Re: [LyX/master] Fix bugs #8546 and #9055, and introduce new separator inset.

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:29:48PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > commit c668ebf61151e1cdf6b583dc5ecdc8f8a0cfc678 > Author: Enrico Forestieri > Date: Sat May 10 23:25:11 2014 +0200 > > Fix bugs #8546 and #9055, and introduce new separator inset. This commit seems to have caused a lyx2ly

Re: Merging features/fix-tex2lyx-tests to master

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 31.05.2015 um 22:01 schrieb Georg Baum: > >> I tested that the old LyX file produced correct .tex results, now I see >> that it creates correct .tex results with the new version as well. It did >> not occur to me that both hor_pos "c" and hor_pos "l" in .lyx would >> produce

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

On 06/09/2015 02:31 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslations in the 2.1.x branch if a modification is not allowed. pt_BR is new in branch for LyX 2.1.4 so there was definitely a change of the file. No. The last change was at bdc1271

Re: Merging features/fix-tex2lyx-tests to master

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 02.06.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Georg Baum: > >>> tex2lyx -f -roundtrip test-insets.tex >> >> This command looks good. Again, please answer my question: Did you copy >> test-insets.tex somewhere, or did you run this command on the .tex file >> in the git tree? > > I don't under

Re: [patch] fix bug 7657 - Inkscape detection in configure.py

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 04.06.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Georg Baum: > >>> Could some pythionist please review this? >> >> First you need to explain why you use this complicated quoting, and what >> problem it solves. >> If such a quoting is really needed, > > Of course it is necessary otherwise I woul

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslations in the > 2.1.x branch if a modification is not allowed. > pt_BR is new in branch for LyX 2.1.4 so there was definitely a change of > the file. No. The last change was at bdc1271c3905, which was before the 2.1.0 rel

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

Thanks a lot Now it works Best greetings Valentin 09.06.2015 20:05, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет: 2015-06-09 19:01 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin >: I do not understand exactly "reconfigure LyX". Does it means that I should repeat: ./configue make make in

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

2015-06-09 19:01 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > I do not understand exactly "reconfigure LyX". Does it means that I should > repeat: > > ./configue > make > make install > Yes. Jürgen > > ? > >

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 19:57, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет: 2015-06-09 18:51 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin >: Sorry, I do not have a spellchecker in Lyx stil Did you reconfigure LyX after you installed libhunspell-dev? If so, could you please post the configure.log? Jürgen I do

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

2015-06-09 18:51 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > > Sorry, I do not have a spellchecker in Lyx stil > Did you reconfigure LyX after you installed libhunspell-dev? If so, could you please post the configure.log? Jürgen

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 19:16, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет: 2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin >: Couldn't you list pakages which I should install to have spellchecker? I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/i386/

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2015 um 18:16:43, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > 2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > > > > > Couldn't you list pakages > > which I should install to have spellchecker? > > > > I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/m

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > > Couldn't you list pakages > which I should install to have spellchecker? > I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/i386/libhunspell-dev Jürgen > > Is it possible in 10.10? > >

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Valentin A. Kuzmin wrote: > 09.06.2015 19:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет: > > 2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : >> >> I had installed hunspell: >> >> [maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell >> Reading package lists... Done >> Building dependency tree >>

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 19:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет: 2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin >: I had installed hunspell: [maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > I had installed hunspell: > > [maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > hunspell is already the newest version. > The following packages were automatica

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 18:52, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3 -+- Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: general |

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 16:53, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3 -+- Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.1.4 Component: general

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 18:39, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3 -+- Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.1.4 Component: general

Warnings With Automake

Using automake 1.15 (though I think I also saw this earlier), I get a ton of warnings like: src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am:71: warning: source file '../version.cpp' is in a subdirectory, src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am:71: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled I'll post all of them below. Anything to do

Re: [patch] support for Pandoc in configure.py

On 06/09/2015 01:07 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 04.06.2015 um 02:37 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Attached is a patch. No opinions? Should we add support for Pandoc in LyX 2.2 or not? From a user perspective, that would be nice. Pandoc support has

Re: [patch] fix bug 7657 - Inkscape detection in configure.py

On 2015-06-08, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 04.06.2015 um 23:31 schrieb Guenter Milde: >> Do you really need a full path to the binary on Windows? > Yes. OK. >> Please keep the current distinction of >>program call (ac_prog) >>program name (ac_word) >>path (path) >> even i

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2015 um 00:31:16, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 04.06.2015 um 18:12 schrieb Georg Baum: > > > It is forbidden to update layouttranslations in a stable release, and if an > > update is done in master it must not be done by hand, > > Richard kindly already reverted it. > > However,