unicodesymbols and tex2lyx

Unicode experts, I just failed to correctly import .tex file into lyx, more precisely while \'a gets correctly translated into á, \'i is not translated and you see only ERT with the \'i. Looking into unicodesymbols file the difference seems to be clear: 0x00e1 "\\'{a}" "" "matha

difficulty getting variable value to reflect whether checkbox is checked/unchecked

I'm trying to figure out how to add an option to write CSS generated during XHTML export to a separate directory, but I'm running into some difficulties. I've pushed my attempt to a new branch in the GSoC repo as seen here: http://git.lyx.org/?p=gsoc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/xhtml/new_features/c

Re: [PATCH] Fix Qt5 decimal separator bug

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:32:27PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > I think another move would be better: the internal representation of > numeric values as strings is not a good idea. The code looks much > nicer when making the font_sizes an array of double values. > > Of course making the font_size

Re: lyx-tester

Am Freitag, 26. Juli 2013 um 15:34:43, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > > > I would be very interested in a unit test framework but I do not know > > how to set that up. > > > > Scott > > I have a branch in my personal repo that has a unit testing framework > base on google test. > > http:/

Re: LyX-2.1.0beta1 on FTP

On 07/26/2013 10:07 AM, Richard Heck wrote: On 07/26/2013 09:18 AM, John Kennan wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn lyx.org> writes: The source code and Windows installer for LyX-2.1.0beta1 are now available at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta1/ Editing and saving a fi

Re: LyX-2.1.0beta1 on FTP

On 07/26/2013 09:18 AM, John Kennan wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn lyx.org> writes: The source code and Windows installer for LyX-2.1.0beta1 are now available at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta1/ Editing and saving a file makes it unreadable on 2.0.6 (Windows XP)

Re: lyx-tester

Op 25-7-2013 19:39, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Another thing is that we probably don't want to test the documents in the attic directory. I've changed my mind a couple of times on this. Right now my opinion is that I disagree. It de

Re: lyx-tester

I would be very interested in a unit test framework but I do not know how to set that up. Scott I have a branch in my personal repo that has a unit testing framework base on google test. http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/vfr/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/tests Vincent

Re: LyX-2.1.0beta1 on FTP

26/07/2013 15:18, John Kennan: Vincent van Ravesteijn lyx.org> writes: The source code and Windows installer for LyX-2.1.0beta1 are now available at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta1/ Editing and saving a file makes it unreadable on 2.0.6 (Windows XP) It gives a

Re: LyX-2.1.0beta1 on FTP

Vincent van Ravesteijn lyx.org> writes: > > The source code and Windows installer for LyX-2.1.0beta1 are now > available at > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0beta1/ > Editing and saving a file makes it unreadable on 2.0.6 (Windows XP) It gives a message about a Buffer

Re: [BUG] Langauge Change When Outputting Optional Argument

Jürgen Spitzmüller lyx.org> writes: > > 2013/3/19 Richard Heck lyx.org>: > > If this one is fixed in trunk, we could leave it there. It's a pretty > > obscure bug. > > We need to check. If someone has a recipe for the bug, please test. > > Jürgen > > > rh > > > > I'm using Lyx 2.0.6 in G

Re: Row by Row sliding (review of 095060cfcaa8f)

26/07/2013 10:54, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: I continue my backwards visit of history. I forgot a couple of remarks in this commit. - RowPainter rp(pi, *text_, pit, row, bidi, x, y); + + cur.setTargetX(); Do you really need to set targetX? This seems plain wrong to me

Re: automake 1.14

26/07/2013 10:54, Stephan Witt: This works for me and I need this change because I have automake 1.14 now. So, may I commit it? The same patch is needed for 2.0.X. I think you should. JMarc

Re: Row by Row sliding (review of 27fbf20e9b)

As a preamble, the most important remark is that you should never declare methods and members in a commit and implement them in anothe rone. Each commit should be self contained and leave the trunk compilable. The idea is not to commit file-by-file, but function-by-function. JMarc +++ b/src/

Re: Row by Row sliding (review of

I continue the review. Coding style point: please leave two empty lines between method definitions. JMarc +++ b/src/Cursor.cpp @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ CursorData::CursorData(DocIterator const & dit) // bv functions are not yet available! Cursor::Cursor(BufferView & bv) : CursorData(&bv.bu

Re: Row by Row sliding (review of 095060cfcaa8f)

I continue my backwards visit of history. JMarc +++ b/src/TextMetrics.cpp @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ */ #include - #include "TextMetrics.h" There is no reason to delete a line here. You should always before pushing a commit look at the diff and spot this kind of unintented changes. #include

Re: automake 1.14

Am 24.07.2013 um 15:22 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > 24/07/2013 10:09, Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> Is this already committed, or can anyone say something smart about this ? > > The patch is not committed AFAICS. The warning does not hrm, it just tells us > whet is going to happen with automake

Re: Row by Row sliding (review of 78364e430)

Hi Hashinni, I thought I would review your commits to gsoc/master, in reverse order. I start from 78364e430. +++ b/src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp @@ -627,6 +627,17 @@ void GuiWorkArea::Private::showCursor() && !completer_->inlineVisible(); cursor_visible_ = true;