On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:40:28AM +0200, for...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: forenr
> Date: Tue Mar 31 00:40:27 2009
> New Revision: 28981
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28981
>
> Log:
> Partly revert r28731 (see discussion in bug 5836).
> Essentially, it is not true that Cyrillic characte
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
I need more information.
Try to import the attached one. This works with LyX 1.6.2 but not with 1.6.3svn
and 2.0svn.
Btw. where is the environment list "known_math_environments" stored?
There is only this line:
CommandMap known_math_environments;
But I want
Christian Ridderström schrieb:
Maybe it would be more constructive to discuss how we _would_ like
things like this dealt with?
The only important point I have is that more than one developer should know about our finances
(maybe only Lars and José, but more than one person). So just more tran
More important: Have you seen this post?:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg149440.html
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr writes:
> Since http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28858/ formulas can no longer
> be imported to LyX. The reason is that in math.cpp the routine
>
> bool is_math_env(string const & name)
> {
> return known_math_environments.find(name) !=
> known_math_environments.end();
> }
>
> n
Uwe Stöhr writes:
> More important: Have you seen this post?:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg149440.html
I almost forgot. Thanks for reminding me.
JMarc
Being outnumbered starts with having a wife...
And even sometimes with having a life.
JMarc
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
Now you will be outnumbered.
Being o
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 06:04:26PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 29 mars 09 à 23:02, rgheck a écrit :
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-devel!
>>> Maybe you should.
>>
>> Well, it will be the
Jean-Claude Garreau wrote:
Hi,
I tried many times to acces bugzilla, but I always got the message
"Bugzilla is currently broken. Please try again later. If the problem
persists, please contact mich...@lyx.org. The error you should quote is:
Access denied for user 'bugs'@'localho
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Christian Ridderström
wrote:
>>> Maybe a shared gmail account? (We might be violating some TOS if we do
>>> that)
>>>
>>> /Christian
>>
>> I've used http://www.esnips.com/, which allows 50MB compressed files
>> (up to a total of 5GB). Seems OK.
>
> Does it cost m
Hi,
I tried many times to acces bugzilla, but I always got the message
"Bugzilla is currently broken. Please try again later. If the problem
persists, please contact mich...@lyx.org. The error you should quote is:
Access denied for user 'bugs'@'localhost' (using password: YES) at
>>
>>> I'm looking at e.g.
>>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=status&USER=anonymous
>>>
>>> and I wonder if anyone else thinks it's a bit slow?
>>
>> We just have t many active bugs.. +- 1000 !?
>
>Didn't you say you were running out of bugs ;-)
>
>/C
>
Yes, I did.
Vincent
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Guenter Milde wrote:
and problems with migrating bugzilla. I also seem to understand that
However, when I go to www.lyx.org and click the "Bug Tracker" link in
the sidebar, I see::
Software error:
I thought I could set up a virtual host on the new server (lyx.lyx.or
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Christian Ridderström
wrote:
How large files are we talking about?
Are there any online services we could use?
Maybe a shared gmail account? (We might be violating some TOS if we do that)
/Christian
I've used
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
I'm looking at e.g.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=status&USER=anonymous
and I wonder if anyone else thinks it's a bit slow?
We just have t many active bugs.. +- 1000 !?
Didn't you say you were running out o
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
> Well, honestly, I don't think anybody doubted Lars' honesty. It was
> just a problem of lack of information.
>
OK, I see that what I wrote looked like that. So I apologize to people
w
Richard Heck wrote:
you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Mon Mar 30 09:44:01 2009
New Revision: 28977
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28977
Log:
gcc compile fix.
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/src/SpellChecker.h
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/SpellChecker.h
=
you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Mon Mar 30 09:44:01 2009
New Revision: 28977
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28977
Log:
gcc compile fix.
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/src/SpellChecker.h
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/SpellChecker.h
==
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:56, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
What is wrong with "defect"?
Nothing. I just didn't get the concept (I thought it means the entry is
defect). See my other mail.
As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbra
"Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW" writes:
> Well, I still want to adjust the context menu handling. Now, the cursor
> is automatically placed right in front of the inset, when right-clicking
> on the menu. Even, when you are inside the inset. In that case, I would
> like the cursor to remain at the p
On Sunday 29 March 2009 21:41:19 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Indeed.
>
> JMarc
+1
And congratulations to both Abdel and Jean-Marc BTW. :-)
--
José Abílio
>> And no "next-inset inset-toggle" construction after all ?
>
>I finally convinced myself it was easier. In particular, we know
>that we can invoke Inset::dispatch directly without running into
>an assertion.
>I like this solution, but if a better idea emerges, I can revert.
Well, I still wan
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
Well, honestly, I don't think anybody doubted Lars' honesty. It was
just a problem of lack of information.
OK, I see that what I wrote looked like that. So I apologize to people
who think I misrepresented their thoughts. Neverthele
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
> Well, honestly, I don't think anybody doubted Lars' honesty. It was
> just a problem of lack of information.
OK, I see that what I wrote looked like that. So I apologize to people
who think I misrepresented their thoughts. Nevertheless, I really think
that meeting face
"Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW" writes:
> Would this mean the end of LFUN_NEXT_INSET_MODIFY too ?
Yes, but for this one I have to handle undo too. I wonder whether I
shall put that in the general handling or add a recordUndo call for each
individual INSET_MODIFY call.
> And no "next-inset inset-t
>Author: lasgouttes
>Date: Mon Mar 30 15:49:52 2009
>New Revision: 28980
>URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28980
>
>Log:
>Kill next-inset-toggle and expand inset-toggle to provide
>the same functionality
Would this mean the end of LFUN_NEXT_INSET_MODIFY too ?
And no "next-inset inset-to
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Christian Ridderström
wrote:
> How large files are we talking about?
>
> Are there any online services we could use?
>
> Maybe a shared gmail account? (We might be violating some TOS if we do that)
>
> /Christian
I've used http://www.esnips.com/, which allows 50M
Dear developers,
as I skim the lyx-devel list, I know that there is a server migration and
problems with migrating bugzilla. I also seem to understand that there is
no final decision on whether to re-establish bugzilla.lyx.org or to move
to trac.
However, when I go to www.lyx.org and click the "
>I'm looking at e.g.
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=status&USER=anonymous
>
>and I wonder if anyone else thinks it's a bit slow?
We just have t many active bugs.. +- 1000 !?
>Or perhaps even more constructive, to discuss when/where the
>next LyX meeting should be held?
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Christian Ridderström writes:
It's our (collective) fault in Berlin for not taking more care with
the financial aspects, but that is probably what happens when you are
used to relying on Lars' to take care of this.
What I remember from Berlin was that it wa
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
I'm looking at e.g.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=status&USER=anonymous
and I wonder if anyone else thinks it's a bit slow?
For instance, clicking on
Christian Ridderström writes:
> It's our (collective) fault in Berlin for not taking more care with
> the financial aspects, but that is probably what happens when you are
> used to relying on Lars' to take care of this.
What I remember from Berlin was that it was a bit like if there were two
cam
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:53, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
> > I think this issue is fixed now also the keyword issue, so in 30
> mins (or so), please check again.
>
> Things look pretty good now.. I can't think of any problems right now.
>
> I'm curious
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
Because you have not volunteered to do any work... I think I got exactly
zero response about my request for some help with bugzilla.
I missed that. What can I do to help you? When you can give me the
existing bugzilla data
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Some other way of providing files like that must be provided. (Or perhaps
just the regular way: ftp)
But this means people will need some kind of accounts, right?
I assume it doesn't have to be ftp.lyx.org?
This is indeed a feature we need.
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Andre Poenitz wrote:
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs for
our last developer meeting on our own but the general LyX donations
are exactly for that purpose in my opinion. Moreover are the people
who sponsor us still not listed at our webpage w
> I think this issue is fixed now also the keyword issue, so in 30 mins (or
> so), please check again.
Things look pretty good now.. I can't think of any problems right now.
I'm curious what personalization features trac offers when I can login.
And I didn't find a way how to enter a ne
Hello,
Just wanted to let you know that LyX, CMake and QtCreator are a perfect
match!
André, I guess you can remove the qmake files now from trunk now ;-)
Abdel.
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> I remember having seen a (critical) bug a while ago which occurred when
> both a label as nonumber was specified.
>
> I can't remember more details, and can't look for the specific bug right
> now.
This?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5688
Jürgen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> now also the keyword issue, so in 30 mins (or
> so), please check again.
Looks like it, yes.
(though I haven't checked the quantity)
Thanks,
Jürgen
>Actually, \label{foo} does not mean "number this line and give
>it name foo" but "the next numbered line will be associated to
>label foo". This works fine because the number is already known
>when beginning the equation.
I remember having seen a (critical) bug a while ago which occurred when
Vincent van Ravesteijn writes:
> Yes, but Richard is still living in the branch-world, and I did not
> ask for or get an ok from Juergen yet..
Good point.
JMarc
2009/3/30 Lars Gullik Bjønnes
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
> v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
>
>> > You could have tried yourself you know...
>>
>> Well, I couldn't find another bug with attachments very quickly and I had
>> to do something else.
>>
>>
Uwe Stöhr writes:
> Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
>
>> > When I try a File|Import|Latex (plain) with the simple file
>> >
>> > \documentclass{article}
>> > \begin{document}
>> > \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:scalinglnlambda}
>> > A & = & B \nonumber \\
>> > & = & C\end{eqnarray}
>> > \end{document}
>>
>>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
> > You could have tried yourself you know...
>
> Well, I couldn't find another bug with attachments very quickly and I had
> to do something else.
>
> > My guess it is a size issue, and I am only
> You could have tried yourself you know...
Well, I couldn't find another bug with attachments very quickly and I had to do
something else.
> My guess it is a size issue, and I am only guessing since you give no info
> about what you tried to do.
What I tried to do.. ? Uhh.. Download th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I contacted the ftp maintainers to have this fixed.
Thanks again.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Thanks, it's on the server.
>
> Well, it least I uploaded it. It's not yet visible on
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.2
I contacted the ftp maintainers to have this fixed.
JMarc
Hi,
Just to let you know that I have some uncommitted patches related to
spellchecker that I didn't have the time to clean up yet. So don't be
surprised if things are a bit unstable functionality wise. Considering
the current state of the spellchecker dialog in branch, it cannot be
worse anyw
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:30, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> This is just a textual representation of the change in bugzilla.
>> But I think I might fix this without too much effort.
>>
>> Are there other showstoppers?
>>
>
> The attachment of bug 52
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is just a textual representation of the change in bugzilla.
> But I think I might fix this without too much effort.
Also for the other keywords?
> Are there other showstoppers?
None that I'm aware of. However, I'm eager to see the possibilities we have
when we
This is just a textual representation of the change in bugzilla.
But I think I might fix this without too much effort.
Are there other showstoppers?
The attachment of bug 5238 can't be retrieved...
How about the other attachments..?
Vinc
> >I see 42 tickets that match on "fixedinbranch" and 206 that matches
> >"fixedintrunk", IMHO not out of the question to do this manually.
> >
>
> But in the bugs themselves trac says:
>
> "keywords fixedinbranch added"
>
> They just don't show up in the column view or in search queries..
>
This
rgheck writes:
>> Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
>> hearing the same news ;)
>>
> Now you will be outnumbered.
I did not say we are only two! (ok, you win: we are)
JMarc
> > As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbranch, that is something we made up,
> > noone else uses bugzilla that way (afaics)
>
> But trac also has keywords. What stops us from simply migrating this data?
>
> So is this a showstopper?
>
>> IMHO yes. And we need to restore this in any case. Our current re
Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
> As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbranch, that is something we made up, noone else
> uses bugzilla that way (afaics)
I can believe that. But we can do it nevertheless, can't we? Or can we
set it as fixed in some milestone and have the bug appears as long as
the milestone is
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:56, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > What is wrong with "defect"?
>
> Nothing. I just didn't get the concept (I thought it means the entry is
> defect). See my other mail.
>
> > As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbranch, that is something we made up, n
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What is wrong with "defect"?
Nothing. I just didn't get the concept (I thought it means the entry is
defect). See my other mail.
> As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbranch, that is something we made up, noone else
> uses bugzilla that way (afaics)
But trac also has keyword
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:32, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I guess you noticed the large number of "defect" Type entries.
>
> OK, I see now that this seems to be intentional. Trac distinguishes ticket
> type ("enhancements" and "defects") from Severity. Having the Se
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:17, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
>
> I guess you noticed the large number of "defect" Type entries. Furthermore,
> the "fixedinbranch" and "fixedintrunk" keywords seems
uwesto...@lyx.org writes:
> Log:
> math.cpp: fix a typo
> - // we are inside some text mode thingy, so
> opening new math is allowed
> + // we are inside some text mode thing, so
> opening new math is allowed
I do not think it was a typo,
62 matches
Mail list logo
