Re: LyX 2.0.2 Again

2011-11-28 Thread Yihui Xie
Done: https://github.com/yihui/lyx/raw/master/templates/ctex.lyx Thanks! Regards, Yihui -- Yihui Xie Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name Department of Statistics, Iowa State University 2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 28.11.2011 22:42

Export to HTML5

2011-11-28 Thread samar
I would request an export capability to enable HTML5 attributes. The rationale for this request is that although pdf is very useful way of circulating documents, it does not quite present the best medium for presentations in the age of unlimited video and graphics. By contrast HTML5 presents ve

Re: CMake problems was: removing scons

2011-11-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 28.11.2011 12:50, schrieb Peter Kuemmel: Good, you found a solution! Batch scripting seems really ugly indeed I made the script now compilable in trunk (There must not be a linebreak after an "else".) and added a securtiy "" pair. There is another issue I noticed: Even if I just have co

Re: Documentation status for LyX 2.0.x

2011-11-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 28.11.2011 09:54, schrieb PhilipPirrip: What I've sent was a tracking-changes-enabled English version. The first note suggests to do it that way so that translators would know what had been changed. Change tracking was on, but I only saw Japanese characters in your changes, not English one

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Again

2011-11-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 28.11.2011 22:42, schrieb Yihui Xie: I have translated the two notes and put the new version here: https://github.com/yihui/lyx/raw/master/templates/ctex.lyx Thanks, it is now in trunk and after lyx 2.0.2 was released also in branch. For your question in the preamble, yes it looks suspici

Re: CMake problems was: removing scons

2011-11-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 28.11.2011 12:58, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Yes, I raised this issue before and joost fixed this IIRC at that time. How? Do you have a recipe? I would like to fix it in our build script too. This warning is not really important though. I know, but it is a bit annoying that the co

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Source Packages Ready Again

2011-11-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 27.11.2011 15:49, schrieb Richard Heck: The LyX 2.0.2 source package has been updated a bit in response to earlier issues and is again available here: http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/ Please let me know when binaries have been built. Let's try to do the official release by midweek. Works fi

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Again

2011-11-28 Thread Yihui Xie
I have translated the two notes and put the new version here: https://github.com/yihui/lyx/raw/master/templates/ctex.lyx For your question in the preamble, yes it looks suspicious but is necessary. XeTeX will run into problems for ctex without \DeclareRobustCommand\nobreakspace{\leavevmode\nobreak

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Again

2011-11-28 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 28.11.2011 06:32, schrieb Yihui Xie: But Uwe is absolutely right -- we do not really need them. It suffices to only keep the one for article. Can you please have a look at the template file ctex.lyx? I added some notes there that need to be translated. I also think that there is some outda

View>Source Format Always Resets

2011-11-28 Thread Richard Heck
Both in branch and trunk right now, if I choose "LyXHTML", say, as the format for viewing the source, it resets to "Default" as soon as I move the cursor. Do others see this? What's the right approach to fixing it? Richard

Re: Răspuns: Editing wiki pages

2011-11-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 28-11-2011 19:47, Bulletproof Monkey schreef: http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/FilesInTrunk There are some lines that should be edited / deleted by someone more familiar with the repository. I did that. Vincent

Răspuns: Editing wiki pages

2011-11-28 Thread Bulletproof Monkey
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/FilesInTrunk There are some lines that should be edited / deleted by someone more familiar with the repository. On 11/28/2011 02:14 AM, Bulletproof Monkey wrote: Hello. > > >I'm looking into the sources of the LyX. Would it be Ok to

Re: Editing wiki pages

2011-11-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Are the informations in http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Git up to date? Your best bet for using Git is now the following repo. This one is being synchronized with svn: git://gitorious.org/lyx/lyx.git Vincent

Re: Editing wiki pages

2011-11-28 Thread Richard Heck
On 11/28/2011 02:14 AM, Bulletproof Monkey wrote: Hello. I'm looking into the sources of the LyX. Would it be Ok to Edit the wiki pages (like http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/FilesInTrunk) as I go? I see that LyX password works. Absolutely, that would be great. Are the informations in http://wik

2.0.2 Binaries for Testing

2011-11-28 Thread Richard Heck
If anyone wants to test the Windows and OSX binaries before we do the official release, you can download them from here: http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/ Please note that these are for testing only at this point. Assuming no issues, we will do the official release probably tomorrow. Richard

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Source Packages Ready Again

2011-11-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 28/11/2011 14:26, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lyx.org> writes: It would be nice to have a short recipe to reproduce it. Try this: - create a short file with plain text into it; - open lyx-2.0.2; - open a new file - perform Insert>File>Plain text... You sh

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Source Packages Ready Again

2011-11-28 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lyx.org> writes: > > It would be nice to have a short recipe to reproduce it. Try this: - create a short file with plain text into it; - open lyx-2.0.2; - open a new file - perform Insert>File>Plain text... You should get it... BTW, it was already present with 2.0.0.

Re: CMake problems was: removing scons

2011-11-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 28 nov. 2011 12:49 schreef "Peter Kuemmel" het volgende: > > > Original-Nachricht > > Datum: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 01:54:21 +0100 > > Von: "Uwe Stöhr" > > An: > > CC: "Peter Kümmel" , LyX-Devel < lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org> > > Betreff: Re: CMake problems was: removing scons > > > Am

Re: CMake problems was: removing scons

2011-11-28 Thread Peter Kuemmel
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 02:27:09 +0100 > Von: "Uwe Stöhr" > An: > CC: "Peter Kümmel" , LyX-Devel > Betreff: Re: CMake problems was: removing scons > Am 28.11.2011 01:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > > I will report if branch works too. > > I had to modify the

Re: CMake problems was: removing scons

2011-11-28 Thread Peter Kuemmel
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 01:50:27 +0100 > Von: "Uwe Stöhr" > An: "Peter Kümmel" > CC: LyX-Devel > Betreff: Re: CMake problems was: removing scons > Am 14.11.2011 09:30, schrieb Peter Kümmel: > > >>> Can anybody help me please? > > > > Somehow reusing PATH

Re: CMake problems was: removing scons

2011-11-28 Thread Peter Kuemmel
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 01:54:21 +0100 > Von: "Uwe Stöhr" > An: > CC: "Peter Kümmel" , LyX-Devel > Betreff: Re: CMake problems was: removing scons > Am 28.11.2011 01:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > > After some fiddling I got it to compile. > > There is one

Fwd: Re: r40285 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_2_0_X/development/cmake

2011-11-28 Thread Peter Kuemmel
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:32:54 +0100 Von: "Peter Kuemmel" An: Joost Verburg , v...@lyx.org Betreff: Re: r40285 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_2_0_X/development/cmake Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:23:40 -0500 > Von: Joost Ver

Re: Documentation status for LyX 2.0.x

2011-11-28 Thread PhilipPirrip
On 11/28/2011 01:18 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: But one question? Do you know Japanese? Haha. A good one. No, I do not know. Or, at least, I know it as much as you did when you said that the Japanese version needed an update. I suggested to copy the changes into the other files in English so t