Sven Hoexter wrote:
> It's interesting especially in the light of a recent discussion in
> Debian which of the "traditional" Unix tools should no longer have
> priority standard and thus be installed as a default.
Do you have a link to some summary? P
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:11:34PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 25 September 2014 11:09:47 Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hey,
> > You rock! Thanks, it was indeed a missing build-depedency on bc.
>
> That requirement is there for all the 2.1.x releases. Until I found that it
> was bc that missin
On Thursday 25 September 2014 11:09:47 Sven Hoexter wrote:
> You rock! Thanks, it was indeed a missing build-depedency on bc.
>
> Cheers,
> Sven
That requirement is there for all the 2.1.x releases. Until I found that it was
bc that missing it was a huge headache. :-)
https://apps.fedoraproject
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 05:37:18PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
> > I just tried to jump in before the next Debian freeze and tried to
> > do an ad-hoc bump of the LyX package to 2.1.2. Sadly my naive attempt
> > to build it failed with:
>
> Do you have 'bc' in build requi
On 2014-08-25, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 08/24/2014 04:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/24/2014 04:28 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 24. August 2014 um 00:29:34,
On 2014-09-12, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag 11 September 2014, 09:21:57 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>>> I think I've narrowed this down to one question: Is there an advantage
>>> to not loading the package fixme if there is no
