Am 02.07.2012 23:15, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Well, last time I tried, the lyx file format was no longer connected to LyX
after uninstalling an
old LyX version after installing the new one.
I cannot reproduce this anymore. This was a bug but seems to be fixed. However,
before you blame the
install
Am 02.07.2012 11:00, schrieb Liviu Andronic:
Random thought: When using the standalone installer, not the bundle
one, does the same issue exist? Will LyX instruct MiKTeX to install
packages, if missing?
Yes, because we require new packages from time to time or replace a package support by anot
Am 02.07.2012 22:34, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why he
preferred this.
Could you tell me why the code compiled in non-merge mode and not in merge? I
want to avoid such
cases in the future. If necessary I will also compile m
Am 28.06.2012 14:08, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Now I read a bit more the miktexdoc. I suspect that using directly the
PackageInstaller interface
http://docs.miktex.org/2.8/sdk/interfaceIPackageInstaller.html
would help being much faster than the clunky configure.py-based solution.
It is
Am 02.07.2012 22:59, schrieb Richard Heck:
The installer proposed "LyX 2.0.4" as name but you can of course chose any
other name of your
choice. But the average user justs clicks several time OK in an installer and
then gets the
default/proposed folder.
So how about if we propose LyX20, and
Am 02.07.2012 20:51, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
I find the "LyX 2.0.4" naming useful. For example, when LyX moved from 2.0.1 to
2.0.2 it brought
problems on my system: "sticky" scrolling, and memory leakage which caused a
number of crashes,
and I needed to revert to 2.0.1. I like to be ab
On 07/02/2012 04:56 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 02.07.2012 22:47, schrieb Richard Heck:
Isn't it possible for users to choose to install to a different
location if they wish to do so? I'd
have thought the issue here was what we do by default.
The installer proposed "LyX 2.0.4" as name but you ca
Am Montag, 2. Juli 2012 um 22:34:16, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Op 2-7-2012 22:30, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
> >> "-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=0" used on branch,
> >> "-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=1" used in trunk.
> >
> >
> > Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why
> > he preferred this
Am 02.07.2012 22:47, schrieb Richard Heck:
If everything's just being installed to LyX20 or whatever, isn't this issue
resolved?
Yes, but then you cannot have two LyX versions of the same major version side by side. So having LyX
2.0.3 _and_ 2.0.4 is then not possible.
Why should LyX
2.0.
Am 02.07.2012 22:42, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
The point is that you can reinstall 2.0.1 if there is a problem and it will
still work with your
local files and preferences.
Unfortunately not on Windows. The reason is that we deliver stripped-down
versions of ImageMagick,
Ghostscript and Python with
Am 02.07.2012 08:30, schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
I've had no problems uninstalling afterwards. Just to check, I've uninstalled
2.0.3 *after*
installing 2.0.4. No problems (the only thing to remember is *not* to uninstall
preferences). I've
then reinstalled 2.0.3 beside 2.0.4, again without proble
On 07/02/2012 04:42 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 02.07.2012 10:23, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I find the "LyX 2.0.4" naming useful. For example, when LyX moved from
2.0.1 to 2.0.2 it brought problems on my system: "sticky" scrolling,
and
memory leakage which caused a number of crashes, and I ne
Am 02.07.2012 10:23, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I find the "LyX 2.0.4" naming useful. For example, when LyX moved from
2.0.1 to 2.0.2 it brought problems on my system: "sticky" scrolling, and
memory leakage which caused a number of crashes, and I needed to revert
to 2.0.1. I like to be able t
Op 2-7-2012 22:30, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
"-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=0" used on branch,
"-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=1" used in trunk.
Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why
he preferred this.
Could you tell me why the code compiled in non-merge mode and not in
merge? I want to avoi
Am 02.07.2012 21:27, schrieb Kornel Benko:
I also don't understand this and it fails as expected in trunk but not in
branch on my system
However, I now committed a patch that should work. Does this compile for you?
if not, I'll revert my
commits from branch.
thanks and regards
Uwe
Maybe Uw
Am Sonntag, 1. Juli 2012 um 01:49:18, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 30.06.2012 16:39, schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
> >> But he does because it is in anon.
> >
> > Now really. How should compiler know where to look for the variable
> > when its not declared in your .cpp file or included headers?
>
> I also do
Even if we add an option "Surpass the LaTeX package installation" what
do you expect a new user who has never worked with LaTeX nor know what
LaTeX is will do?
"Surpass"? A nice combination of "bypass" and "suppress".
Yeah.. cool huh.
The reason why I don't accept this installer now i
I am still unable to tag 2.0.4, because git refuses to allow it. Can
someone fix this?
Richard
Le 02/07/2012 12:35, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
2012/7/2 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Or the automatic language switching could be removed altogether (since auto
would be the default).
Yes, perhaps. But I'm not sure. Would an "auto" setting, as you
describe it, also switch within the document
2012/7/2 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Or the automatic language switching could be removed altogether (since auto
> would be the default).
Yes, perhaps. But I'm not sure. Would an "auto" setting, as you
describe it, also switch within the document if the language switches?
I know that there are d
Le 02/07/2012 11:16, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
I agree that we should implement this as an additional feature. If we
have this (which should be in the .lyx file format IMHO), we could say
that the automatic language-dependent switching I have implemented is
skipped when "auto" is set.
Or the
2012/7/2 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Thanks. Now that I have tested the patch, I have different proposal that
> would use the framework you have put in place: add a new quote style "auto"
> in the dialog (but probably not in the .lyx file format)
> and input the right type of quotes depending of the cu
Le 02/07/2012 10:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
2012/7/2 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
This patch looks great. It would be nice though to describe the various
quoting styles accepted by QuoteStyle.
Done.
Thanks. Now that I have tested the patch, I have different proposal that
would use the framew
2012/7/2 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> This patch looks great. It would be nice though to describe the various
> quoting styles accepted by QuoteStyle.
Done.
Jürgen
Le 02/07/2012 08:30, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
There is also no reason not to change the name of the folder. I already
also explained that we can easily change the name to somewhat else but
need the info about the bugfix release. If is perfectly valid to install
LyX 2.0.4 and leave 2.0.3 as backup
This patch looks great. It would be nice though to describe the various
quoting styles accepted by QuoteStyle.
JMarc
Le 01/07/2012 11:27, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
--- a/lib/languages
+++ b/lib/languages
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
# PolyglossiaName
# PolyglossiaOpts""
# E
26 matches
Mail list logo
