On 11/02/2015 03:16 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
This last observation suggests what is the minimal change to be performed,
i.e., let the latex run work as if the document dir was the current
directory. This means setting the relevant environment variables such
that the document dir is also scann
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:57:37PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Note that we missed LyX 20th birthday: while Lyrix was released circa July
> > 1995, the first real LyX release probably happened in september 1995. The
> > first long-lived version was 0.7, which got r
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 11:37:06AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 02/11/2015 03:42, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >Does anyone have an issue that they think should be considered as an
> >alpha blocker?
>
> Not me. Let's get this alpha out!
Sounds good. I should have time on Wednesday to go
Le 02/11/2015 18:38, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 28/10/2015 16:39, Ilan a écrit :
Thanks David and Stephan.
My problem is that I'm working on a multi-file project so under the tmp
directory there are several directories and the location of the Latex
file
depends on the file I compiled (and of
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Note that we missed LyX 20th birthday: while Lyrix was released circa July
> 1995, the first real LyX release probably happened in september 1995. The
> first long-lived version was 0.7, which got released at the end of
> september.
>
> Source: http://www.lyx.org/mi
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:05:58AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >Looking at what other programs do in similar (but slightly different)
> >situations:
> >
> >evince and firefox both have:
> >Open Containing Folder
> >
> >fslint has:
> >Open Folder
> >
> >filelight has:
> >Open File Manager Here
Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Stating more than that sounds like overkill.
>
> I still favour specifying a required TeXLive version based on these
> considerations.
>
> If we take the conservative route, this would be TeXLive 2012 that ships
> with the current CentOS (v. 7).
Quickly skimming through
Le 03/11/2015 00:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:11:08AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
The "Open directory..." could also get rid of the "Show Output Anyway"
button for the same reasoning as (1) above. I like the "Show Output
Anyway" button how it is, but I'm not sure i
If you open the submenu of tables you see many entries. In my opinion
too many, at least too many for laptops with small screens.
In general I think it should be less crowded. Thus a proposal:
- everything is removed for which we also have toolbar button. (If users
disabled the automatic show
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:11:08AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >The "Open directory..." could also get rid of the "Show Output Anyway"
> >button for the same reasoning as (1) above. I like the "Show Output
> >Anyway" button how it is, but I'm not sure if that's because I just got
> >used to it
Le 02/11/2015 23:50, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:49:24PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 02/11/2015 21:10, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
Your proposed button would also solve #9211 "Make the lyxpreview.log
files accessible within LyX".
I agree, part of this idea comes f
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:49:24PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 02/11/2015 21:10, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
> >Your proposed button would also solve #9211 "Make the lyxpreview.log
> >files accessible within LyX".
> >
>
>
> I agree, part of this idea comes from all the times I had to debug ly
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 10:40:27PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-11-01, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Dear Scott,
>
> > thanks for the patch.
>
> I modified it to use UTF8 with XeTeX without the
> \inputencoding commands. A short test here showed that this
> helps with Umlauts or Cyrillic cha
On 2015-11-01, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Dear Scott,
> thanks for the patch.
I modified it to use UTF8 with XeTeX without the
\inputencoding commands. A short test here showed that this
helps with Umlauts or Cyrillic charactes in the PDF Info.
Give it a try.
Günter
Exec: git 'diff' 2>&1
Dir: /us
Le 02/11/2015 21:10, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
Your proposed button would also solve #9211 "Make the lyxpreview.log
files accessible within LyX".
I agree, part of this idea comes from all the times I had to debug lyx
previews (but not only).
For the interface, I also propose to substitute th
On 3/11/2015 7:38 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 28/10/2015 16:39, Ilan a écrit :
Thanks David and Stephan.
My problem is that I'm working on a multi-file project so under the tmp
directory there are several directories and the location of the Latex
file
depends on the file I compiled (and
Dear all,
I have prepared a unit test framework based on google-test (gtest). You
can see the commits at
http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/vfr/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/tests.
It includes gtest-1.7.0 (permitted by the license).
Unit testing can be enabled by running CMake with
-DLYX_EN
Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 21:31:12, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 11:21:09, schrieb Kornel Benko
> > Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
> > > Dear Scott and Kornel,
> > >
> > > On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov
Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 11:21:09, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> > Dear Scott and Kornel,
> >
> > On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > >> Am Sonntag, 1. Nove
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 22:41:39, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> Thanks to all of those participating in the discussions about tests. I have
> learned a lot the last couple of weeks. Thank you also to those who have tried
> to run the tests. This to me is a great step forward. I know that the
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:16:41PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:26:36PM -0500, PhilipPirrip wrote:
>
> > On 11/02/2015 10:44 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:47:42PM -0500, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> > >
> > >>Hi Enrico, thank you for your re
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> So in summary, regarding the XeTeX + TeX fonts, I propose the above policy
> to start with; and if we find that there really is such a low signal to
> noise ratio then we can change our minds and ignore them. But we will
> never know what the signal to noise ratio is if we
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:26:36PM -0500, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 10:44 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:47:42PM -0500, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Enrico, thank you for your response. I hope the others will help us
> >>resolve this too.
> >
> >Given the o
Richard Heck wrote:
> I think it would be a perfectly reasonable requirement from now on
> ---say, starting in the 2.3.x development cycle---that every format
> change be accompanied by some kind of test file that illustrates the use
> of the new feature (that's what it usually is) and that can be
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/25/2015 07:43 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2015 um 12:04:36, schrieb Georg Baum
>>
>>> PhilipPirrip wrote:
>>>
LibreOffice has it as "Special Characters". Fedora Linux has an
application called "Character Map" that lists characters by, I
Le 28/10/2015 16:39, Ilan a écrit :
Thanks David and Stephan.
My problem is that I'm working on a multi-file project so under the tmp
directory there are several directories and the location of the Latex file
depends on the file I compiled (and of course the tmp directory has a different
name ea
On 11/02/2015 10:44 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:47:42PM -0500, PhilipPirrip wrote:
Hi Enrico, thank you for your response. I hope the others will help us
resolve this too.
Given the overwhelming amount of replies, I doubt anyone is interested
in this matter.
Oh
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:47:42PM -0500, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> Hi Enrico, thank you for your response. I hope the others will help us
> resolve this too.
Given the overwhelming amount of replies, I doubt anyone is interested
in this matter.
> I'd rather call this a bug in the script than in se
Le 02/11/2015 12:34, Peter Kümmel a écrit :
The scripts removes all existing files and adds all found by bcp.
Four files were deleted, ( git diff 04be61ea8 --name-status | grep D )
OK, thanks.
But bcp is called with these headers:
[...]
so, when something has changed there, then we have
too
Am 02.11.2015 um 11:40 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 01/11/2015 16:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 11:08:51PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Am 25.10.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:13:03PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I have it
Le 01/11/2015 16:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 11:08:51PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Am 25.10.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:13:03PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I have it documented somewhere. Should I put it in development.l
Le 02/11/2015 09:03, Guenter Milde a écrit :
Besides this, #9830 prevents us from making documents more robust avoiding
non-ASCII characters in the PDF Header Information
(e.g. replacing Stöhr with St\"{o}hr) to solve some export test issues.
I agree that this bug is annoying, but it is certain
Le 02/11/2015 03:42, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Does anyone have an issue that they think should be considered as an
alpha blocker?
Not me. Let's get this alpha out!
Note that we missed LyX 20th birthday: while Lyrix was released circa
July 1995, the first real LyX release probably happened in
Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
> Dear Scott and Kornel,
>
> On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:27:11, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >>
>
> >> > Could we intro
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 20:14:40, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 11/01/2015 08:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:56:55PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/01/2015
On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:31:32PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-11-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
...
>> >> While there is a use case for LuaTeX and TeX fonts, I can't see a
>> >> reason to use XeTeX instead of pdflatex with TeX fonts!
>> > The use c
On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Good point. On the other hand, if we make regex changes then it is
> harder to revert them. Problems have come up before of us
> misconstructing the regexes.
If possible, make separate regexp patterns for separate "fail reasons".
Then, we just have to delet
Dear Scott and Kornel,
On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:27:11, schrieb Guenter Milde
>>
>> > Could we introduce a new status "suspended" - meaning just skip the
>> > test until a known bug
Dear Scott,
On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> In fact, at some point (I guess for 1.6?) the criteria for going from
> beta to RC was that there is no dataloss bug. The only dataloss bug
> with a 2.2.0 milestone is #9362.
I don't think it is an alpha blocker, but #9830 is in fact a dataloss
39 matches
Mail list logo
