Public release of LyX version 2.2.0rc1
We are proud to announce the first release candidate of LyX 2.2.0.
With this release, LyX celebrates 20 years of existence. The 2.2 series
has a rich set of new features compared to the current stable series.
LyX 2.2
The new installer works, but I can't reproduce the error anymore by
uninstalling VC++ redist 2015.
It is possible, that my old C++ redist Installation was corrupt.
Regards
Am 14.04.2016, 01:45 Uhr, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.04.2016 um 20:03 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Ah, good point! I'll add this to
Double hyphens in LyX-Code are now not merged to an en dash in rc1,
either in LyX or the pdf. Good. But if the font is changed, they become
an en dash in the pdf -- even something as simple as emphasis or bolding
has this effect. Is this expected behaviour? (I was hoping the
separateness of the
On 14/04/2016 7:59 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 14/04/2016 6:03 a.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Ah, good point! I'll add this to the installer.
Many thanks and best regards Uwe
*From: *Jürgen Lange
*Sent: *Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 16:34
*To: *lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org; Uwe Stöhr
*Subject: *Re: lyx 2.2.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 um 01:20:56, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> > Am 13.04.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> >
> > > Could you check where the files comes from?
> >
> > Hi Kornel,
> >
> > It is the attached file. It is already in
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:02:23PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/13/2016 05:20 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> B) Branch 2.2.x from master and continue "unstable" development on master.
> >>
> >> To me it does not feel right that the commits in-between 2.2.0rc1 and
> >>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:38:02PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 12 apr. 2016 22:07 schreef "Vincent van Ravesteijn" :
> >
> >
> > Op 12 apr. 2016 21:29 schreef "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" :
> >
> > >
> > > Le 12/04/16 18:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > >
> > >> So in the commit history of
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:52:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 12/04/16 21:33, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >Let's focus on the following options:
> >
> >A) Branch 2.3.staging from master and continue "unstable" development on
> >2.3.staging. After 2.2.0 is released we merge 2.3.staging
Am 13.04.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I noticed that we have the files
- lyx.svgz
I cannot find this in our git tree.
Sorry. I meant, there is a file
lyx.svg
in Git master and also in the tarball but after the compilation there is
only a
lyx.png
in the resulting folder ~\LYX
Richard Heck wrote:
> Then I propose to go ahead and create 2.3-staging and 2.2.1-staging now.
> The former will be open for all commits, as if it were master, and will
> eventually be merged to master; the latter will be treated as stable and
> will be managed by me alongside 2.1.x.
>
> OK?
Fine
Am 13.04.2016 um 20:03 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Ah, good point! I'll add this to the installer.
Here is the new installer that comes with the necessary DLL files:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0RC-1/
Jürgen, could you please
1. uninstall the Visual C++ Redistributable für Visual Studio 2015
2. uninst
On 14/04/2016 6:03 a.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Ah, good point! I'll add this to the installer.
Many thanks and best regards Uwe
*From: *Jürgen Lange
*Sent: *Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 16:34
*To: *lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org; Uwe Stöhr
*Subject: *Re: lyx 2.2.0 RC 1 failed to start in Windows 10
Problem s
Le 13/04/16 20:07, Richard Heck a écrit :
Richard, I am not sure where this one came from. but your should
double check next time.
The Makefile for src/frontend/qt4 has:
am__liblyxqt4_a_SOURCES_DIST = ButtonPolicy.cpp ButtonPolicy.h \
Dialog.cpp Dialog.h Resources.cpp Action.cpp B
On 04/13/2016 05:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 13/04/2016 11:23, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
It compiles fine on gentoo x86.
BTW why is tarball 2x bigger than for 2.1?
Pavel
>>>
>>> Why 2X bigger? I see a change from 20.8 to 32 from LyX 2.1.4 to
>>> 2.2.
Ah, good point! I'll add this to the installer.Many thanks and best regards Uwe
On 04/13/2016 05:20 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> B) Branch 2.2.x from master and continue "unstable" development on master.
>>
>> To me it does not feel right that the commits in-between 2.2.0rc1 and 2.2.0
>> final would not *necessarily* be in master's commit history.
> I wo
Le 09/03/2016 13:04, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Sorry - it should be:
@for file in $(SOURCEFILES) ; do echo '#include "'$file'"' ; done > $@
With the hash sign included.
I return to these monolithic builds. Does this work on your mac?
JMarc
>From 56a5c7d652df9e337a91273854b700ab68ca796e Mon S
Problem solved!
"Visual C++ Redistributable für Visual Studio 2015" was not installed.
Sorry for the noise.
Regards
Hi Uwe,
can't find the error in my Win10-64bit-Installation (NET framework,
DirectX).
The Dependency Walker found these errors in lyx.exe:
Error: At least one required implicit or forwarded dependency was not
found.
Error: At least one module has an unresolved import due to a missing
expor
On 2016-04-13, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> The recent gcc exploded with memory consumption while compiling lyx,
> I can't compile monolithic build on 2GB RAM machine anymore.
I had this problem long ago (with 1GM) and since then always compile without
debugging symbols:
* `../lyx/configure --enable-bui
> The error is 0xc07b.
Here on Win 10 (64bit) everything works fine.
The error you mention has other origins. In most cases it is .NET (Microsoft just patched .NET today).
Have a look at these possible solutions:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/answers/id-1991597/windows-bit-error-0xc
The error is 0xc07b.
(Version taken from http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0RC-1/)
Regards
Le 13/04/2016 11:23, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
It compiles fine on gentoo x86.
BTW why is tarball 2x bigger than for 2.1?
Pavel
Why 2X bigger? I see a change from 20.8 to 32 from LyX 2.1.4 to 2.2.0rc1.
lyx-2.1.4.tar.xz10673 KB
lyx-2.2.0rc1.tar.xz 19669 KB
It
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I don't know much about this, but it seems to me to be a compiler issue.
>> Your compiler wants to track variables and it reached a limit regarding
>> an internal (with respect to the compiler) limit.
>>
>> Hopefully someone who knows more about this can confirm that
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > It compiles fine on gentoo x86.
> > BTW why is tarball 2x bigger than for 2.1?
> > Pavel
>
> Why 2X bigger? I see a change from 20.8 to 32 from LyX 2.1.4 to 2.2.0rc1.
lyx-2.1.4.tar.xz10673 KB
lyx-2.2.0rc1.tar.xz 19669 KB
> Here are some possible reasons:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> B) Branch 2.2.x from master and continue "unstable" development on
> master.
>
> To me it does not feel right that the commits in-between 2.2.0rc1 and
> 2.2.0 final would not *necessarily* be in master's commit history. I
I would prefer to see 2.2.0 final commit in master
Le 12/04/2016 23:52, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Am 12.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
The tar balls and sig files are here:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
I noticed that we have the files
- lyx.svgz
I cannot find this in our git tree.
- spellcheck-continously.svg
Le 13/04/2016 08:29, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
$ insets/InsetListingsParams.cpp: In constructor
‘lyx::{anonymous}::ParValidator::ParValidator()’:
insets/InsetListingsParams.cpp:298:1: note: variable tracking size limit
exceeded with -fvar-tracking-assignments, retrying without
ParValidator::ParVa
Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 um 01:20:56, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 13.04.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> > Could you check where the files comes from?
>
> Hi Kornel,
>
> It is the attached file. It is already in the tarball in the folder
> ~\lib\examples
>
> I see now that it is also in
> ~\l
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:32:05AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 12.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > The tar balls and sig files are here:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
> >
> > Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
> >
> > Non-packagers, ple
30 matches
Mail list logo
