Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

2016-03-08 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 08.03.2016 um 23:47 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:49:20PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 08.03.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:36:08AM +0100, Jean-Marc

Plan for 2.2.0rc1

2016-03-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Dear all, I think we are getting close to being able to release 2.2.0rc1. We have not discussed whether to release a beta3 or move directly to rc1. If others disagree with moving directly to rc1, please do speak up and let's discuss. Below are the items to consider fixing for rc1. 1. Although #9

Re: 11 ctests fail after TL update

2016-03-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 09:36:43PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > After all, this is a know upstream bug, not a "real" LyX issue (although LyX > may add a workaround as suggested in #8035). Do you have a link to the upstream bug report? So to make sure I understand, it would not be helpful if I

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

2016-03-08 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I'm not sure if we should be concerned that you can't build a monolithic > build or not on Mac. Does anyone think this is a problem we should be > concerned with? Monolithic option is interesting for folks who compile lyx from tarball on their own - like in linux distros b

Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals

2016-03-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:45:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 26/02/2016 05:07, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >>We don't have a patch. > > > >Nevermind. A patch was proposed here: > >https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=56B365D0.4040203%40free.fr > > So someone has to update it a

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

2016-03-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:49:20PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 08.03.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:36:08AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>> Le 07/03/2016 06:14, Scott Kost

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

2016-03-08 Thread Pavel Sanda
Stephan Witt wrote: > 1. What???s the point of using --enable-monolithic-build=yes ? Should be considerably faster to compile than separate units (unless you have dozen of cores allowing -j parallelism). Pavel

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

2016-03-08 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 08.03.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:36:08AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 07/03/2016 06:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : But setting --enable-monolithic-build to "no" leads

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

2016-03-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:36:08AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 07/03/2016 06:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > >But setting --enable-monolithic-build to "no" leads to all of the > > >commands passing. > > > > I would

Re: Problem with key shortcuts on 2.2 with qt-5.5

2016-03-08 Thread José Matos
On Monday, March 07, 2016 11:34:50 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I think so, but I cannot reproduce. Note that I am using Qt 5.6beta > though so perhaps it is a Qt bug that has been fixed. Also note that I > am compiling Qt so that could be another difference. > > Scott OK I will wait for Qt 5.6 to