Richard Heck schreef op 18-4-2014 0:33:
I now have all binaries for 2.0.8, and Stephan just emailed a link to
the OSX one for 2.1.0, so I take it we are just about good to go. How
shall we proceed here, to avoid confusion for people? Release the same
day? One one day and one the next? Or...?
2014-04-18 0:33 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck:
> I now have all binaries for 2.0.8, and Stephan just emailed a link to the
> OSX one for 2.1.0, so I take it we are just about good to go. How shall we
> proceed here, to avoid confusion for people? Release the same day? One one
> day and one the next? Or..
Am 18.04.2014 um 07:55 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> Jerry wrote:
>> On Apr 16, 2014, at 11:17 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Am 14.04.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
>>> The package for mac is here:
>>>
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg
>>> https:/
Jerry wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2014, at 11:17 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Am 14.04.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
> > The package for mac is here:
> >
> > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg
> > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2
On Apr 16, 2014, at 11:17 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 14.04.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
>>
>> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
>>
>> As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binarie
ᐧ
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
> > I feel we need to either modify the man page according to the present
> > behavior or make a change in the script to have a uniform behavior.
>
> Can you create the patch for the man page?
>
I made the requir
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 06:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Richard Heck wrote:
>>> I now have all binaries for 2.0.8, and Stephan just emailed a link to the
>>> OSX one for 2.1.0, so I take it we are just about good to go. How shall
>>> we
>>> proceed here, to avoid confusion for people?
On 04/17/2014 06:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I now have all binaries for 2.0.8, and Stephan just emailed a link to the
OSX one for 2.1.0, so I take it we are just about good to go. How shall we
proceed here, to avoid confusion for people? Release the same day? One one
day and o
Richard Heck wrote:
> I now have all binaries for 2.0.8, and Stephan just emailed a link to the
> OSX one for 2.1.0, so I take it we are just about good to go. How shall we
> proceed here, to avoid confusion for people? Release the same day? One one
> day and one the next? Or...?
There was one
Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
> I feel we need to either modify the man page according to the present
> behavior or make a change in the script to have a uniform behavior.
Can you create the patch for the man page?
Pavel
I now have all binaries for 2.0.8, and Stephan just emailed a link to
the OSX one for 2.1.0, so I take it we are just about good to go. How
shall we proceed here, to avoid confusion for people? Release the same
day? One one day and one the next? Or...?
Richard
A cleaned-up version of this patch has been committed to
features/str-metrics now. I encourage every person who feels bored
enough to take a look at this branch and report bugs. At this point, it
is mostly feature-complete. I'd like to fix the most embarassing bugs
that might be found before la
- Original Message -
From: Vincent van Ravesteijn
To: Alex Vergara Gil ; lyx-devel
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: about sourceForge
This is not relevant to LyX, because we don't use sourceforge for any
official distribution.
Vincent
Oh, good then
Alex Vergara Gil schreef op 16-4-2014 20:13:
dear developers
I will only mention this fact so you can decide if you agree or not
taked from:
http://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/notepad-new-site-notepad-plus-plus.org.html
Since January 2010, SourceForge has complied with US law to deny
si
14 matches
Mail list logo
