Two blocks of code differed very little so I combined them. I'm not
sure what LyX's style norms are about this. I like this because (1)
now it is not easy to change in one place and forget about the other
and (2) it's easy to see exactly where the code differs between the
two.
Opinions?
Scott
Fro
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Good idea. I've tested a few different scenarios and it holds up. I'll
> wait a bit longer to see if anyone else wants to test and then I'll
> commit.
It's in at de091e6c.
Scott
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 08:21 AM, Eddie Rucker wrote:
>>
>> Hi Scott.
>>
>> I think I have found the issue. But, first,
>>
>>> Eddie, how did you install 2.0.7 on your machine?
>>
>> I uninstalled 2.0.7
>>
>>> Did you compile manually?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>>
On 06/06/2014 08:21 AM, Eddie Rucker wrote:
Hi Scott.
I think I have found the issue. But, first,
Eddie, how did you install 2.0.7 on your machine?
I uninstalled 2.0.7
Did you compile manually?
Yes.
You might consider trying LyX 2.2.dev from the daily PPA. For instructions,
see here: ht
Here's a link to the updated patch (after fixing whitespace, indentation,
ignored moc_* files and commented header file)
https://gist.github.com/HotSushi/a989d1657775d8eca6fe
link to project wiki page:
http://wiki.lyx.org/GSoC/InteractiveLyX
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Sushant Raikar
Hi Scott.
I think I have found the issue. But, first,
> Eddie, how did you install 2.0.7 on your machine?
I uninstalled 2.0.7
> Did you compile manually?
Yes.
> You might consider trying LyX 2.2.dev from the daily PPA. For instructions,
> see here: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnUbuntu#toc3
T
Thanks Cyrille,
I have updated the project's Wiki page to show my progress so far (under
'Project Status' section)
note: all of the patches are diffed with master branch.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Cyrille Artho wrote:
> Hi Sushant,
> Thanks for posting the patch. It's good to see that yo
