Re: new installer for LyX 2.1.4 available

2016-05-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 26.05.2016 um 16:07 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: everything is now ready. Please put the new installer for LyX 2.1.4 to the ftp server: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.1.4/ I uploaded there version a new version 7 of the installer for 2.1.4 to avoid confusions the the version 6 that I released more than a

Re: retracting the installer: was: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

2016-05-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 27.05.2016 um 01:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I will try to release a new version withing 2 hours or so. It was more tricky than I thought. However, I solved the problems and uploaded a new version: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ sorry and regards Uwe

Re: retracting the installer: was: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

2016-05-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:30:03PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 26.05.2016 um 16:05 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > > Here it is: > > http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ > > As always a release without testing is very bad. I only had an hour but > fortunately have now time to test it and there are some errors

retracting the installer: was: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

2016-05-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 26.05.2016 um 16:05 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Here it is: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ As always a release without testing is very bad. I only had an hour but fortunately have now time to test it and there are some errors and mistakes if Lyx is installed the first time and without admin privi

Re: Using xmllint to test our LyXHTML export

2016-05-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2016 um 16:48:58, schrieb Kornel Benko > > Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016 um 18:03:27, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:55:59PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > > > On 2016-05-23, Kornel Benk

Re: Handling of \SpecialChar

2016-05-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 02:17:11PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 1:39:56 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I'm still curious someone has thoughts on the above idea. The main > > question I have is do we usually know when we are not producing > > equivalent documents

Re: Wrong file path in MergedMauals.lyx

2016-05-26 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2016 um 16:30:28, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 07:00:37PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Subject says it all. > > Commit? > > Yes, to 2.3-staging I think. It is actually in a LyX note along with > another example file. I'm not sure why they are in

Re: Wrong file path in MergedMauals.lyx

2016-05-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 07:00:37PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Subject says it all. > Commit? Yes, to 2.3-staging I think. It is actually in a LyX note along with another example file. I'm not sure why they are in MergedManuals.lyx. Scott > > Kornel > diff --git a/lib/doc/MergedMa

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

2016-05-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 04:05:24PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 25.05.2016 um 00:29 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > > Despite of the warning the compilation run fine and I have an installer > > ready. > > Here it is: > http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ Thanks they are uploaded. > It contains the fresh MiKT

Wrong file path in MergedMauals.lyx

2016-05-26 Thread Kornel Benko
Subject says it all. Commit? Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. diff --git a/lib/doc/MergedManuals.lyx b/lib/doc/MergedManuals.lyx index 44cbae8..cf72312 100644 --- a/lib/doc/MergedManuals.lyx +++ b/lib/doc/MergedManuals.lyx @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ fil

Re: Using xmllint to test our LyXHTML export

2016-05-26 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2016 um 16:48:58, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016 um 18:03:27, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:55:59PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > > On 2016-05-23, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016 um 07:36:53, schrieb Guenter Mi

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

2016-05-26 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 25.05.2016 um 00:37 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> We have lots of warnings like this. They are usually fixed by doing the >> conversion explicitly, so probably nothing really needs to be done for >> the release. > > This is suspicious to me because usually MSVC has good reason

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

2016-05-26 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 26/05/2016 15:12, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 25.05.2016 um 00:37 schrieb Richard Heck: We have lots of warnings like this. They are usually fixed by doing the conversion explicitly, so probably nothing really needs to be done for the release. This is suspicious to me because usually MSVC has g

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

2016-05-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 25.05.2016 um 00:37 schrieb Richard Heck: We have lots of warnings like this. They are usually fixed by doing the conversion explicitly, so probably nothing really needs to be done for the release. This is suspicious to me because usually MSVC has good reasons for issuing a dataloss warnin

Re: new installer for LyX 2.1.4 available

2016-05-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 17.05.2016 um 23:13 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: The MiKTeX developer said me that... he will release this week a new installer that fixes several MiKTeX issues affecting new installations. So I will include this and then release version 6 of the installer for LyX 2.1.4. Hi Richard, everything is n

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

2016-05-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 25.05.2016 um 00:29 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Despite of the warning the compilation run fine and I have an installer ready. Here it is: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ It contains the fresh MiKTeX release from yesterday. However, I did not yet have the time to test new installation of LyX/MiKTeX

Re: Handling of \SpecialChar

2016-05-26 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 1:39:56 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I'm still curious someone has thoughts on the above idea. The main > question I have is do we usually know when we are not producing > equivalent documents (and thus it is easy to issue a warning)? I assumed > so but I don't have e

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

2016-05-26 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 7:11:14 PM WEST Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Congratulations. And thanks for the excellent management job, Scott. > > Jürgen I agree. :-) Well done. -- José Abílio