On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:29:56AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:19:27AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Am 11.03.2016 um 09:48 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > So why can't there be a step by step rule in our development.lyx that
> > everybody can understand? That would be
Dear all,
This email is my attempt to respond to what I think is a great idea [1] from
Uwe:
"So why can't there be a step by step rule in our development.lyx that
everybody can understand? That would be the decision."
If there is no rule, it is difficult to spend time working on a patch knowing
On 25/03/2016 3:07 p.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 25/03/2016 11:51 a.m., Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/24/2016 06:16 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:27:32AM +1300, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I notice (in 2.2 beta2 on windows7) on typing LyX, TeX, LaTeX,
LaTeX2e, that
these strings
On 25/03/2016 11:51 a.m., Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/24/2016 06:16 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:27:32AM +1300, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I notice (in 2.2 beta2 on windows7) on typing LyX, TeX, LaTeX, LaTeX2e, that
these strings are *not* converted to the logos. Nor does savi
On 03/24/2016 06:16 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:27:32AM +1300, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
>> I notice (in 2.2 beta2 on windows7) on typing LyX, TeX, LaTeX, LaTeX2e, that
>> these strings are *not* converted to the logos. Nor does saving, closing and
>> reopening the document
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:27:32AM +1300, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I notice (in 2.2 beta2 on windows7) on typing LyX, TeX, LaTeX, LaTeX2e, that
> these strings are *not* converted to the logos. Nor does saving, closing and
> reopening the document convert them to the logos, nor do they display as
>
I notice (in 2.2 beta2 on windows7) on typing LyX, TeX, LaTeX, LaTeX2e,
that these strings are *not* converted to the logos. Nor does saving,
closing and reopening the document convert them to the logos, nor do
they display as logos in the pdf.
However, if I export to 2.1 format and then reloa
On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:36:45 PM WET Georg Baum wrote:
> You are right. I did only test the patch manually with some of the
> conversions, and they did work. Now I did test it more systematically in
> the build system, and it turned out that in some cases the u prefix is
> needed, but not
