Am 22.04.2014 um 06:39 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> José Matos wrote:
>> Before proceeding with the changes we should add tests to guarantee that the
>> code works as intended on both versions.
>>
>> I do not intend to work on this until the end of the semester (mid June
>> FWIW) but I would like to
Benjamin Piwowarski wrote:
> I started to convert to python 3 some central scripts (configure.py a among
> those). Most of the problems are due to print calls, and the remaining
> problems were straightforward to solve. I will push this to master soon.
Benjamin,
such patches should be always se
Hi,
I started to convert to python 3 some central scripts (configure.py a among
those). Most of the problems are due to print calls, and the remaining problems
were straightforward to solve. I will push this to master soon.
Benjamin
> Le 22 avr. 2014 à 06:39, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>
> Jos
José Matos wrote:
> Before proceeding with the changes we should add tests to guarantee that the
> code works as intended on both versions.
>
> I do not intend to work on this until the end of the semester (mid June FWIW)
> but I would like to start the discussion here.
The more versions suppor
On 04/21/2014 12:14 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
Should we delete 2.2-staging and 2.1-staging now to avoid confusion?
Or just leave them?
The ayes had it, and this has been done.
Richard
On 04/21/2014 06:40 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The warnings that remain after this patch are of two sorts:
* unused parameters in boost, like:
In file included from
../../../../master/boost/boost/smart_ptr/make_shared_array.hpp:15:
../../../../master/boost/boost/smart_ptr/detail/make_arra
On 04/21/2014 05:37 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Richard Heck schreef op 21-4-2014 17:36:
Let me wait a bit and see if we hear from Vincent.
Richard
I was working on it until something slightly more important came into
my life.
Please proceed with what you think is right for the mome
The warnings that remain after this patch are of two sorts:
* unused parameters in boost, like:
In file included from
../../../../master/boost/boost/smart_ptr/make_shared_array.hpp:15:
../../../../master/boost/boost/smart_ptr/detail/make_array_helper.hpp:75:62:
warning:
unused parameter
Richard Heck schreef op 21-4-2014 17:36:
Let me wait a bit and see if we hear from Vincent.
Richard
I was working on it until something slightly more important came into my
life.
Please proceed with what you think is right for the moment.
Vincent
Abdelrazak Younes schreef op 19-4-2014 19:29:
On 19/04/2014 19:25, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/19/2014 01:17 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
If you want to remove yourself as owner of the other bugs, that is
fairly easy to do via Batch Modify. Just select all the bugs you
want to change and switc
Welcome to LyX message sent to accepted students.
Message to acceptable/rejected students to follow soon.
Cheers,
S.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/21/2014 01:14 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
>
> Thanks Richard.
>
> But I am not sure what you mean by:
>
>
> On
Hi all,
I suggest to update the python code used by lyx to support both python
2 and python 3 with the same code.
For those who (did not) read the summit notes from Guido:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/147048
There is one point particularly that I noticed:
"- The recomm
On Monday 21 April 2014 09:26:29 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I would delete them. Pavel
FWIW I agree. +1 +) SCNR
--
José Abílio
Am 18.04.2014 um 08:57 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
> Richard Heck schreef op 18-4-2014 0:33:
>>
>> I now have all binaries for 2.0.8, and Stephan just emailed a link to the
>> OSX one for 2.1.0, so I take it we are just about good to go. How shall we
>> proceed here, to avoid confusion for
Am 21.04.2014 um 18:14 schrieb Richard Heck :
>
> OK, I want ahead and merged 2.2-staging into master. Commit as you wish.
Thank you.
>
> Should we delete 2.2-staging and 2.1-staging now to avoid confusion? Or just
> leave them?
I vote for delete.
Stephan
>
> Richard
>
Am Montag, 21. April 2014 um 12:14:48, schrieb Richard Heck
>
> OK, I want ahead and merged 2.2-staging into master. Commit as you wish.
>
> Should we delete 2.2-staging and 2.1-staging now to avoid confusion? Or
> just leave them?
>
> Richard
I vote for delete.
Kornel
signature.asc
Richard Heck wrote:
> Should we delete 2.2-staging and 2.1-staging now to avoid confusion? Or
> just leave them?
I would delete them. Pavel
OK, I want ahead and merged 2.2-staging into master. Commit as you wish.
Should we delete 2.2-staging and 2.1-staging now to avoid confusion? Or
just leave them?
Richard
On 04/21/2014 11:05 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Montag, 21. April 2014 um 11:01:39, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 04/21/2014 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >> I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
> >>
Am Montag, 21. April 2014 um 11:01:39, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 04/21/2014 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >> I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
> >> for a "master is open" email and did not find it. Did
On 04/21/2014 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
for a "master is open" email and did not find it. Did I make a
mistake?
I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed
Le 21/04/2014 16:34, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
for a "master is open" email and did not find it. Did I make a
mistake?
I did that too, and began to wonder what is supposed to happen wrt
2.2-staging. Who is going to cherry-pi
I just committed to master because I thought it was open but I looked
for a "master is open" email and did not find it. Did I make a
mistake?
Scott
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
>
Ubuntu packages are now available on the PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/release
Liviu
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
>
> As usual I'll
The file compiles for me before a860d18b but not after. I wonder if
it's a difference of TeX Live 2013 vs. MikTeX, or perhaps something
specific to my installation.
Scott
25 matches
Mail list logo
