This new feeature deserves an entry with a screenshot image in our list
of new features:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX22
JMarc, maybe you can do this as you know the feature the best?
regards Uwe
On 01/10/2015 08:20 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello JMarc,
after your merge I get these 2 compilation warnings:
..\..\src\RowPainter.cpp(448): warning C4244: 'Argument': conversion
of 'float' to 'int', possible dataloss
..\..\src\RowPainter.cpp(450): warning C4244: 'Initialisation':
conversion
Hello JMarc,
after your merge I get these 2 compilation warnings:
..\..\src\RowPainter.cpp(448): warning C4244: 'Argument': conversion
of 'float' to 'int', possible dataloss
..\..\src\RowPainter.cpp(450): warning C4244: 'Initialisation':
conversion of 'float' to 'const int'
(I am wonderi
Am 09.01.2015 um 20:11 schrieb Georg Baum:
I will just move texstream to src. It is in the lyx namespace anyway, and
moving TeXRow to src/support does not look right.
Many thanks. I can now compile master again.
regards Uwe
Thanks a lot!
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:58 PM, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> #9378: Bad appendix sections numbering using branches
> -+-
> Reporter: nicolasLS| Owner: lasgouttes
> Type: enhancement | Status: closed
> Prior
Thanks for the quick reply. It might not be a bug per se, but I'm not sure
I would call it a feature. I thought I major interest of branches is to be
able to keep a coherent set of cross references. Anyway, ERT isn't all that
bad.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:28 PM, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> #93
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Liviu Andronic
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Cyrille!
>>> Some comments below.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Cyrille Artho wrote:
Hi all,
I've checked and you are right, it is not related to the appendix per se.
The section numbering changes when I compile both branches, or when I only
compile one branch.
Just to let you know in case it helps: The editors asked us to reduce our
paper a lot, but they proposed to use an online appendi
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Liviu Andronic
> wrote:
>> Hi Cyrille!
>> Some comments below.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Cyrille Artho wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I was very happy to be able to attend this year's GSoC Reunion
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Hi Cyrille!
> Some comments below.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Cyrille Artho wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I was very happy to be able to attend this year's GSoC Reunion, as I could
>> learn about a lot of other open source projects that
Hi Cyrille!
Some comments below.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Cyrille Artho wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was very happy to be able to attend this year's GSoC Reunion, as I could
> learn about a lot of other open source projects that I otherwise probably
> would never have heard of.
> It was also nic
Am Freitag, 9. Januar 2015 um 20:11:00, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Freitag, 9. Januar 2015 um 11:28:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Do you also have a suggestion to what should Uwe in the mean
12 matches
Mail list logo
