Re: GSOC 2013

"Not officially enrolled" sounds like "not eligible" to me. Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: On 18/04/13 01:46, Cyrille Artho wrote: The criteria are (in a nutshell): * Enrolled in an accredited academic institution. * Eligible to work. * Not citizen or resident of a country that is restricted from co

Re: [LyX master] Hungarian Tutorial.lyx: revert last change

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 13.04.2013 20:45, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >> Yes, what is the protocol for doc files in branch. You are doc >> maintainer and Richard is branch maintainer. Should I get the approval >> of both? > > > For the doc files you can put it in if I g

Re: Beamer goto buttons and text hyperlinks

On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Looking at the docs, I'd propose to make beamergotobutton a flex inset within > beamer.layout. The hyperref inset should be turned into a collapsable inset > (while the dialog is being kept, minus the "name" field), \hyperlink support >

GuiRef patches

Any comments on these? Scott From 699843541e552488f7cf7fdb3c348cb648e8944e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Scott Kostyshak Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 07:48:26 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] GuiRef: only show "" if non-empty If "Group" is checked, "" is shown only if there exists a label with no prefix. B

Re: [LyX master] Also put HTML on the clipboard when copying

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > The branch, master, has been updated. > > - Log - > > commit 0613a218aad1482ff3003a7cc4755c0b9651f3c2 > Author: Georg Baum > Date: Fri Apr 12 22:12:47 2013 +0200 > > Also put

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX and Google Docs

2013/4/19 Gregori Kanatzidis > I've posted in another thread about this, but my company > SpanDeX is > opening up its API and all the OT stuff is already implemented and hosted. > If you're interested we could work with you to figure out how best to go > about it. > It sounds

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX and Google Docs

2013/4/19 Tommaso Cucinotta > > Can I use openshift ? > > why are u mentioning OpenShift ? How is that relevant ? > OpenShift allows you to have a free server-side application. It's from Red Hat. I mentioned XMPP too and asked for more options. I just want to know al

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 17/04/13 02:09, Marcelo Galvăo Póvoa wrote: >> Is it possible to >> write a Pidgin plugin that would serve as a communication channel for >> LyX? > > or perhaps checking whether it would be possible to leverage libpurple for > the pur

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX

hi Tommaso, What according to you would be the best way to implement the lyx-chat project. On 20 April 2013 02:21, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 19/04/13 21:09, Akshay Nautiyal wrote: > > hello everyone, > > I have read the previous post but did not understand the need to use an > external libr

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX

On 17/04/13 02:09, Marcelo Galvão Póvoa wrote: > Is it possible to > write a Pidgin plugin that would serve as a communication channel for > LyX? or perhaps checking whether it would be possible to leverage libpurple for the purpose ? A look at the Pidgin source code to see how it manages all of

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX

On 19/04/13 21:09, Akshay Nautiyal wrote: > hello everyone, > I have read the previous post but did not understand the need to use an > external library when we it is actually not tough to make a mechanism to > receive and parse data(document text) from scratch. it's not about using a library fo

Re: GSoC Project : Advanced Find and Replace

On 18/04/13 06:10, Rajat Gupta wrote: > Hello Community , > I am interested in the "Advanced Find and Replace " project . > I have done a few projects in Qt , thus quite familiar with it . > I am sure i can bring upon the required changes . Please let me know, how to > go about it and would be gre

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX

what about using qxmpp? Thanks. akshay(aksnot) On 20 April 2013 01:39, Akshay Nautiyal wrote: > hello everyone, > I have read the previous post but did not understand the need to use an > external library when we it is actually not tough to make a mechanism to > receive and parse data(document

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX and Google Docs

I've posted in another thread about this, but my company SpanDeX is opening up its API and all the OT stuff is already implemented and hosted. If you're interested we could work with you to figure out how best to go about it. Best, Gregori On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Tomm

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On 18/04/13 05:35, Liviu Andronic wrote: > Tommaso should know more about this, but this specific feature is > already been discussed in a different thread on lyx-devel. Feel free > to join there. Yes, and please have a look at this http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7964 plus scan recent messages

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX and Google Docs

On 18/04/13 02:52, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira wrote: > 2013/4/17 Pavel Sanda mailto:sa...@lyx.org>> > so you are without server side :) the best thing would be to re-use existing server-side frameworks and protocols to vehicle LyX messages. If this is not possible, then we should think abo

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX

hello everyone, I have read the previous post but did not understand the need to use an external library when we it is actually not tough to make a mechanism to receive and parse data(document text) from scratch. cheers, akshay nautiyal On 20 April 2013 01:24, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 17/

Re: GSOC 2013

On 18/04/13 01:46, Cyrille Artho wrote: > The criteria are (in a nutshell): > > * Enrolled in an accredited academic institution. > * Eligible to work. > * Not citizen or resident of a country that is restricted from commerce with > the U.S. > > See > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/document

Re: GSoC 2013: Interactive LyX

On 17/04/13 03:36, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Marcelo Galv?o Póvoa wrote: >> The user-finding issue is a major one. We surely would not want to >> connect to the other party by typing an IP/Port number. This would > > Well, it's the most straightforward way so we should at least allow it. I share the v

Re: hi

On 16/04/13 18:10, Akshay Nautiyal wrote: > hello guys.I am new to this mailing list.I saw the gsoc ideas page of this > organization and i am interested in the project that goes like 'LyX-enhanced > Chat Client'.I have a decent experience of Qt framework and have implement a > few networking pr