Re: Build questions for OS X

2015-07-09 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 09.07.2015 um 21:39 schrieb Georg Baum : > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> On 09/07/2015 17:13, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> From what I understand, the problem is only with libc++ (the clang >>> Standard library) and on this one setting std=c++98 does not change >>> anything. I just tried

Re: Build questions for OS X

2015-07-09 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > On 09/07/2015 17:13, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> From what I understand, the problem is only with libc++ (the clang >> Standard library) and on this one setting std=c++98 does not change >> anything. I just tried that with clang 3.6 and compilation fails. >> >> We

Re: my first commit to the Git repository

2015-07-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear LyX developers, > > after years of comments and patches, I just pushed my first commit to the > LyX repository. http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/c56f0538a00/lyxgit Finally :) Welcome on board. P

Re: #9673: lyx change the order of references

2015-07-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:27 AM, edu Gpl wrote: > i do, but no changed.[image: 😂] > Hi, I don't understand. What do you mean by "i do". And what did not change? Best, Scott

Re: #9673: lyx change the order of references

2015-07-09 Thread edu Gpl
i do, but no changed.😂 2015-07-09 14:55 GMT+03:00 LyX Ticket Tracker : > #9673: lyx change the order of references > ---+- > Reporter: mandrivagnome | Owner: lasgouttes > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: norma

Re: Build questions for OS X

2015-07-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
On 09/07/2015 17:13, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: From what I understand, the problem is only with libc++ (the clang Standard library) and on this one setting std=c++98 does not change anything. I just tried that with clang 3.6 and compilation fails. We should maybe make c++11 the default for ne

Re: Build questions for OS X

2015-07-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 08/07/2015 20:46, Georg Baum a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I have seen that too. I did not think about enforcing c++98. Shall I try that? I think that would be a good idea at least for newer compilers (e.g. for gcc version 5 and newer, for clang probably always). From what I unde

Re: Need RtL user wisdom (was: Re: logical cursor movement)

2015-07-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:19:02PM -0700, Lior Silberman wrote: > For the cursor things are as I thought: check out > Paragraph::getParLanguage in Paragraph.cpp. > > Lior Thanks Lior for your detailed explanation. There are still things I would like to understand further, but at least knowing thi