On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 26.06.2014 10:11, schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
>
The patch implements the use of LYX_USE_QT variable, so the default
compilation should use
qt4 even if also qt5 devel files are installed.
>>>
>>>
>>> That would be very helpful. This
Am 26.06.2014 10:11, schrieb Kornel Benko:
The patch implements the use of LYX_USE_QT variable, so the default compilation
should use
qt4 even if also qt5 devel files are installed.
That would be very helpful. This way I can try Qt 5 for master and use
Qt 4 to compile releases of 2.1. Please
Am 26.06.2014 20:22, schrieb Georg Baum:
Not needed. Line 3855 contains only a closing brace '}' in 2.1 branch. The
warning makes sense if you look at master. There you have
if (pos < from + lyxrc.completion_minlength)
which is indeed a comparison between signed and unsigned values. I'll fix
t
Am Donnerstag, 26. Juni 2014 um 20:16:56, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2014 um 23:29:34, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> >
> >>
> >> That would be very helpful. This way I can try Qt 5 for master and use
> >> Qt 4 to compile releases of 2.1. Please commit.
> >
> > Don
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I was now able to compile Master with Qt 5.3. LyX works so far, but
> crashes immediately when trying to view a file as PDF. So yes, Qt 5 and
> LyX does not yet work but we should try to make this possible for LyX
> LyX 2.2.
Yes. There have been many discussion already on that
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I get this warning when compiling current LyX 2.1.x branch:
>
> "D:\LyXGit\Master\compile-result\src\LyX.vcxproj" (Standard target) (3) ->
> (ClCompile target) ->
> ..\..\src\Paragraph.cpp(3855): warning C4018: '<': conflict between
> 'signed' and 'unsigned' [D:\LyXGit\Mast
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2014 um 23:29:34, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
>
>>
>> That would be very helpful. This way I can try Qt 5 for master and use
>> Qt 4 to compile releases of 2.1. Please commit.
>
> Done. I am pretty sure, this does not break users using Qt4.
>
> I hope, Richard
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2014 um 23:29:34, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 25.06.2014 18:28, schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> >> I understood that he _is_ trying 2.1.
>
> Yes.
>
> >> QT5 will be used there, if cmake finds it. So one has to deinstall QT5.
>
> That is bad.
>
> > Uwe, please try this patch (on 2.1 bran
Am Donnerstag, 26. Juni 2014 um 00:05:40, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 25.06.2014 11:21, schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> >> - CMake Warning at CMakeLists.txt:549 (find_package):
> >> By not providing "FindQt5X11Extras.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this
> >> project has asked CMake to find a package configuratio
