Re: Keyboard Shortcuts (fwd)

2009-03-12 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote: does it help when your remove your ~/.lyx directory ? LyX opens to the introductory document. When I open one of mine, the [Del] key works as it should. I'm attaching my bind file (modified from the emacs.bind);

Re: [PATCH] Bug 5850

2009-03-12 Thread rgheck
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: rgheck schreef: I'd rather not just restore the setBuffer calls, since doing so means going through the entire document and setting every single inset's buffer_ member every time we call updateLabels(), which just seems excessive. So I instead propose the attach

Re: About: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28754

2009-03-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 12/03/2009 20:31, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Abdel, I would like to attent you to this commit (as the cvslog rip): http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28754 Looks sensible. I confess that I did not test all use cases when I tried to clean up that code. So if it

Re: About: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28754

2009-03-12 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 12/03/2009 20:31, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Abdel, I would like to attent you to this commit (as the cvslog rip): http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28754 Looks sensible. I confess that I did not test all use cases when I tried to clean up that code. So if it works as expected and you s

About: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28754

2009-03-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Abdel, I would like to attent you to this commit (as the cvslog rip): http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28754 Vincent

Re: [PATCH] Bug 5850

2009-03-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
rgheck schreef: I'd rather not just restore the setBuffer calls, since doing so means going through the entire document and setting every single inset's buffer_ member every time we call updateLabels(), which just seems excessive. So I instead propose the attached. Hmm.. it still feels like

Re: testing 1.6.2-svn

2009-03-12 Thread rgheck
* Dissolving a branch inset in the child works. Restoring via Ctrl-Z leads to a *crash*: The LyX window dissapears and the console shows the output: The cause of this crash is similar. It's another updateLabels/updateMacros problem. I've got a fix for it in trunk, but not yet in br

Re: testing 1.6.2-svn

2009-03-12 Thread rgheck
Guenter Milde wrote: * Testing the parent/child setup: + a branch set up in the child is not listed in Insert>Branches> Please bugzilla that one. + a branch set up in the parent is listed in Insert>Branches>, but even if set to "aktive" its content is hidden in the output if only t

[PATCH] Bug 5850

2009-03-12 Thread rgheck
I'd rather not just restore the setBuffer calls, since doing so means going through the entire document and setting every single inset's buffer_ member every time we call updateLabels(), which just seems excessive. So I instead propose the attached. The action here is in the addition of anoth

testing 1.6.2-svn

2009-03-12 Thread Guenter Milde
I switched my working copy to the 1_6_x branch in order to test the 1.6.2-rc. * make complained about a missing client/lyxclient.man file (I could restore it from 1.6.1's lyxclient.1.gz). * Testing the parent/child setup: + a branch set up in the child is not listed in Insert>Branches>

Re: Test

2009-03-12 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes writes: If the above email is younes at lyx dot org then yes, I used to have a forward to younes.a at free dot fr there. Yes it is this mail. However, mail at lyx.org is now handled by gmail and lars has asked you for a login/password pair. I di

Re: Test

2009-03-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Abdelrazak Younes writes: > If the above email is younes at lyx dot org then yes, I used to have a > forward to younes.a at free dot fr there. Yes it is this mail. However, mail at lyx.org is now handled by gmail and lars has asked you for a login/password pair. With that, you should log in at ht

Re: Test

2009-03-12 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes writes: Doesn't seem work for me. I haven't received anything for two days. Do I have to subscribe again? Are you subscribed as you...@lyx.org? Did you set up a forward there? If the above email is younes at lyx dot org then yes, I used to have

Re: Test

2009-03-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Abdelrazak Younes writes: > Doesn't seem work for me. I haven't received anything for two days. > Do I have to subscribe again? Are you subscribed as you...@lyx.org? Did you set up a forward there? JMarc

Re: Test

2009-03-12 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
rgheck wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Kornel Benko schreef: Test only Kornel Another test especially for Kornel. Those both made it to me, so things seem to be working. Doesn't seem work for me. I haven't received anything for two days. Do I have to subscribe again? Abdel.