On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:00:00AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Good news. IM decided now to continue the IM6 series. they just released
> 6.9.4:
> http://www.imagemagick.org/download/binaries/
>
> So there is no to hurry with LyXHTML. It would nevertheless bee helpful if
> LyXHTML can support IM7 an
Good news. IM decided now to continue the IM6 series. they just released
6.9.4:
http://www.imagemagick.org/download/binaries/
So there is no to hurry with LyXHTML. It would nevertheless bee helpful
if LyXHTML can support IM7 and its new command name.
regards Uwe
Am 10.05.2016 um 07:22 schrieb Georg Baum:
I would be in favour as well, but since this is a central part we need your
decision:-)
Many thanks for your work and for putting it in. I notice now that IM7
breaks:
- LyXHTML
- eLyXer
- Pandoc
- tex4ht (with MiKTeX)
and maybe more. It seems that L
test - ignore
Le 08/05/2016 08:59, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Am 07.05.2016 um 17:06 schrieb Guillaume Munch :
Which version of qt is this for? Here on Ubuntu we are still stuck with
5.5.1 for a little while. More generally what qt version is going to be
supported by 2.3 ?
What does Qt5 bring on Linux? If poss
Den 10. mai 2016 17:06, skrev Stephan Witt:
I have no clue why 2.1.4 works - it’s basically the same code. My guess is
you’ve set a user dictionary path here.
Anyway, I propose to check the attached patch. Are you able to build LyX and
try it, please?
Stephan
You were right, there were a di
Am 10.05.2016 um 12:26 schrieb Helge Hafting :
>
>
>
> Den 09. mai 2016 15:36, skrev Stephan Witt:
>> Am 09.05.2016 um 15:14 schrieb Helge Hafting :
>>> Den 09. mai 2016 12:33, skrev Stephan Witt:
Am 09.05.2016 um 11:39 schrieb Helge Hafting :
> Also, the spell checker work if I set the
Den 09. mai 2016 15:36, skrev Stephan Witt:
Am 09.05.2016 um 15:14 schrieb Helge Hafting :
Den 09. mai 2016 12:33, skrev Stephan Witt:
Am 09.05.2016 um 11:39 schrieb Helge Hafting :
Also, the spell checker work if I set the preference to 'Aspell' or 'Enchant'.
Using 'Hunspell',
I still get
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 04:39:54PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> As new issues have popping up (and will without doubt continue to keep popping
> up), I want to give an update of how close I think we are to the next step in
> the release process. The two main issues in my mind are:
