Re: checkbox to filter font list by document language

2016-06-04 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 02/06/2016 20:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 02/06/16 à 20:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : You are right, LyX deserves a better font selection dialog. I had a quick look: there is the QFontDialog widget which has a writing system selection menu. See https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qfontdialog.htm

Re: Require C++11 for 2.3?

2016-06-04 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 03/06/2016 06:24, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Dear all, Are we going to require C++11 starting with LyX 2.3.0? From what I understand, this will make several things easier. Scott Apart from Boost features and smart pointers from the other message, two areas come to mind: * char32_t and Uni

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2016 um 15:36:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:40:59PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I'm still not sure what the implications of moving to CMake as our > > > official build system are (I should have made this more clear in my

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:40:59PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I'm still not sure what the implications of moving to CMake as our > > official build system are (I should have made this more clear in my > > To start with: If you make tarball with autotools and cmake is th

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 07:55:28PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > > > Am 04.06.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Liviu Andronic : > > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Georg Baum > > wrote: > >> One thing I noticed recently is the > >> version suffix: Which autotools you can use an arbitrary one, with cmake

Re: [LyX/master] Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings

2016-06-04 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/04/2016 01:28 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> OK, please commit to 2.2.x. (Safe enough, yes?) > Done. Yes, it is safe. And even if something went wrong you would now see it > in the diffs when sommitting .po files: The only visible diffs should now be > changed line numbers

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Stephan Witt
> Am 04.06.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Liviu Andronic : > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Georg Baum > wrote: >> One thing I noticed recently is the >> version suffix: Which autotools you can use an arbitrary one, with cmake you >> can only toggle between a predefined one or none at all, which is a

Re: [LyX/master] Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings

2016-06-04 Thread Georg Baum
Georg Baum wrote: > commit 960bcc71c18b21e0444cfce3d9a5e7c10cb3172a > Author: Georg Baum > Date: Sat Jun 4 17:33:19 2016 +0200 > > Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings > > cmake sorts the input files for lyx_pot.py internally, but autotools > use a shell pattern like

Re: [LyX/master] Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings

2016-06-04 Thread Georg Baum
Richard Heck wrote: > OK, please commit to 2.2.x. (Safe enough, yes?) Done. Yes, it is safe. And even if something went wrong you would now see it in the diffs when sommitting .po files: The only visible diffs should now be changed line numbers in source files, and of course added, changed or

Re: [LyX/master] Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings

2016-06-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
Georg Baum wrote: > Together with 9df45c383ad this should now fix all pseudo-diff problems we > had with .po file generation. Nice! P

Re: [LyX/master] Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings

2016-06-04 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/04/2016 11:54 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > >> commit 960bcc71c18b21e0444cfce3d9a5e7c10cb3172a >> Author: Georg Baum >> Date: Sat Jun 4 17:33:19 2016 +0200 >> >> Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings >> >> cmake sorts the input files for lyx_pot.py inter

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 04/06/2016 10:18, Georg Baum wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hi Guys, Funny to discover that the same discussion is coming back every couple of years :-) I am not surprised at all, maintaining two build systems with such a small amount of developers is simply stupid. I agree. The main

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2016 um 10:15:03, schrieb Liviu Andronic > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Georg Baum > wrote: > > One thing I noticed recently is the > > version suffix: Which autotools you can use an arbitrary one, with cmake you > > can only toggle between a predefined one or none at all,

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2016 um 09:55:10, schrieb Georg Baum > Richard Heck wrote: > > > On 06/03/2016 04:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:38:09PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > >>> Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016 um 12:42:33, schrieb Richard Heck > >>> > I guess maybe ther

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Georg Baum
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Funny to discover that the same discussion is coming back every couple > of years :-) I am not surprised at all, maintaining two build systems with such a small amount of developers is simply stupid. > I think the only point to discuss is the GLOB functi

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > One thing I noticed recently is the > version suffix: Which autotools you can use an arbitrary one, with cmake you > can only toggle between a predefined one or none at all, which is a problem > if you want to compare two different builds of the

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Georg Baum
Richard Heck wrote: > On 06/03/2016 04:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:38:09PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >>> Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016 um 12:42:33, schrieb Richard Heck >>> I guess maybe there is a question worth discussing here about how many of us understan

Re: SVG display on LyX appears corrupted on the 2.2RC1 Windows build

2016-06-04 Thread Georg Baum
Guillaume Munch wrote: > Do you want to commit? Thanks for the reminder, it is in now at 6bd5263405340b. Georg

Re: [LyX/master] Do not duplicate jpg format

2016-06-04 Thread Georg Baum
Guillaume Munch wrote: > Why not just using a set instead of a vector if this is important? I believe that the order matters. We prefer the first format that is reachable with a converter. With the current solution, qt can give a preference, if we used a set then we would prefer the first in al

Re: One official build system?

2016-06-04 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Hi Guys, Funny to discover that the same discussion is coming back every couple of years :-) On 03/06/2016 22:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 03/06/16 à 18:42, Richard Heck a écrit : Same here. I am used to autotools, so I use it. I have reservations about cmake, but I would have some a