On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 12:55 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> Are these patches OK for trunk and branch?
>>
> I meant to have said yes here:
They're in.
Thanks,
Scott
>
>
Good for branch, then.
Scott, you know about status.20x,
On Windows 7, the cmake build process fails to generate a correct .vcxproj
for the frontend_qt4 project.
The problem is that Visual Studio decided that the header files are being
included twice.
The solution is to not include the header files.
A patched CMakeLists.txt is attached.
NOTE: while t
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 15:51:54, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Georg Baum wrote:
> > I found out: It comes from LaTeXFeatures::isProvided() when it tests for
> > some features. In this case it is perfectly valid that the font is not
> > found, since XeTeX is used, and it does not need a
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 12:20:24, schrieb Liviu Andronic
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Will now try automake.
> >
> > Same error.
> >
> Should I file this on the bug tracker?
>
> Liviu
I think yes.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
On 10/03/2012 10:02 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I'm intending to freeze strings in preparation for 2.0.5 this weekend, so
if anyone has anything they want to do along those lines
BTW it seems we have regression in branch -- make check do not work anymore:
make[5]: Entering di
On 10/06/2012 12:55 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Are these patches OK for trunk and branch?
I meant to have said yes here:
Good for branch, then.
Scott, you know about status.20x, yes?
I do, but I would have forgotten to update it. Thank you for the reminder.
Attached are the patches for t
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Ah, wrong answer. \pdfbookmark is part of thesis/thesis.lyx (preamble), but
> in my version there was missing \use_hyperref.
OK, so everything seems correct.
Jürgen
Georg Baum wrote:
> I found out: It comes from LaTeXFeatures::isProvided() when it tests for
> some features. In this case it is perfectly valid that the font is not
> found, since XeTeX is used, and it does not need a special definition.
> Therefore the error message is simply wrong here. Howev
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 15:03:56, schrieb Kornel Benko
> > Just to be sure: Where does the \pdfbookmark command come from? Manual
> > insertion in preamble? If it#s automatically inserted by LyX, there is
> > something wrong.
>
> One of the 10 childs uses "\use_hyperref true".
> The mast
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 14:42:16, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > Since oct. 5 the created tex is not compilable.
> > > > Using lualatex I get:
> > > > ...
> > > > ! Undefined control sequence.
> > > > \tableofcontents ->\frontmatter \pdfb
Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Since oct. 5 the created tex is not compilable.
> > > Using lualatex I get:
> > > ...
> > > ! Undefined control sequence.
> > > \tableofcontents ->\frontmatter \pdfbookmark
> > >
> > > [1]{\contentsname
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 14:23:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Since oct. 5 the created tex is not compilable.
> > Using lualatex I get:
> > ...
> > ! Undefined control sequence.
> > \tableofcontents ->\frontmatter \pdfbookmark
> >
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 14:06:24, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 17:57:10, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >
> >> Le 05/10/2012 17:50, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >> > No, cosmetics reasons only. Nothing should mess source tree if one
> >> > wan
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Since oct. 5 the created tex is not compilable.
> Using lualatex I get:
> ...
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \tableofcontents ->\frontmatter \pdfbookmark
> [1]{\contentsname }{} \myTOC
> \m... l.255 \tableofcontents
>
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 14:07:12, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Still problems on tex2lyx.
>
> I noticed that as well. It works now with the latest version.
>
>
> Georg
Confirmed.
K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Still problems on tex2lyx.
I noticed that as well. It works now with the latest version.
Georg
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 17:57:10, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
>> Le 05/10/2012 17:50, Kornel Benko a écrit :
>> > No, cosmetics reasons only. Nothing should mess source tree if one
>> > wants to build outside the source. This way there may be any number of
>> > bui
Since oct. 5 the created tex is not compilable.
Using lualatex I get:
...
! Undefined control sequence.
\tableofcontents ->\frontmatter \pdfbookmark
[1]{\contentsname }{} \myTOC \m...
l.255 \tableofcontents
{}
? q
Farther investig
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Will now try automake.
>
> Same error.
>
Should I file this on the bug tracker?
Liviu
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> If it's not too much of a pain, could you document the packaging
>> procedure for Ubuntu and LyX?
>>
>> At this point it's only a question out of curiosity and not necessity
>> so re
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> If it's not too much of a pain, could you document the packaging
> procedure for Ubuntu and LyX?
>
> At this point it's only a question out of curiosity and not necessity
> so really if it's an extra pain to document it, don't worry about.
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 10:53:05, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 10:21:18, schrieb Liviu Andronic
>
> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Did not try. And did you try cmake? :)
> > >
> > Well, I'd rather not. I am trying to cook 2.1dev for m
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Are you aware of "make package" in cmake? I am using it all the time.
>>
> No, I didn't know that. But since I'm trying to come up with a rather
> specific setup, I need to tinker manua
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Are you aware of "make package" in cmake? I am using it all the time.
>
No, I didn't know that. But since I'm trying to come up with a rather
specific setup, I need to tinker manually with the packaging info.
>
> Will now try automake.
>
Than
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 10:21:18, schrieb Liviu Andronic
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Did not try. And did you try cmake? :)
> >
> Well, I'd rather not. I am trying to cook 2.1dev for my Ubuntu PPA and
> the debian packaging uses autotools,
Are you aware of "
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 17:57:10, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 05/10/2012 17:50, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > No, cosmetics reasons only. Nothing should mess source tree if one wants
> > to build outside the source. This way there may be any number of build trees
> > (each different con
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Did not try. And did you try cmake? :)
>
Well, I'd rather not. I am trying to cook 2.1dev for my Ubuntu PPA and
the debian packaging uses autotools, and I'd rather stick to that (not
least because I'm not very familiar with cmake). So is it pos
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 23:59:25, schrieb Georg Baum
> The branch, master, has been updated.
>
> - Log -
>
> commit fce4f66718dc25e43da1e3f8a144b1f9cb74918e
> Author: Georg Baum
> Date: Fri Oct 5 23:58:16 2012 +0200
>
>
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 23:45:53, schrieb Liviu Andronic
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I, too have Precise ..., so this should not be the reason.
> >
> > > several liboost 1.40.0 libraries laying around.
> >
> > I have too, so no problem either ...
> >
> Hmm, b
29 matches
Mail list logo
