On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> may be found at
> http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
> Please test and prepare binaries in the usual way. I'm hoping to announce
> the release officially mid to late next week.
>
Ubuntu binaries are available on the PPA. [1]
Liviu
[1] https:/
On 11/04/2012 10:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
It seems the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. But I wanted to
ask here for feedback.
Please search the archives, it was long story why we don't support xdg-open.
OK
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> It seems the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. But I wanted to
>> ask here for feedback.
>
> Please search the archives, it was long story why we don't support xdg-open.
OK. It looks like a long and intense story
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the intended purpose of the LYX_USE_TR1_REGEX macro, in LyX sources
> ?
Just few days back more people agreed we should get rid of TR1, check threads
around "Re: [PATCH 1/3] Buffer.cpp: drop unused "
Pavel
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> It seems the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. But I wanted to
> ask here for feedback.
Please search the archives, it was long story why we don't support xdg-open.
Pavel
xdg-open tries to open a file with the "preferred" application of a
user for that file on Linux (which is usually the application that is
used when you double click on a file in your desktop environment). I
think the command "open" on Mac does the same thing. I'm guessing
there's a similar Windows
On 11/03/2012 07:45 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
may be found at
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please test and prepare binaries in the usual way. I'm hoping to announce
the release officially mid to late next week.
Works fine on Gentoo x86.
Glad to hear it
rh
On 11/04/2012 01:04 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 04.11.2012 um 00:02 schrieb Richard Heck:
may be found at
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please test and prepare binaries in the usual way. I'm hoping to announce the
release officially mid to late next week.
It works fine on Mac OS X.
I've upl
Am 04.11.2012 um 00:02 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
> may be found at
>http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
> Please test and prepare binaries in the usual way. I'm hoping to announce the
> release officially mid to late next week.
It works fine on Mac OS X.
I've uploaded the packages here:
http://dl.dr
Hi,
what is the intended purpose of the LYX_USE_TR1_REGEX macro, in LyX
sources ?
Is it safe to assume that lyx::regex relies on boost regular expressions ?
If not, then is there any objection if I refer directly to boost::regex
within lyxfind.cpp ?
Thanks,
T.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Andrew U. Frank
wrote:
> dear scott
> i tried to find my comment on the list to respond to but i could not find
> it. (my original post was via email, but can i add to a discussion by
> email?)
When you reply, instead of replying to me, reply to the address
lyx-dev
On 04/11/2012 01:48, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
commit 0a9735c5f7bbbaa24ac2e3e4fa745c6dfbc95a18
Author: Pavel Sanda
Date: Sun Nov 4 01:18:16 2012 +0100
LyX 2.1 will support only Qt>=4.5.
(http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg175737.html)
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Andrew U. Frank
wrote:
> this seems not to be a deb package... i tried to put it in synaptic, but it
> did report problems. is it deb archive?
Hi Andrew,
Please respond to the list.
Try running the following commands:
1. sudo apt-add-repository ppa:lyx-devel/dail
Am 04.11.2012 um 09:23 schrieb Andrew U. Frank :
> i fear i encounter the problem reported in bug 8238:
> how do i get the patch version?
> i have downloaded from lyx dev the version 2.0.4.1
The official version 2.0.5 is coming soon. This bug is fixed then.
You can get the source tarball here: ht
Do you use Ubuntu? If so, Liviu Andronic and Rob Oakes have set up a PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily
Respond (to the list) if you need instructions on how to set that up
(it's easy).
If you don't use Ubuntu, see the instructions in the source tar ball
for how to compile.
Scot
i fear i encounter the problem reported in bug 8238:
how do i get the patch version?
i have downloaded from lyx dev the version 2.0.4.1
thank you!
af
--
-
Prof. Dr. sc.techn. Andrew U. Frank+43 1 58801 12710 direct
Geoinformation, TU Wien+43 1 58801 12700 office
Gussh
16 matches
Mail list logo
