Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >
> >> no luck. it might be older problem, i'll have a look.
> >> pavel
> >>
> > Is it the same problem as this:
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123158
>
> i have suspiction that movement of VC_ lfuns into GuiView is respo
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
>> no luck. it might be older problem, i'll have a look.
>> pavel
>>
> Is it the same problem as this:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123158
i have suspiction that movement of VC_ lfuns into GuiView is responsible here.
all messages are cleare
no luck. it might be older problem, i'll have a look.
pavel
Is it the same problem as this:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123158
?
Vincent
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Peter, it looks statusbar is somewhat damaged now.
> > previously some LFUNs displayed results through statusbar
> > which is no more true. i only see timestamp(dow we need it?) +name of
> > completed
> > LFUN. for example when we have checked from svn
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Peter, it looks statusbar is somewhat damaged now.
> previously some LFUNs displayed results through statusbar
> which is no more true. i only see timestamp(dow we need it?) +name of
> completed
> LFUN. for example when we have checked from svn tree, one could see on status
>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Christian Ridderström
wrote:
> 2009/12/21 Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW :
>>
>> Christian, you're listed as a contributor to dvipng (so you must be an
>> expert). Do you have any info on this ?
>
> Sorry, I don't have any idea at all about this. (Actually, I wonder
kuem...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: kuemmel
> Date: Mon Dec 21 12:48:19 2009
> New Revision: 32604
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32604
>
> Log:
> Show progress information in status bar.
> Remove progress view because ATM we don't have to show anything usefull.
> move Alert:: void function
> To make things more clear, my main interest with Wave in connection with
> LyX is that I think there are interesting things in Wave as a concept
> which we eventually could incorporate into LyX. (I don't advocate us using
> Wave at this time for developer communication, maybe I never will)
>
