Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > 8. What does the language package setting "automatic" in the menu > Document->Settings->Language do? I played a bit but the language package > is always babel. Is there a case where it is not babel? Yes, if you use XeTeX and if the used languages are covered by polyglossia, it

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

Richard Heck wrote: > > 14. In the document settings one can set different bibliography > > generators. What are the differences between biber, bibtex and bibtex8? > > bibtex8 allows 8-bit characters; biber (which is written in Perl) allows > full Unicode. bibtex itself will sometimes tolerate bot

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

On 08/08/2011 10:50 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > 13. In http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX20#modules there is the entry > for fixltx2e. This module does only add \usepackage{fixltx2e} to the > preamble, but this could also be done before. What is the benefit of > this module. > I think it was added just

second round: questions to be able to update the docs

Am 08.08.2011 05:24, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I'm currently finishing the doc update for 2.0.x. For some new features I need your help: 8. What does the language package setting "automatic" in the menu Document->Settings->Language do? I played a bit but the language package is always babel. Is the

Re: Anyone on Qt 4.8 prerelease?

On 08/08/2011 02:46 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 06.08.2011 18:59, schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> >>> is there any objections if i retarget some months or even yers old >>> bugs with 2.0.1 milestone to 2.0.x? >> No. Please go on if Richard agrees too because this will allow us to have a

Re: Anyone on Qt 4.8 prerelease?

On 08/08/2011 02:46 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 06.08.2011 18:59, schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> >>> is there any objections if i retarget some months or even yers old >>> bugs with 2.0.1 milestone to 2.0.x? >> No. Please go on if Richard agrees too because this will allow us to have a

Re: Anyone on Qt 4.8 prerelease? (was: 2.0.1 milestone bugs)

Pavel Sanda wrote: > there is one bug == http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7695

Anyone on Qt 4.8 prerelease? (was: 2.0.1 milestone bugs)

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 06.08.2011 18:59, schrieb Pavel Sanda: > >> is there any objections if i retarget some months or even yers old >> bugs with 2.0.1 milestone to 2.0.x? > > No. Please go on if Richard agrees too because this will allow us to have a > better overview about pending patches etc..

Re: Fwd: Re: Image Lifecycle (Create) Patch - Video

Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > In the case, what further changes/improvements would be needed, and when currently i'm no more able to insert .eps figs without some warning messages about "It was not possible to infer the format from the file contents or its name." edit/create is not enabled even when

Re: About our bug in treating spaces from copied text

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 06.08.2011 17:40, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > >> The attached patch fixes point 1. and the tabulator issue. curious questions: is style.free_spacing == true only for LyX-Code (i.e. can't we break some other environments by sudden replacing ~ -> '\ ' ? > + // we need a normal sp

Re: small feature request - center graphics

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 04.08.2011 18:42, schrieb James Sutherland: > > > I would like to request that floating graphics and table environments be >> centered by default. They are currently left-justified. This is >> particularly awkward since the caption is cente

Re: questions to be able to update the docs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > We need it to export from LyX to anything. I suppose it's only useful in > > the export dialog if you use the "send to" feature (i.e. enter a > > command in the dialog's lower widget). > > How does the "send to" feature works? This is the first time I hear that LyX > offers th

Re: questions to be able to update the docs

Am 08.08.2011 09:01, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: 1. What is the difference between export formats LaTeX(pdflatex), LaTeX(XeTeX) and LaTeX(LuaTeX). I know what the pdflatex variant is doing, but what do the other variants do compared to pdflatex? The different processors need some different LaT

LiveCD space and gcc-4.6's whole program optimization.

Apparently executable size can shrink by over a third when compiled with -flto + -fuse-linker-plugin + -fwholeprogram and other performance neutral optimizations can be used to shrink executable size further, to 60% of original. (See [1]) Rebuilding executables with ftlo could be another optio

Re: questions to be able to update the docs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > 1. What is the difference between export formats LaTeX(pdflatex), > LaTeX(XeTeX) and LaTeX(LuaTeX). I know what the pdflatex variant is doing, > but what do the other variants do compared to pdflatex? The different processors need some different LaTeX output. The most visible