El Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:59:55 +0200
Jürgen Spitzmüller escribió:
> Jack Desert wrote:
>
> > Here is a patch to configure LyxBlogger in 1.6.x.
> >
> > Jurgen, are you the approval committee for branch patches?
>
> Yes, although "comittee" sound a bit exaggerated ;-)
>
> As to the patch: I am fin
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> 2/ lzma is deprecated by the almost equivalent but gnu .xz format.
>>
>> i know and tried both. there was no difference in compression ratio
>> and xz didn't looked to be supported by autotools yet. also except
>> arch, distros seems to accept lzma better.
>
> Suppor
Le 01/04/2010 23:46, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
1/ this means that we require automake 1.11 and autoconf 2.62. We should
make this clear.
you mean to add it to release notes?
No, in autogen.sh and INSTALL. Also in the INIT_AUTOMAKE call.
2/ lzma is deprecated by th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 1/ this means that we require automake 1.11 and autoconf 2.62. We should
> make this clear.
you mean to add it to release notes?
> 2/ lzma is deprecated by the almost equivalent but gnu .xz format.
i know and tried both. there was no difference in compression ratio
Le 30/03/2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
- pass the "noae" option to Sweave to make sure it does not ruin our
font settings.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6624
This one is fixed now.
JMarc
Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit :
On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Pavel Sanda writes:
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
- currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current
locale. This fails as soon as the locale is UTF-8 and the do
Le 01/04/2010 13:21, sa...@lyx.org a écrit :
Log:
Lets make tarballs via lzma instead of bzip2 from now on.
Ratios for alpha1:
tgz 16M
bzip2 12M
lzma 8.7M
That's a good gain indeed. What compression is used for windows
installers, BTW?
Two remarks:
1/ this means that we require automake 1.1
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I don't understand. All I have done was to add a label. I set the label
> text using Qt 4.6 designer. So the code was added by designer, not me.
> I cannot comment on the "font-family:" issue because this was also
> automatically added by designer. (I cannot remember to have us
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW schrieb:
i understand the problem but this is really ugly. we must find
another way.
either shortcuting a-la 'Greyedout color' and the rest in tooltip
or use something else then label.
>>
Why is having a label over 2 lines ugly? Qt supports this and
also many ot
On 04/01/2010 05:32 PM, rgheck wrote:
On 04/01/2010 04:41 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 03/31/2010 05:53 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Dear LyX developers
Would it be a good idea to allow users to edit ERT insets with an
external editor? [snip]
It is a good idea but it sounds a bit complicated
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >Log:
> >Move command line arg --batch to -batch.
> >Things are still bit inconsistent due to the existence of additional --
> switches, but the correct fix is not so easy.
> >
>
> Aren't you now destroying the backward compatibility for all the scripts
> that
Just wanted to pop by to give a well earned praise to the developers
of Lyx.
I am currently using Lyx to compose a two language minutes of meeting,
and a agenda thereof. With at few touches I am able to retain true
tracking and editing in all languages. With branches within tables.
True
>Log:
>Move command line arg --batch to -batch.
>Things are still bit inconsistent due to the existence of additional --
switches, but the correct fix is not so easy.
>
Aren't you now destroying the backward compatibility for all the scripts
that people might have made ?
Isn't it the 'normal' way
On 04/01/2010 05:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jack Desert wrote:
Here is a patch to configure LyxBlogger in 1.6.x.
Jurgen, are you the approval committee for branch patches?
Yes, although "comittee" sound a bit exaggerated ;-)
As to the patch: I am fine with it in general. Howe
On 04/01/2010 04:41 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 03/31/2010 05:53 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Dear LyX developers
Would it be a good idea to allow users to edit ERT insets with an
external editor? [snip]
It is a good idea but it sounds a bit complicated to implement for the
communication of
On 03/31/2010 04:21 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
1. new file
2. insert child doc, eg Additional.lyx
3. console output:
step: Counter does not exist: theorem
step: Counter does not exist: theorem
step: Counter does not exist: theorem
step: Counter does not exist: theorem
step: Counter does not exist: th
Am 31.03.2010 um 19:31 schrieb Micha Feigin:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:35:42 +0200
> Sebastian Rockel wrote:
>
>> Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>
>>> Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref
pane is grayed out:-/
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> If you mean create a project for it with one or more users with pushing
> rigth, yes. If you mean svn2git migration, no.
yes i meant the migration ;)
pavel
On 04/01/2010 12:34 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What about http://gitorious.org/ ? I used that for a project
(http://gitorious.org/sgt in case you're interested) and it works just fine
and reliably.
are you able to setup it? (we would need full history and all bran
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> What about http://gitorious.org/ ? I used that for a project
> (http://gitorious.org/sgt in case you're interested) and it works just fine
> and reliably.
are you able to setup it? (we would need full history and all branches
included).
pavel
Jack Desert wrote:
> Here is a patch to configure LyxBlogger in 1.6.x.
>
> Jurgen, are you the approval committee for branch patches?
Yes, although "comittee" sound a bit exaggerated ;-)
As to the patch: I am fine with it in general. However, as for 1.6.6, we are
almost finished, and I'd like
On 03/31/2010 11:37 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
By the way, the git repository seems to be sleeping since oktober or so ?
yes, its not under our control and maintainer doesn't respond.
other possibility would be to have it on our server, but Christian
didn't l
On 03/31/2010 05:53 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Dear LyX developers
Would it be a good idea to allow users to edit ERT insets with an
external editor? I am thinking of something similar to:
1. Have a "Edit with external editor" entry to the ERT inset context menu
2. When activated, LyX would export
>> i understand the problem but this is really ugly. we must find
another way.
>> either shortcuting a-la 'Greyedout color' and the rest in tooltip
>> or use something else then label.
>
>Why is having a label over 2 lines ugly? Qt supports this and
>also many other applications have this. More
24 matches
Mail list logo
