On 11/23/2014 05:57 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 23/11/2014 22:21, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/23/2014 02:38 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 23/11/2014 18:34, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
This string might be modified by some class in main thread while being
read at the same time by a buffe
On 23/11/2014 22:21, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/23/2014 02:38 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 23/11/2014 18:34, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
This string might be modified by some class in main thread while being
read at the same time by a buffer clone in the export thread. If the
memory reserv
On 11/23/2014 02:38 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 23/11/2014 18:34, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
This string might be modified by some class in main thread while being
read at the same time by a buffer clone in the export thread. If the
memory reserved by basic-string is big enough we should
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Do you see the following issue with Qt 5 on Mac OS X?
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9223
> I would not be surprised if that is specific to Linux but I would
> appreciate it if you could check. To check, download the document
> attached t
Le 23/11/2014 18:34, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
This string might be modified by some class in main thread while being
read at the same time by a buffer clone in the export thread. If the
memory reserved by basic-string is big enough we should be fine but if
not basic_string will allocate anothe
On 22/11/2014 23:01, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/22/2014 03:19 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 20/11/2014 21:04, Georg Baum wrote:
I don't think so in this case. The crash happens because internal
std::basic_string members are corrupt, and it is almost always a string
created from Language::babel
Am 21.11.2014 um 23:37 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 20.11.2014 um 09:10 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>> wrote:
Le 18/11/14 02:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>
> The
Hello,
I have found a small conversion issue from lyx 2.0 to 2.1.
In 2.0 one could define blocks and, for what I could tell, the block
title was to be specified with ERT.
In 2.1 one can insert the block title and the ERT text is now
interpreted as part of the block.
You can find in attachme
