyX. Thank you to the LyX team for your work on this tool over the
years.
I have two questions today, after examining the DocBook XML output
from
Le 05/01/2017 à 06:39, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, den 04.01.2017, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Guillaume Munch:
There I do not follow anymore: if without the checkbox you would need
12
key bindings, how is the checkbox helping? Or do you mean that even
the
checkbox does not address your ne
On 07/01/2017 03:09, Richard Heck wrote:
My question is: did you work out why this for() loop is here if it does
not have any effect?
sorry guys to chime in so late, according to the original comment from the
very first patch below:
// Try all possible regexp matches, until one that v
On 05/01/2017 20:15, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
According to
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10937597/security-risks-of-gnuplot-web-interface
,
gnuplot can be built "safer" by disabling pipe operations. That leaves the
unsafe commands "shell", "system" and "!", but a simple shell
12 matches
Mail list logo
