Re: SVG Icon going to fallback plaintext in Windows

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:07:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 05:32:05PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 11:26:33AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > > Shankar Giri wrote: > > > > > > > Bug 2: Specifically for MinGW-W64 pacman repository built

Re: SVG Icon going to fallback plaintext in Windows

2016-05-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 05:32:05PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 11:26:33AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > Shankar Giri wrote: > > > > > Bug 2: Specifically for MinGW-W64 pacman repository built Qt libs, the > > > pixmap.load(path); will fail for SVGs and SVGZs (built with

Re: Fix for using system icons

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 05:58:11PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > There is a patch for > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10052 > at > http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/10052/10052_alternative.diff > > I'm planning to commit the patch before rc2 unless someone objects. The > patch is simple

Re: LyX doesn't work with ImageMagick 7

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:57:33AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 12.05.2016 um 08:01 schrieb Richard Heck: > > > Uwe, did you reconfigure after this patch? > > Yes. But the problem persists. I'll postpone this to LyX 2.2.1 since I have > not that much time and are busy to fix third-party program b

Re: Plan to tag and tar 2.2.0rc2 on Monday

2016-05-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 22.05.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I'm fine either way though, so let's have a vote. Currently the vote count is 2-1 in favor of doing the final release tomorrow instead of RC2. +1 to release directly. regards Uwe

Re: LyX does work with ImageMagick 7

2016-05-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 21.05.2016 um 11:27 schrieb Georg Baum: now I found some time to test and it turned out that some information in this thread is wrong. Therefore I removed the warning from release notes again. I would keep it there until we got reports that it really works on all 3 platforms, MacOS, Linux

Re: LyX doesn't work with ImageMagick 7

2016-05-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 12.05.2016 um 07:28 schrieb Georg Baum: $ grep -rw convert development/Win32/packaging/ Thanks Georg, development/Win32/packaging/installer/include/filelist.nsh: ${FILE}rsvg-convert.exe" rsvg-convert.exe is a completely different program and not part of IM. development/Win32/packaging

Re: LyX doesn't work with ImageMagick 7

2016-05-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 12.05.2016 um 08:01 schrieb Richard Heck: Uwe, did you reconfigure after this patch? Yes. But the problem persists. I'll postpone this to LyX 2.2.1 since I have not that much time and are busy to fix third-party program bugs to be able to provide a well-working installer for LyX 2.2.0. I'

Re: We will have to change our output for newest LuaTeX

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 01:26:30PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > There have been some changes in the luatex engine that will be shipped > > with TeX Live 2016 that cause many of our tests to fail (500 something > > instead of 100 something on TL 2015). The root issue is dis

Re: SVG Icon going to fallback plaintext in Windows

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 11:26:33AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Shankar Giri wrote: > > > Bug 2: Specifically for MinGW-W64 pacman repository built Qt libs, the > > pixmap.load(path); will fail for SVGs and SVGZs (built without SVG > > support). So icons all go blank and instead show fall-back text.

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Correct path names were to look for RPM based dictionaries for hunspell on Linux.

2016-05-22 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 10.05.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Stephan Witt : > > commit 5c1a9063cfe95b5b4b31734d6a38ec69a142d5e6 > Author: Stephan Witt > Date: Tue May 10 18:06:48 2016 +0200 > >Correct path names were to look for RPM based dictionaries for hunspell on > Linux. > > diff --git a/src/HunspellChecker.cpp

Re: We will have to change our output for newest LuaTeX

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 03:35:57PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:22:12PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2016-05-22, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 05:32:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:23:24PM +, Guenter

Re: We will have to change our output for newest LuaTeX

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:22:12PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-05-22, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 05:32:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:23:24PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> > On 2016-05-20, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> > > Le 20

Using xmllint to test our LyXHTML export

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Uwe and Georg have recently found and fixed a bug in our internal XHTML export. Why not test the export automatically? These tests would be fast (compared to the LaTeX compilation tests we have). I think our current XHTML tests just check that the exit code is zero. We can extend these tests to wo

Re: We will have to change our output for newest LuaTeX

2016-05-22 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-05-22, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 05:32:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:23:24PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> > On 2016-05-20, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> > > Le 20/05/2016 19:26, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> > >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at

Re: Plan to tag and tar 2.2.0rc2 on Monday

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:20:57PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Me too! > > JMarc > > Le 22 mai 2016 19:49:03 GMT+02:00, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2016 um 13:44:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> Currently the vote count is 2-1 in favor of doing the final release >

Re: Plan to tag and tar 2.2.0rc2 on Monday

2016-05-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Me too! JMarc Le 22 mai 2016 19:49:03 GMT+02:00, Kornel Benko a écrit : >Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2016 um 13:44:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> Currently the vote count is 2-1 in favor of doing the final release >> tomorrow insted of RC2. >> >> Scott > >+1 to release directly. > > Kornel

Re: Plan to tag and tar 2.2.0rc2 on Monday

2016-05-22 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2016 um 13:44:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 05:52:15PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > Le 22/05/2016 16:38, Georg Baum a écrit : > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > Unless something comes up, I'm planning to tag and t

Re: Plan to tag and tar 2.2.0rc2 on Monday

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 05:52:15PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 22/05/2016 16:38, Georg Baum a écrit : > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > Unless something comes up, I'm planning to tag and tar rc2 on Monday. At > > > that point I'll put the tar balls on the FTP and w

Re: Plan to tag and tar 2.2.0rc2 on Monday

2016-05-22 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 22/05/2016 16:38, Georg Baum a écrit : Scott Kostyshak wrote: Dear all, Unless something comes up, I'm planning to tag and tar rc2 on Monday. At that point I'll put the tar balls on the FTP and whenever Mac and Win binaries are uploaded we will announce the release. Great! I wonder whethe

Re: Plan to tag and tar 2.2.0rc2 on Monday

2016-05-22 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > > Unless something comes up, I'm planning to tag and tar rc2 on Monday. At > that point I'll put the tar balls on the FTP and whenever Mac and Win > binaries are uploaded we will announce the release. Great! I wonder whether we need RC2 at all, or whether we

Re: [patch] fix bug 10124 (XHTML export of some symbols)

2016-05-22 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:56:07AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 05/21/2016 05:11 AM, Georg Baum wrote: >> > While testing imagemagick 7 (more on that later) I stumbled upon bug >> > 10124 as well. It is a simple typo where LyX outputs / instead of >> > . OK for 2.2.0?

Re: We will have to change our output for newest LuaTeX

2016-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 05:32:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:23:24PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2016-05-20, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > Le 20/05/2016 19:26, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:06:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >