On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/28/2012 11:29 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> Just as the other elements of the Help menu do not have "Manual"
>> appended to their names, I do not think items in the "Specific
>> Manuals" submenu should have "Manual" appended to their
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 29/10/2012 10:24, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>
>>> I would capitalize nevertheless.
>>
>>
>> Updated patch attached. Is it OK?
It's in. Richard, is this OK for branch?
Thanks,
Scott
>
>
> Sure.
>
> JMarc
>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
>
> | I meant gcc 4.4. Qt is 4.6 of course.
>
> When does support of 10.04 stop?
>
> IMHO, when a distro goes into not-supported-mode we should not have to
> care about it anymore. Of course the LTS distros pose a problem in that
> resp
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
>
| Which minimum version of gcc/MSVC is needed for your fun?
I think we have to wait a bit.
I'd prefere c++11 to be out of experimental state in gcc. So gcc 4.8
earliest, alt
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:28:58AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
>
> | Le 29/10/2012 06:36, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
> >> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >> wrote:
> >>> I have 4.4 on my ubuntu 10.04 install.
> >>>
> >> Are you sure? Ub
On 10/28/2012 11:29 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Just as the other elements of the Help menu do not have "Manual"
appended to their names, I do not think items in the "Specific
Manuals" submenu should have "Manual" appended to their names.
Thoughts?
Right.
rh
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
Which minimum version of gcc/MSVC is needed for your fun?
Are there other projects around KDE/Qt already using C++11?
Perhaps the natural time would be when Qt start to use it.
Pavel
Le 29/10/2012 10:24, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I would capitalize nevertheless.
Updated patch attached. Is it OK?
Sure.
JMarc
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> When does support of 10.04 stop?
>
2013-04 [1]. When 2.1 is out Ubuntu Lucid (desktop) will no longer be
supported.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_os#Releases
> IMHO, when a distro goes into not-supported-mode we should not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
| Le 29/10/2012 06:36, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
>> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> wrote:
>>> I have 4.4 on my ubuntu 10.04 install.
>>>
>> Are you sure? Ubuntu Lucid ships Qt 4.6.2 [1].
>> [1]
>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=l
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 29/10/2012 04:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>>
>>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
>
> I think that should be eno
Le 28/10/2012 19:36, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 10/28/2012 02:18 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I think using 4.5 as baseline would be very safe and allow for code
simplification.
Anyone against this?
I know there are sometimes issues with cygwin, so we should wait to hear
Le 29/10/2012 06:36, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
I have 4.4 on my ubuntu 10.04 install.
Are you sure? Ubuntu Lucid ships Qt 4.6.2 [1].
[1]
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libqt4&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
I meant g
Le 29/10/2012 04:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
I think that should be enough. A pointer to the knitr manual in
"Help-->Specific Manuals-->Knitr Manual" can be helpful
14 matches
Mail list logo
