Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 8-10-2012 21:07, Pavel Sanda schreef:
>> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>> I would prefer to have this tab only visible when DEVEL_VERSION is set.
>>> This doesn't provide much help in the released version.
>> Multiple times we had bug reports where users were not
Op 8-10-2012 21:07, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I would prefer to have this tab only visible when DEVEL_VERSION is set.
This doesn't provide much help in the released version.
Multiple times we had bug reports where users were not able report Qt libs used.
IIRC this was r
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I would prefer to have this tab only visible when DEVEL_VERSION is set.
> This doesn't provide much help in the released version.
Multiple times we had bug reports where users were not able report Qt libs used.
IIRC this was readable from the tab and would be usefu
Op 7-10-2012 1:39, Sebastian Audet schreef:
On Windows 7, the cmake build process fails to generate a correct
.vcxproj for the frontend_qt4 project.
The problem is that Visual Studio decided that the header files are
being included twice.
The solution is to not include the header files.
A p
Op 3-10-2012 12:10, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 01/10/2012 08:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
This might encourage users to post this information when reporting bugs
and sometime
Op 5-10-2012 12:39, Kornel Benko schreef:
Hi,
I wanted to add the target makeregfiles to cmake build.
But the tests (in automake) are messing the source tree, which I would
like
to omit in cmake build.
Could they please be rewritten to work in build-tree?
Kornel
Hi Kornel,
These test
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Does it mean that the next step is to rewrite the class descriptions to
> remove the category? Sweet.
Yes.
Jürgen
Le 08/10/2012 11:21, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
I've implemented a long-standing idea to have real textclass categorization
(instead of the limited " (name)" string approach we have now).
Does it mean that the next step is to rewrite the class descriptions to
remove the category? Sweet.
JM
