Hi Jean-Marc,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
>> This is kind of a chicken-and-egg situation. It is hard to have
>> confidence in a one-man show even if I promise to maintain eLyXer for
>> the foreseeable future.
>
> This is where having built-in support for lyx2lyx w
On 09/17/2009 09:02 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Alex Fernandez writes:
Consequently, I think
we ought to be careful here to ensure consistency over time and over
changes in binary distributors. It's in general not a good thing to
provide a feature in earlier releases and fail to provide
Afief Halumi ha scritto:
One thing I do miss in Lyx though is the ability to take up my stylus
and draw whatever physical experiment is being explained and having
the drawing automatically appear in lyx. What I currently do whenever
Isn't it already possible to associate an external editor to
Hello everyone,
I've been using lyx to write my lecture notes for the last year and I
absolutely love it, I've gone from simple text+math to
text+math+floats+footnotes+++
One thing I do miss in Lyx though is the ability to take up my stylus
and draw whatever physical experiment is being expla
Alex Fernandez writes:
>> Can't you just put the full path to elyxer.py on the command line? So,
>> detect the elyxer.py location in the configure script and provide the full
>> path to python?
>
> That is a possibility, but it would break on other systems. For
> example on Mac OS X, where the use
Alex Fernandez writes:
>> Consequently, I think
>> we ought to be careful here to ensure consistency over time and over
>> changes in binary distributors. It's in general not a good thing to
>> provide a feature in earlier releases and fail to provide it in later
>> releases, and, impressed though
Alex Fernandez writes:
>> Why not:
>>
>> python -m module-name
>> Searches sys.path for the named module and runs the correspond‐
>> ing .py file as a script.
>>
>> ?
>>
>> and in the elyxer.py module:
>>
>> # Run main, if called from the command line::
>>
>> if __nam
