Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Juergen, can this go in?
OK.
Jürgen
sanda wrote:
> #: lib/layouts/lettre.layout:260
> -#, fuzzy
> msgid "Office:"
> -msgstr "Vypnuto"
> +msgstr "Office:Office:"
one paste too much?
Jürgen
Richard Heck wrote:
> I could be wrong, but it seems to me that the problems must have lay mostly
> at (i). But (i) is the same both times.
that was my naive view too, haven't seen the code. if its true we can try it,
but this must go soon to have some testing time.
pavel
On 10/17/2010 04:19 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
#412: Opening the box of QProcess short before a release?
I don't know if this is a good idea. We had so much problems
when introducing unblocked texing, so I think we should
postpone it.
i thought that once we have it for
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Tue Oct 12 22:08:58 2010
> New Revision: 35617
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35617
>
> Log:
> Tested autoconf 2.68
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/autogen.sh
>
> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/autogen.sh
>
Am 17.10.2010 21:57, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Why would closing trunk for new features _assure_ getting a beta out ?
This prevents us from introducing new bugs and regressions. (An example of a newly introduced
regression is for example http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6943)
At some po
Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 22:19 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > #412: Opening the box of QProcess short before a release?
> > I don't know if this is a good idea. We had so much problems
> > when introducing unblocked texing, so I think we should
> > postpone it.
>
> i tho
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> #412: Opening the box of QProcess short before a release?
> I don't know if this is a good idea. We had so much problems
> when introducing unblocked texing, so I think we should
> postpone it.
i thought that once we have it for viewing, it might be piece of cake
to add exp
Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 18:32 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> kuem...@lyx.org wrote:
> > Author: kuemmel
> > Date: Sun Oct 17 12:44:53 2010
> > New Revision: 35662
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35662
> >
> > Log:
> > Use DispatchResult also in GuiView::dispatchVC to handle messages.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Nice! But to assure that we achieve this can you close trunk for new
> features soon? Trunk should only be open for bugfixes and documentation.
basically it is releasing beta which makes closure for new features. its not
such big deal if there are bugs in beta1, everybody will
On 10/17/2010 06:44 AM, kuem...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: kuemmel
Date: Sun Oct 17 12:44:53 2010
New Revision: 35662
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35662
Log:
Use DispatchResult also in GuiView::dispatchVC to handle messages.
Make it possible to suppress messages stored in DispatchResult ob
Op 17-10-2010 20:31, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
> to sum it up, beta is doable
> at the end of October or on the very beginning of November - now for
real.
Nice! But to assure that we achieve this can you close trunk for new
features soon? Trunk should only be open for bugfixes and documentation.
Can someone who actually understands that stuff have a look at the
attached and tell me if it is OK?
Thanks,
Richard
Index: src/Buffer.cpp
===
--- src/Buffer.cpp (revision 35669)
+++ src/Buffer.cpp (working copy)
@@ -70
Am 15.10.2010 um 21:28 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 15.10.2010 um 18:00 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> this is already bug #chrrm (bugzilla is down).
>>
>> #6396
>
> Ok, thanks.
An attempt to attack it (together with repoUpdate implementation) is attached...
I tried to make
> to sum it up, beta is doable
> at the end of October or on the very beginning of November - now for real.
Nice! But to assure that we achieve this can you close trunk for new features soon? Trunk should
only be open for bugfixes and documentation.
regards Uwe
Richard Heck wrote:
>> Richard, was the last movement in lyx2lyx fixing this or we wait for
>> something else?
>>
>>
> No, that was JMarc's other request. I'll have a look early next week at
> this bit.
thanks, give me hint once its finished ;)
pavel
On 10/17/2010 12:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I've lost track, I'm afraid, of which patch set is which. Here's what I've
got.
i have flagged this message from JMarc in case it makes the things more clear:
I would like to have the ne
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > i tried to be transparent and listed exactly 4 bugs which are in my
> opinion
> > before-beta stuff
>
> So I missed this post from you but cannot find it in the archives. What are
> these 4 bugs?
the first point of this thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx
> i tried to be transparent and listed exactly 4 bugs which are in my opinion
> before-beta stuff
So I missed this post from you but cannot find it in the archives. What are
these 4 bugs?
thanks and regards
Uwe
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > I've lost track, I'm afraid, of which patch set is which. Here's what I've
> > got.
>
> i have flagged this message from JMarc in case it makes the things more clear:
>
> >I would like to have the newlineisparbreak part, which is important for
> >swea
kuem...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: kuemmel
> Date: Sun Oct 17 12:44:53 2010
> New Revision: 35662
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35662
>
> Log:
> Use DispatchResult also in GuiView::dispatchVC to handle messages.
> Make it possible to suppress messages stored in DispatchResult objects.
> B
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> > the most problematic cases of our copy&paste typically happen when
> > middle button is used for getting, or puting stuff from/into another
> > applications and when more lyx instances are used. dunno whether
> > the patch affects these use cases... its very fragile s
22 matches
Mail list logo
