Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I will kick it out of the page once back home.
Should be fixed now.
> Pavel
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 06:27:17PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 03/21/2015 05:59 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> > > On 03/16/2015 07:43 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > 2. version. Currently it defaults to 2.1.3. I propose to have it
> >
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:00:20AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> There are 2 large security holes in ImageMagick (and also GraphicsMagick)
> that have been fixed:
> (article in German:
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Luecke-in-ImageMagick-und-GraphicsMagick-ermoeglicht-erneute-Angriffe-322381
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Try to click on a Mac OS X link for instance. It seems related to
>> oswatershed, probably their domain expired and something weird is going
>> on.
>
> I cannot reproduce any problems. All Mac OS links for for me.
I can reproduce it. We used watershed to display snippet of avai
Am 02.06.2016 um 01:38 schrieb Alessandro Di Federico:
Hi, long time no see, since the last (?) dev meeting in Milan.
Hi Alessandro,
nice to hear from you again. You do a great job with the LyX courses!
http://www.lyx.org/Download
Try to click on a Mac OS X link for instance. It seems rela
There are 2 large security holes in ImageMagick (and also
GraphicsMagick) that have been fixed:
(article in German:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Luecke-in-ImageMagick-und-GraphicsMagick-ermoeglicht-erneute-Angriffe-3223811.html)
I therefore decided to release a new installer for LyX 2
Hi, long time no see, since the last (?) dev meeting in Milan.
A friend of mine told me about a popunder page which opens up when you
click on a download on the download page:
http://www.lyx.org/Download
Try to click on a Mac OS X link for instance. It seems related to
oswatershed, probably thei
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:04:12PM +, Michael Maltenfort wrote:
> I'm sorry to have been remiss in following up on this issue.
> By the end of this month, I will download the new version of LyX and test
> things out.
> ---Michael Maltenfort
No problem, Michael. Thanks for getting back in touc
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:35:48PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> There are currently only 3 articles about our new release:
>
> in German:
> -
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/LyX-2-2-0-LaTeX-fuer-hochaufloesende-Displays-und-Qt-5-3223721.html
> -
> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/23600/latex
Georg Baum wrote:
> > I just blindly copied what was there for other on-off packages, because
> > I have little clue what tex2lyx code does and zero comments in critical
> > sections does not help. I know it's not your fault ;)
>
> Actually the other packages are not on-off, they are off-auto-on.
PhilipPirrip wrote:
> Even Fonts section should be OK, as this makes use and/or changes features
> of individual glyphs and whole fonts.
Yes, my life would be easier then. But no hard opinion on the issue.
> Speaking of this: why is "Use justification in LyX work area" in Text
> Layout of Docum
Le 01/06/16 à 18:34, Richard Heck a écrit :
I hope to do the 2.1.5 release in a week or so. Once that's been done,
and if nothing really bad has appeared in the meanwhile, then we let's
merge 2.2.2-staging and move towards a 2.2.1 release.
OK. Shall I cherry-pick c8e1c09236 to stable althouhg i
On 06/01/2016 02:12 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Anyway would you like to see it in text or page layout?
Between these two, I say: Text layout definitely!
Even Fonts section should be OK, as this makes use and/or changes
features of individual glyphs and whole fonts.
Microtype isn't ONLY about how
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I just blindly copied what was there for other on-off packages, because
> I have little clue what tex2lyx code does and zero comments in critical
> sections does not help. I know it's not your fault ;)
Actually the other packages are not on-off, they are off-auto-on. This is
There are currently only 3 articles about our new release:
in German:
-
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/LyX-2-2-0-LaTeX-fuer-hochaufloesende-Displays-und-Qt-5-3223721.html
-
http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/23600/latex-wysiwym-editor-lyx-22-unterst%C3%BCtzt-qt-56.html
in Dutch:
- http://
Am 01.06.2016 um 18:34 schrieb Richard Heck:
I hope to do the 2.1.5 release in a week or so.
For information: I cannot provide an installer from June 9th to 19th. So
a release before would be fine if possible.
Once that's been done,
and if nothing really bad has appeared in the meanwhile,
On 06/01/2016 03:08 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> commit 4eb3ed96e53ab0eb2af519caa6125cac79c823ad
>> Author: Richard Heck
>> Date: Wed Jun 1 12:31:48 2016 -0400
>>
>> Update lyx2lyx from 2.2.0. This is in preparation for the 2.1.5
>> release.
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/lyx
Georg Baum wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> @@ -813,7 +814,7 @@ void Preamble::handle_package(Parser &p, string const
> >> & name,
> >> else if (name == "amsmath" || name == "amssymb" || name == "cancel" ||
> >> name == "esint" || name == "mhchem" || name == "mathdots" |
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> @@ -813,7 +814,7 @@ void Preamble::handle_package(Parser &p, string const
>> & name,
>> else if (name == "amsmath" || name == "amssymb" || name == "cancel" ||
>> name == "esint" || name == "mhchem" || name == "mathdots" ||
>> name == "mathtools" || nam
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> diff --git a/src/tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp b/src/tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp
> index 24c403d..95212ae 100644
> --- a/src/tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp
> +++ b/src/tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp
> @@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ Preamble::Preamble() : one_language(true),
> explicit_babel(false),
> h_use_packages["
Richard Heck wrote:
> commit 4eb3ed96e53ab0eb2af519caa6125cac79c823ad
> Author: Richard Heck
> Date: Wed Jun 1 12:31:48 2016 -0400
>
> Update lyx2lyx from 2.2.0. This is in preparation for the 2.1.5
> release.
>
> diff --git a/lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py b/lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py
> index 7e52238..1
On 01.06.16 16:21, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-06-01, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>
>> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
>
>> 2016-06-01 11:43 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
>>> Do not use LateXisms in the GUI -- we just got rid of "Use longtable".
>
>>> Instead of "Use mi
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> BTW, character protusion and font expansion are not so much a font
> property, but a page layout property.
I guess its both. Anyway would you like to see it in text or page layout?
Pavel
On 06/01/2016 08:02 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 31/05/2016 à 23:20, Richard Heck a écrit :
>>> Since it is a regression and the patch is simple, this could actually
>>> be candidate for branch right now, Richard.
>>
>> Sure, looks safe enough.
>
> Which leads me to the question: do we real
I'm sorry to have been remiss in following up on this issue.
By the end of this month, I will download the new version of LyX and test
things out.
---Michael Maltenfort
From: LyX Ticket Tracker
To: maltenf...@yahoo.com; lasgout...@lyx.org
Cc: for...@lyx.org; sp...@lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday
On 2016-06-01, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> 2016-06-01 11:43 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>> Do not use LateXisms in the GUI -- we just got rid of "Use longtable".
>> Instead of "Use microtype", the GUI should be something like "Enable
>>
Le 31/05/2016 à 23:20, Richard Heck a écrit :
Since it is a regression and the patch is simple, this could actually
be candidate for branch right now, Richard.
Sure, looks safe enough.
Which leads me to the question: do we really expect that there will be a
urgent 2.2.1 release? What about m
2016-06-01 11:43 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Do not use LateXisms in the GUI -- we just got rid of "Use longtable".
>
> Instead of "Use microtype", the GUI should be something like "Enable
> micro-typographic extensions"
>
> And the tooltip:
>
> "Activates micro-typographic extensions such as
2016-06-01 11:02 GMT+02:00 Pavel Sanda :
> So updated patch for master. I decided to make fileformat change
> instead of module.
>
> Will commit unless there are some comments.
>
Do not use LateXisms in the GUI -- we just got rid of "Use longtable".
Instead of "Use microtype", the GUI should be
So updated patch for master. I decided to make fileformat change
instead of module.
Will commit unless there are some comments.
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
> > I got the same impression after some tests with a *.tex file here.
> > This is also what the documentation tells: it works
avel Sanda wrote:
> commit b356df7fcf8b1970a1767138d0fa287114b6cea3
> Author: Pavel Sanda
> Date: Wed Jun 1 00:20:50 2016 -0700
>
> glitch in lfundoc
Hi Juergen,
I don't know whether it was your intention, but it seems that part of Hidden
lfuns is no more generated correctly and some lfun
31 matches
Mail list logo
