FancyLineEdit.h not found (Lucid

2011-06-22 Thread John McCabe-Dansted
In file included from ui_DocumentUi.h:23, from GuiDocument.h:25, from GuiDocument.cpp:14: PanelStack.h:16:27: error: FancyLineEdit.h: No such file or directory In file included from ui_DocumentUi.h:23, from GuiDocument.h:25, from G

Re: Debian Folder for LyX

2011-06-22 Thread Richard Kleeman
Can't you get it by grabbing the 3 source packages from here: http://packages.debian.org/sid/lyx (see section on right) and execute dpkg-source -x lyx_2.0.0-1.dsc Descend into the subdirectory lyx_2.0.0 and you will find it. On 06/22/2011 01:23 PM, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear Developers, The recent

Re: Preventing newline after a LatexType = Command line

2011-06-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:47:08AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > At the very end of Text::getStatus(), we have: > > if (code != NO_CODE > && (cur.empty() > || !cur.inset().insetAllowed(code) > || cur.paragraph().layout().pass_thru)) > enable = false; > > This obviously disables

Re: 1.6.10 does not compile on Debian wheezy

2011-06-22 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Am Tuesday, 21. June 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I tried to compile 1.6.10 on Debian wheezy and got > > > > CXXInsetInclude.lo > > > > insets/InsetInclude.cpp: In member function ???const > > lyx::support::FileNameList& lyx::InsetInclude::getBibfiles

Debian Folder for LyX

2011-06-22 Thread Rob Oakes
Dear Developers, The recent discussion of creating a daily build of LyX made me think that I should probably spend a bit of time and update the package archive I maintain for Ubuntu. However, while working on this, I realized something: I don't have a copy of the debian folder needed for creati

Re: Preventing newline after a LatexType = Command line

2011-06-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
(moving to lyx-devel Le 22/06/2011 14:47, Richard Heck a écrit : At the very end of Text::getStatus(), we have: if (code != NO_CODE && (cur.empty() || !cur.inset().insetAllowed(code) || cur.paragraph().layout().pass_thru)) enable = false; This obviously disables every

Re: Packaged Devel Versions?

2011-06-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > > To rephrase: anybody interested in takink the openSUSE build service > > forward approach forward? > > This looks like it could be a very flexible solution. I had a quick look at it. The web interface (which I have already used for other projects and which is really simpl

Re: Packaged Devel Versions?

2011-06-22 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/22/2011 04:00 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller > wrote: > > Rainer M Krug wrote: > > But we should also not forget all the other distros - obviously > one can not > > produce binaries for all, but SuSe ha

Re: Packaged Devel Versions?

2011-06-22 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Rainer M Krug wrote: > > But we should also not forget all the other distros - obviously one can > not > > produce binaries for all, but SuSe has (had?) a building service similar > to > > launchpad, which could be used for the same pur

Re: Packaged Devel Versions?

2011-06-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Rainer M Krug wrote: > But we should also not forget all the other distros - obviously one can not > produce binaries for all, but SuSe has (had?) a building service similar to > launchpad, which could be used for the same purpose The openSuse build service supports not only openSuse packaging. It

Re: Packaged Devel Versions?

2011-06-22 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > > > > I have started to wonder if it might be a good idea somewhere to make > > devel versions of the binaries available, if it isn't too much trouble > > for our packagers. We often se