Am 14.02.2012 um 22:06 schrieb uwesto...@lyx.org:
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Tue Feb 14 22:06:51 2012
> New Revision: 40749
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/40749
>
> Log:
> ja.po: big update for trunk from Koji
>
> Modified:
> lyx-devel/trunk/po/ja.po
>
> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/p
Le 13/02/2012 19:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
The patch looks like common-sense to me, therefore I expect that some
people will disagree. After all, it removes a 'feature'. Therefore I
leave this a (short) time window for discussion.
This seems good to me. I have the same problem.
New version t
Richard Heck wrote:
> When I get a chance, I'm going to put the files I wrote for this on
> CTAN. But of course they only cover one of OUP's designs.
I plan to put mine there as well eventually (when I'm sure I can provide
reasonable support).
Jürgen
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/14/2012 08:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>>
>>
>> Richard Heck wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, but then they asked me if I wanted to typeset it myself. I could
>>
>> > have done it either way, but chose to typeset it.
I had the same experience a
I guess this should have gone to devel.
Original Message
Subject:Re: How to force tex2lyx to read unicode (from within Lyx)?
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:05:17 +0100
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
To: lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org
Le 14/02/2012 00:47, Richard Heck a écri
On 02/14/2012 08:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
> Yes, but then they asked me if I wanted to typeset it myself. I could
> have done it either way, but chose to typeset it.
That's cool. I would be grateful if they only provided classes. I have
set up class files for many
Richard Heck wrote:
> Yes, but then they asked me if I wanted to typeset it myself. I could
> have done it either way, but chose to typeset it.
That's cool. I would be grateful if they only provided classes. I have set up
class files for many publishers myself meanwhile.
I guess I have to publi
On 02/14/2012 08:21 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
> > Me, on the contrary, I do not know a single publisher who accepts TeX
> > as an input format (this is in the humanities field).
>
> Oxford.
Did you submit your Frege monograph as a TeX file?
Yes, but then they asked
Richard Heck wrote:
> > Me, on the contrary, I do not know a single publisher who accepts TeX
> > as an input format (this is in the humanities field).
>
> Oxford.
Did you submit your Frege monograph as a TeX file?
Jürgen
Le 14/02/2012 08:14, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
I would go even farther and remove "clickable" from graphics and
external insets as well.
What I missing on these, I think is the visual cue that the graphics is
clickable. We already have the change of cursor, but the inset should
also be high
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> The patch looks like common-sense to me, therefore I expect that some
> >> people will disagree. After all, it removes a 'feature'. Therefore I leave
> >> this a (short) time window for discussion.
> >>
> >> This seems good to me. I have the same problem.
> >
>
> Sam
Le 14/02/2012 00:12, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
OK, now I got it.
I'm not sure about
Spellcheck 0
because you might want to spell check the content. If the user don#t
want this, he can skip it.
I agree about the spellcheck part, although I am ready to bet that not
wanting spellchack is more common (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/12 19:45, stefano franchi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta
> wrote:
>> Il 05/02/2012 20:48, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
>>
>>> Op 4-2-2012 21:04, Xu Wang schreef:
I remember there was an effort to
13 matches
Mail list logo