On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Jack Tanner wrote:
>
> OK, this is reproducible for me in 2.0.2 with Sweave (not knitr).
> Insert->Custom Insets->S/R Expression creates an inset that does not take
> input until you double-click it. (Maybe the inset is collapsed by default,
> like Liviu suggested,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Jack Tanner wrote:
> How can I make inline code pay attention to R options, e.g.,
> options(digits=2)?
>
I don't think you can, since \Sexpr{} prints as.character(). See [1].
But I remember that some hacky workarounds exist.
Liviu
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 3:29:01 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
There's some sort of a UI bug, though. Insert->Custom Insets->Sexpr creates
the inset, but I can't type or paste into it. If I click outside of the
inset and then back into the inset, I can type then. Maybe it has to do with
me using knitr
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Jack Tanner wrote:
> Ha! It's like magic. I think of something, and it's already there.
So don't underestimate how heavily we use Sweave/knitr every day :-)
>
> There's some sort of a UI bug, though. Insert->Custom Insets->Sexpr creates
> the inset, but I can't t
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Jack Tanner wrote:
> Ha! It's like magic. I think of something, and it's already there.
>
> There's some sort of a UI bug, though. Insert->Custom Insets->Sexpr creates
> the inset, but I can't type or paste into it.
>
It should work immediately, but what you're pro
Ha! It's like magic. I think of something, and it's already there.
There's some sort of a UI bug, though. Insert->Custom Insets->Sexpr
creates the inset, but I can't type or paste into it. If I click outside
of the inset and then back into the inset, I can type then. Maybe it has
to do with me
Thanks, Liviu. I think that is it.
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Jack Tanner wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Jack Tanner wrote:
> Over the last week or so, I've been playing with the new knitr integration
> (#7887), with really nice results.
>
> There's a very handy Chunk environment for sweave / knitr code. But is there
> any support for inline knitr in LyX? I'm thinking
Over the last week or so, I've been playing with the new knitr
integration (#7887), with really nice results.
There's a very handy Chunk environment for sweave / knitr code. But is
there any support for inline knitr in LyX? I'm thinking of, e.g.,
As our experiments showed, the sum of 1 and
