On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
> Unless you configure with the flag --with-version-suffix, then both 1.6 and
> 2.0 will be installed as "lyx". Use the flag when compiling RC2, and you
> will install as "lyx-2.0.0rc2" and it can live side-by-side with other
> versions of lyx.
On 10.04.2011 00:51, Julien Rioux wrote:
>>
>> I realize that LyX 2.0 is not ready for release yet, but I'm still excited
>> to try it.
>>
Not ready? Only because of the corrupted 1.6 installation or have you found
other issues?
Peter
On 09.04.2011 14:20, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> Is that only me experimenting this ?
>
> See the message I just posted. You have to
>
> #include
>
> in lstrings.cpp.
>
> However, I wonder whether r38320 was a good idea during the freeze we just
> have.
Removed it
On 09/04/2011 3:46 PM, Gustavo Goretkin wrote:
I'm running Ubuntu 10.10 and have been using LyX 1.6. I compiled LyX2.0 RC2
and it seems to have clobbered my LyX 1.6 installation a bit.
For example, when I make a new file, I get a few message boxes like: "LyX:
Document class not available. The la
I always saw those two warnings (paraphrased):
Lexer.cpp:197 may be used uninitialized
Server.cpp:1018 ignoring return value of write(...)
I have looked into these two warnings to learn a bit more on cpp.
For the first one, I could remove the warning by removing the anonymous
namespace, but I
I'm running Ubuntu 10.10 and have been using LyX 1.6. I compiled LyX2.0 RC2
and it seems to have clobbered my LyX 1.6 installation a bit.
For example, when I make a new file, I get a few message boxes like: "LyX:
Document class not available. The layout file requested by this document,
article lay
On 9-4-2011 23:50, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Is that only me experimenting this ?
See the message I just posted. You have to
#include
in lstrings.cpp.
However, I wonder whether r38320 was a good idea during the freeze we just
have.
secondly would
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > Is that only me experimenting this ?
>
> See the message I just posted. You have to
>
> #include
>
> in lstrings.cpp.
>
> However, I wonder whether r38320 was a good idea during the freeze we just
> have.
secondly wouldn't be better to
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Is that only me experimenting this ?
See the message I just posted. You have to
#include
in lstrings.cpp.
However, I wonder whether r38320 was a good idea during the freeze we just
have.
Jürgen
Is that only me experimenting this ?
make[5]: ingresso nella directory
"/home/tommaso/lyx-trunk-ws/lyx-trunk/src/support"
CXX lstrings.o
lstrings.cpp: In function ‘lyx::docstring lyx::support::bformat(const
lyx::docstring&, Arg1) [with Arg1 = lyx::docstring]’:
lstrings.cpp:1331: error: ‘cout’
kuemmel wrote:
> Author: kuemmel
> Date: Sat Apr 9 11:42:52 2011
> New Revision: 38320
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38320
>
> Log:
> temporary code to find bug #7371
doesn't compile here without included
Jürgen
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> Dear LyX devs,
>
> I discovered LyX sometime in 2007 (LyX 1.4.3?) and it served wonderfully for
> the kind of tasks that my dear old Word 95 simply couldn't handle -- big
> mathematics documents full of equations and diagrams and cross-refer
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Sam Lewis
wrote:
> Inon Sharony TAU.ac.IL> writes:
>
>
>> As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the
>> \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file
>> should be saved as.
>>
>> Do you agree?
>
> No really. I
Dear LyX devs,
I discovered LyX sometime in 2007 (LyX 1.4.3?) and it served wonderfully
for the kind of tasks that my dear old Word 95 simply couldn't handle --
big mathematics documents full of equations and diagrams and
cross-references. It was the cross-references that seemed to grind Word
Inon Sharony TAU.ac.IL> writes:
> As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the
> \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file
> should be saved as.
>
> Do you agree?
No really. I normally add the title as the last thing, long after havin
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Sam Lewis
wrote:
>
>> Why don't we add an option in the Tools -> Preferences (and maybe in
>> Document -
>> Settings too) dialog to show
>> only the most important options, you know, that "basic" and "expert"
>
> Are not most LyX users "expert" users anyway?
>
In
> Why don't we add an option in the Tools -> Preferences (and maybe in Document
> -
> Settings too) dialog to show
> only the most important options, you know, that "basic" and "expert"
Are not most LyX users "expert" users anyway?
Cheers, Sam
Le 08/04/11 21:04, Diego Queiroz a écrit :
But this should not be a big deal.
Every general purpose system has lots of options and customizations.
LyX has an option to set if you prefer a single close button instead of
one for each tab, so what's wrong in adding a new option like this?
I think
18 matches
Mail list logo
