Re: two questions to be able to update the UserGuide

2009-08-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb: - When you open the manual Extended.lyx in branch you see that two different authors have modified the file using change tracking. From where can I get the information who made the changes? If you click on a change, the statusbar will say who the author is. Or,

Re: two questions to be able to update the UserGuide

2009-08-02 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef: - When you open the manual Extended.lyx in branch you see that two different authors have modified the file using change tracking. From where can I get the information who made the changes? If you click on a change, the statusbar will say who the author is. Or, you could op

Re: r30833 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

2009-08-02 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef: > No, this is me. Does this need to be fixed or is it by design? regards Uwe It does need to be fixed, but I'm thinking about how.. Vincent

Re: r30833 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

2009-08-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> No, this is me. Does this need to be fixed or is it by design? regards Uwe

two questions to be able to update the UserGuide

2009-08-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Today I updated the UserGuide and stumbled over the following two things: - In the File menu we have an entry named "Fax". It is below the entry "Print" but doesn't appear here on Windows. What is this entry for and what needs to be done that it appears? - When you open the manual Extended.lyx

Re: Going backward

2009-08-02 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto: So you are not going to switch to in memory search? My idea was to implement the searching functions in Inset::search(), Paragraph::search() and Text::search()... whereas your technique is to stringify or to latexify the contents before searching. Of course, the lo

Re: r30833 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

2009-08-02 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Pavel Sanda schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: uwesto...@lyx.org schreef: @@ -42518,7 +42630,8 @@ \end_inset dd -\begin_inset Formula $\approx$ +\begin_inset Formula $\approx +$ \end_inset 37.6 Why would that happen ? isn't this similar to the old bug trigge

Re: r30833 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

2009-08-02 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > uwesto...@lyx.org schreef: >> @@ -42518,7 +42630,8 @@ >> \end_inset >> dd -\begin_inset Formula $\approx$ >> +\begin_inset Formula $\approx >> +$ >> \end_inset >>37.6 >> > Why would that happen ? isn't this similar to the old bug triggered by spellcheck?

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 02/08/2009 18:52, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > > > On 02/08/2009 18:41, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > > By the way Kornel, we need an USE_HUNSPELL define similar to > > > > USE_ASPELL in cas

Re: r30833 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

2009-08-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> -Subparagraphs > +Subparagraph > +\family default > +s > > This looks very suspicious too. This is not due to a file format update, I changed this purposely to sync with branch. regards Uwe

Re: r30833 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

2009-08-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
>> -\begin_inset Formula $\approx$ >> +\begin_inset Formula $\approx >> +$ > > Why would that happen ? I thought that this is due to your patch for the labels in math bug. But anyway, could you please have a look if any other mathed changes in trunk this week eventually causes this? regards Uw

Re: r30833 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

2009-08-02 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: uwesto...@lyx.org schreef: @@ -42518,7 +42630,8 @@ \end_inset dd -\begin_inset Formula $\approx$ +\begin_inset Formula $\approx +$ \end_inset 37.6 Why would that happen ? Vincent @@ -4410,7 +4411,9 @@ \family default s are divided into \family sa

Re: r30833 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

2009-08-02 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
uwesto...@lyx.org schreef: @@ -42518,7 +42630,8 @@ \end_inset dd -\begin_inset Formula $\approx$ +\begin_inset Formula $\approx +$ \end_inset 37.6 Why would that happen ? Vincent

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 02/08/2009 18:52, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 02/08/2009 18:41, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > By the way Kornel, we need an USE_HUNSPELL define similar to > > USE_ASPELL in case the system supports hunspell, could you add that? I > > already did

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 02/08/2009 18:41, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > By the way Kornel, we need an USE_HUNSPELL define similar to > > USE_ASPELL in case the system supports hunspell, could you add that? I > > already did this for autotools AFAIR. > > I did it. B

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 02/08/2009 17:10, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > > > libhunspell.lib is I guess the name chosen by the hunspell developers, > > > if I rename that to huspell.lib, cmake won't error out! > > > S

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 02/08/2009 18:41, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: By the way Kornel, we need an USE_HUNSPELL define similar to USE_ASPELL in case the system supports hunspell, could you add that? I already did this for autotools AFAIR. I did it. Abdel.

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 02/08/2009 17:10, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > libhunspell.lib is I guess the name chosen by the hunspell developers, > if I rename that to huspell.lib, cmake won't error out! > So that's OK as far as I am concerned on Windows. Ok, I will change

Re: blocker for LyX 1.6.4

2009-08-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Uwe Stöhr schrieb: Since this week's fix for the language handling there is a regression in branch... I accidentally closed LyX. After restarting it I can no longer reproduce this - strange. So ignore this topic. regards Uwe

blocker for LyX 1.6.4

2009-08-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Since this week's fix for the language handling there is a regression in branch: - open an English and e.g. a French document - copy text from the French document to the English one Result: the language information is lost you you get LaTeX errors when compiling because the encoding is no longe

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 02/08/2009 12:44, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > > > On 02/08/2009 12:35, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > +if (HUNSPELL_FOUND) > > > > + target_link_libraries(${_lyx} hunspell) > > > > > > On Windo

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 02/08/2009 12:44, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 02/08/2009 12:35, Kornel Benko wrote: > > +if (HUNSPELL_FOUND) > > + target_link_libraries(${_lyx} hunspell) > > On Windows, I need libhunspell instead of hunspell and then it links! Try again :(

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 02/08/2009 12:35, Kornel Benko wrote: > > +if (HUNSPELL_FOUND) > > +target_link_libraries(${_lyx} hunspell) > > On Windows, I need libhunspell instead of hunspell and then it links! Try again :( > Abdel. Kornel signatur

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 02/08/2009 12:35, Kornel Benko wrote: +if (HUNSPELL_FOUND) +target_link_libraries(${_lyx} hunspell) On Windows, I need libhunspell instead of hunspell and then it links! Abdel.

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 02/08/2009 12:35, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 02/08/2009 11:25, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb you...@lyx.org: > > > * Begin Hunspell support (not tested and does not link yet) > > > > It links on linux > > Good, than

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 02/08/2009 11:25, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb you...@lyx.org: > > > * Begin Hunspell support (not tested and does not link yet) > > > > It links on linux > > Good, thanks for trying. But you did set TRY_HUNSPELL

Re: Going backward

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 02/08/2009 00:52, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto: Hello Tommaso, Hello, Coming back to FindAndAdvanced? ;-) in fact. Last time I left over with a usable forward (after the optimization in which I search first the outer pit, then, once found, I search exactly the pos

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 02/08/2009 11:25, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb you...@lyx.org: > * Begin Hunspell support (not tested and does not link yet) It links on linux Good, thanks for trying. But you did set TRY_HUNSPELL to 1 in HunspellChecker, right? _and_ seems to work! Well we

Re: r30824 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-08-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 02 August 2009 schrieb you...@lyx.org: > * Begin Hunspell support (not tested and does not link yet) It links on linux _and_ seems to work! Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Where to find the hunspell dictionnaries on Windows?

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 01/08/2009 20:32, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Samstag 01 August 2009 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > I cannot seem to find them in any of my Thunderbird, Firefox or > OpenOffice installation... > > Idea someone? Not for windows, but .. on ubuntu: firefox: /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.12/dictionaries -> /usr

Re: r30602 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets

2009-08-02 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 01/08/2009 23:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 01/08/2009 18:29, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : In case this question was left unanswered, we don't want a buffer_ member in InsetMathChar because this sucks 4 bytes of memory for each inset. And, AFAICS, there's no need to access the Buffer in a