Op 9-9-2013 21:47, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 9-9-2013 1:55, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Georg Baum wrote:
OK to go in?
I tested this patch helps here.
We are still having the problem I registered some time ago with
cleaning up the tree from new pot files:
It works for m
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 9-9-2013 1:55, Pavel Sanda schreef:
>> Georg Baum wrote:
>>> OK to go in?
>> I tested this patch helps here.
>>
>> We are still having the problem I registered some time ago with
>> cleaning up the tree from new pot files:
>
> It works for me.
Yep, JMarc committe
In article <5225ad48.2050...@lyx.org>,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 31/08/2013 14:47, pdv:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've build LyX+Qt5.2 using CMake and XCode and needed to make the
> > following changes (see 3 attached patch files):
>
> Hello,
>
> Is this for branch 2.0.x or for master? Indeed it
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I noticed that in src/Makefile.am there is still "check_PROGRAMS:
> check_layout" left. I guess this should be removed.
That was my first thought as well, but it does not work if you remove this:
There would be no rule to build check_layout. I'll submit the patch
Op 9-9-2013 1:55, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Georg Baum wrote:
OK to go in?
I tested this patch helps here.
We are still having the problem I registered some time ago with
cleaning up the tree from new pot files:
It works for me.
Vincent
Op 9-9-2013 15:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef:
28/08/2013 22:45, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Hi all,
I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can
release beta2.
Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to
overlook them.
What is the status of t
28/08/2013 22:45, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Hi all,
I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can
release beta2.
Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to
overlook them.
What is the status of the features/kill-tex2lyx-define branch?
Can we me
Op 8-9-2013 19:40, Georg Baum schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Ok, thanks for having a look at it.
I came up with a rather basic version. I did not test the new targets with
anything else than GNU make and GNU bash, but since they are mainly for our
own use I don't consider this a proble
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Is it OK now? What I did is to avoid keeping the files in the first place.
Seems to work. Pavel
09/09/2013 11:53, Pavel Sanda:
commit ddea97e8eb2402f77310af671b22ac05683e6ab5
Author: Pavel Sanda
Date: Mon Sep 9 02:52:38 2013 -0700
* INSTALL - move comment from trunk.
Thanks.
JMarc
07/09/2013 18:48, Hashini Senaratne:
Yes I think I got what you have said. Also I remember you explained this to
me earlier. But I was wandering why it would be hard to fix this, and if
anyone has found a fix for this by any chance. It seems like to fix this,
need to change the design of math ins
09/09/2013 01:55, Pavel Sanda:
We are still having the problem I registered some time ago with
cleaning up the tree from new pot files:
ERROR: files left in build directory after distclean:
./po/languages_l10n.pot
./po/qt4_l10n.pot
./po/layouts_l10n.pot
./po/formats_l10n.pot
./po/latexfonts_l10n
Stephan Witt writes:
> Am 09.09.2013 um 11:27 schrieb Rainer M Krug :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I would like to test the LyX beta, but would like to have it alongside
>> the regular LyX installation. Under Ubuntu, the version name was
>> included in the application name - would this be possible for Mac as
>
Am 09.09.2013 um 11:27 schrieb Rainer M Krug :
> Hi
>
> I would like to test the LyX beta, but would like to have it alongside
> the regular LyX installation. Under Ubuntu, the version name was
> included in the application name - would this be possible for Mac as
> well? In addition, this would
Hi
I would like to test the LyX beta, but would like to have it alongside
the regular LyX installation. Under Ubuntu, the version name was
included in the application name - would this be possible for Mac as
well? In addition, this would make it easily possible to have several
versions installed a
Op 9-9-2013 11:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef:
06/09/2013 14:35, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Are you asking me? This is too much autotools for me to say something
wise about it.
All I can do is to ask people to test. If no-one reports a problem, it
will be ok.
Well, I pushed it for maximal expo
06/09/2013 14:35, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Are you asking me? This is too much autotools for me to say something
wise about it.
All I can do is to ask people to test. If no-one reports a problem, it
will be ok.
Well, I pushed it for maximal exposure :) I will revert as needed.
JMarc
Op 8-9-2013 19:40, Georg Baum schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Ok, thanks for having a look at it.
I came up with a rather basic version. I did not test the new targets with
anything else than GNU make and GNU bash, but since they are mainly for our
own use I don't consider this a proble
18 matches
Mail list logo
