On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> commit f65f3adbf73283a288f5d186b51b6b98c9ecb51d
> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Date: Sun Jul 19 01:22:10 2015 +0200
>
> Do not break row elements at spaces
>
> The goal of this commit is to make painting faster by reducing
Guillaume has various patches for bug fixes in several places that
have been waiting around a bit. I do not know enough about the code
that the patches touch in order to review them. However, I can test
the patches and confirm that they fix the corresponding bugs. Is my
testing combined with the fa
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 08/18/2015 04:19 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/17/2015 06:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> Scott Ko
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 08/18/2015 04:19 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2015 06:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> OK good to know. Let's see if anyone el
On 08/18/2015 04:19 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/17/2015 06:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
OK good to know. Let's see if anyone else has an opinion about putting
refresh() into exists().
Is the only reason the bug de
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 08/17/2015 06:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>>
>>> OK good to know. Let's see if anyone else has an opinion about putting
>>> refresh() into exists().
>>
>> Is the only reason the bug described in the begining of
On 08/17/2015 06:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
OK good to know. Let's see if anyone else has an opinion about putting
refresh() into exists().
Is the only reason the bug described in the begining of the thread?
Is adding refresh() into the LFUN you want enough to fix the prob
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> OK good to know. Let's see if anyone else has an opinion about putting
>> refresh() into exists().
>
> Is the only reason the bug described in the begining of the thread?
It's the only specific reason I have come acro
