Re: r40749 - lyx-devel/trunk/po

2012-02-14 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 14.02.2012 um 22:06 schrieb uwesto...@lyx.org: > Author: uwestoehr > Date: Tue Feb 14 22:06:51 2012 > New Revision: 40749 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/40749 > > Log: > ja.po: big update for trunk from Koji > > Modified: > lyx-devel/trunk/po/ja.po > > Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/p

Re: [RFC][trivial PATCH] Remove settings-on-left-click for spaces insets

2012-02-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 13/02/2012 19:32, Richard Heck a écrit : The patch looks like common-sense to me, therefore I expect that some people will disagree. After all, it removes a 'feature'. Therefore I leave this a (short) time window for discussion. This seems good to me. I have the same problem. New version t

Re: is lyx really appropriate for my book.

2012-02-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > When I get a chance, I'm going to put the files I wrote for this on > CTAN. But of course they only cover one of OUP's designs. I plan to put mine there as well eventually (when I'm sure I can provide reasonable support). Jürgen

Re: is lyx really appropriate for my book.

2012-02-14 Thread BH
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 02/14/2012 08:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> >> >> Richard Heck wrote: >> >> > Yes, but then they asked me if I wanted to typeset it myself. I could >> >> > have done it either way, but chose to typeset it. I had the same experience a

Fwd: Re: How to force tex2lyx to read unicode (from within Lyx)?

2012-02-14 Thread Richard Heck
I guess this should have gone to devel. Original Message Subject:Re: How to force tex2lyx to read unicode (from within Lyx)? Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:05:17 +0100 From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes To: lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org Le 14/02/2012 00:47, Richard Heck a écri

Re: is lyx really appropriate for my book.

2012-02-14 Thread Richard Heck
On 02/14/2012 08:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: > Yes, but then they asked me if I wanted to typeset it myself. I could > have done it either way, but chose to typeset it. That's cool. I would be grateful if they only provided classes. I have set up class files for many

Re: is lyx really appropriate for my book.

2012-02-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > Yes, but then they asked me if I wanted to typeset it myself. I could > have done it either way, but chose to typeset it. That's cool. I would be grateful if they only provided classes. I have set up class files for many publishers myself meanwhile. I guess I have to publi

Re: is lyx really appropriate for my book.

2012-02-14 Thread Richard Heck
On 02/14/2012 08:21 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: > > Me, on the contrary, I do not know a single publisher who accepts TeX > > as an input format (this is in the humanities field). > > Oxford. Did you submit your Frege monograph as a TeX file? Yes, but then they asked

Re: is lyx really appropriate for my book.

2012-02-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > > Me, on the contrary, I do not know a single publisher who accepts TeX > > as an input format (this is in the humanities field). > > Oxford. Did you submit your Frege monograph as a TeX file? Jürgen

Re: [RFC][trivial PATCH] Remove settings-on-left-click for spaces insets

2012-02-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 14/02/2012 08:14, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : I would go even farther and remove "clickable" from graphics and external insets as well. What I missing on these, I think is the visual cue that the graphics is clickable. We already have the change of cursor, but the inset should also be high

Re: [RFC][trivial PATCH] Remove settings-on-left-click for spaces insets

2012-02-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >> The patch looks like common-sense to me, therefore I expect that some > >> people will disagree. After all, it removes a 'feature'. Therefore I leave > >> this a (short) time window for discussion. > >> > >> This seems good to me. I have the same problem. > > > > Sam

Re: [patch] support for verbatim

2012-02-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 14/02/2012 00:12, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : OK, now I got it. I'm not sure about Spellcheck 0 because you might want to spell check the content. If the user don#t want this, he can skip it. I agree about the spellcheck part, although I am ready to bet that not wanting spellchack is more common (

Re: google summer of code is starting

2012-02-14 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13/02/12 19:45, stefano franchi wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta > wrote: >> Il 05/02/2012 20:48, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto: >> >>> Op 4-2-2012 21:04, Xu Wang schreef: I remember there was an effort to