Am Monday 05 October 2009 schrieb you...@lyx.org:
> Author: younes
> Date: Mon Oct 5 00:40:00 2009
> New Revision: 31527
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31527
>
> Log:
> gcc compil fix.
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiApplication.cpp
Next one?
...
cd /usr/BUILD/
http://www.nontoxic.org.uk/?p=124
http://www.wylug.org.uk/2009/09/september-14th/
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> if i do eg vc-update i will close and open the buffer again, so the old
>> buffer/view is no more existing.
>>
>
> In this case we close the buffer so that should stay in GuiView. We indeed
> need to do apply this LFUN to the document buffer only. But GuiView knows
Hi guys,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> - In what form would you like to see the input formats? Would it be
>> enough to output a string like "LyX 1.4,LyX 1.5,LyX 1.6", or something
>> fancier?
>
> If you plan to be backwards compatible for all old formats,
> just the
On 04/10/2009 23:44, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
LyXAction::NoInternal))
+ return false;
+
switch (cmd.action) {
Abdel, why is this not done also in guiview?
Because all Buffer related LFUNs should either be in Buffer or in
BufferVi
On 05/10/2009 00:14, Pavel Sanda wrote:
you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Oct 4 22:58:20 2009
New Revision: 31518
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31518
Log:
Transfer all keyboard related code and actions from LyXFunc to GuiApplication.
Part of it should be transfered l
you...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: younes
> Date: Sun Oct 4 22:58:20 2009
> New Revision: 31518
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31518
>
> Log:
> Transfer all keyboard related code and actions from LyXFunc to
> GuiApplication. Part of it should be transfered later to GuiView and
> BufferVi
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> LyXAction::NoInternal))
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> switch (cmd.action) {
>>>
>>
>> Abdel, why is this not done also in guiview?
>>
>
> Because all Buffer related LFUNs should either be in Buffer or in
> BufferView... But maybe there are still
On 04/10/2009 13:15, Pavel Sanda wrote:
you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Mon Sep 21 14:36:22 2009
New Revision: 31433
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31433
Log:
Introduce a new LyXAction property 'NoInternal' to take care of LFUNs that
should not be applied to internal Buf
Am Sonntag 04 Oktober 2009 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> kornel wrote:
> > Log:
> > Added slovak translation of splash.lyx
>
> Don't forget the Makefiles, SCons, and status.16x.
>
> Jürgen
Ehmm, sorry.
The _only_ build-system which works without change is cmake!
Kornel
signature.asc
kornel wrote:
> Log:
> Added slovak translation of splash.lyx
Don't forget the Makefiles, SCons, and status.16x.
Jürgen
you...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: younes
> Date: Mon Sep 21 14:36:22 2009
> New Revision: 31433
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31433
>
> Log:
> Introduce a new LyXAction property 'NoInternal' to take care of LFUNs that
> should not be applied to internal Buffers and use that in BufferView
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> frontend-* except qt4
I missed this step. No good idea IMHO.
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
are there some objections to put this into trunk?
pavel
> diff --git a/src/LyXRC.cpp b/src/LyXRC.cpp
> index b79d4be..7de65b9 100644
> --- a/src/LyXRC.cpp
> +++ b/src/LyXRC.cpp
> @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ LexerKeyword lyxrcTags[] = {
> { "\\serverpipe", LyXRC::RC_SERVERPIPE },
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > i dont think its worth to preserve it, in the same way as we havent
> > preserved another components deleted last time.
>
> as for example?
frontend-* except qt4
vspace
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> i dont think its worth to preserve it, in the same way as we havent
> preserved another components deleted last time.
as for example?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > we forgot to kill guii component and people are trying
> > to assign to it wrongly. could you remove it now
>
> We cannot remove it, for the sake of bug tracking history. Maybe we can make
> it unselectable?
i dont think its worth to preserve it
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> we forgot to kill guii component and people are trying
> to assign to it wrongly. could you remove it now
We cannot remove it, for the sake of bug tracking history. Maybe we can make
it unselectable?
Jürgen
JMarc,
we forgot to kill guii component and people are trying
to assign to it wrongly. could you remove it now?
pavel
Am Sonntag 04 Oktober 2009 schrieb Hartmut Haase:
> Hi,
> after installing gnuhtml2latex, the command is:
> "htmltolatex -input $$i -output $$o"
> but the error message is still the same:
> "Unable to access jarfile htmltolatex.jar"
Harry, I installed also gnuhtml2latex. But
after reconfiguring I
Hi,
after installing gnuhtml2latex, the command is:
"htmltolatex -input $$i -output $$o"
but the error message is still the same:
"Unable to access jarfile htmltolatex.jar"
--
Viele Grüße,
Hartmut
Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com
Ohne Zensur suchen:
http://suche.amnesty-bergedorf.de/
21 matches
Mail list logo
