Hi all,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>> the graphical tour, so for now I've place the new images in the
>> subdirectory
>> images/LGT/En
>>
>> If anyone (perhaps the original authors)
>
> original authors are not here anymore i guess
T
Dear lyx developers,
Attached is a "diff -u" patch fixing a small display bug in the AMS
article layout, where starred Section, Subsections, etc are not
displayed correctly. I fixed it by repeating the modification of
Sections.
The AMS book layout file seems to have a similar pr
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:12:18AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
Graphichs dialog:
The "maintain aspect ratio" checkbox has the tooltip text "Scale image
to maximum size not exceeding width and height"
This looks like misinformation to me. I never had the impression tha
Pavel Sanda schrieb:
* http://www.lyx.org/Web.VersioningSystem . . . May 28, 2009, at 08:28 PM by
Uwe StĂśhr
btw Uwe removing the sentence "For each major release, the source code is
forked off into a
separate stable branch" was not lucky step for better understanding of the text
imho.
I
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:12:18AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Graphichs dialog:
> The "maintain aspect ratio" checkbox has the tooltip text "Scale image
> to maximum size not exceeding width and height"
>
> This looks like misinformation to me. I never had the impression that
> this checkbox
Graphichs dialog:
The "maintain aspect ratio" checkbox has the tooltip text "Scale image
to maximum size not exceeding width and height"
This looks like misinformation to me. I never had the impression that
this checkbox maximized the size in any way. It maintains correct aspect
ratio, for ex
Helge Hafting schreef:
The color settings have several settings for math macros, that I don't
understand.
I have no idea what these two are, so I cannot translate:
math macro blended out
math macro hovered frame
These two I can translate, but it'd nice to know what "old" and "new"
parameters
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Enrico Forestieri writes:
And surely introduce many others. If the only problem is shipping an
html version of the man pages the most unintrusive and fool proof
way is using man2html.
The question is precisely to know whether we want to ship an html pag
