sanda wrote:
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28044
> Log:
> Backport 5648
OK.
After 1.6 I retried to integrate the BPCHEM package and it worked fine. I made
custom insets for the BPChem and the IUPAC command of that package, which
allow the easy typesetting of sum-formulas and long IUPAC names.
How can I install a button / keyboard shortcut to write the insets to avoid th
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:58 PM, wrote:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5648
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From p...@twin.jikos.cz 2009-01-09 01:58 ---
> Bo?
The fix is trivial. Pavel, could you please submit the attached patch
to branch and trunk. (I do not have trunk here.)
Stefan Schimanski writes:
>> I think that \global\newcommand works in any case.
>
> It does? I think I tried and it did not.
I might be wrong. I cannot find reference to that right now.
> A second requirement: the distinction between \newcommand and
> \renewcommand is very fragile. It is far fro
Richard Heck wrote:
>
> The attached file produces a crash due to an uninitialized Inset::buffer_
> in math:
was this finally put into the bugzilla?
pavel
> #0 0x003c41430ec5 in raise (sig=) at
> ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64
> #1 0x003c41432970 in abort () at abort.c:88
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> trunk:
> - adds the LyXAction "regexp-mode", which is used by the search advanced
> dialog when choosing one of the available options);
> - also, the regexp-mode may be entered by typing C-S-r, that's why cua.bind
> is affected as well.
is it possible to insert this in
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a mail forwarded (and slightly edited by me) from the User's list
> of Dieter Jurzitza. I posed two questions in the mail below.
>
> Vincent
>
>
> Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
> > Dear listmembers,
> >
> > ... what I would like to see are [four] litt
b...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: baum
> Date: Tue Dec 23 18:25:11 2008
> New Revision: 27971
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/27971
> Log:
> make Pavel happy
:) thanks
pavel
Am 07.01.2009 um 22:45 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
xargs is only needed if you have macros with optional arguments. Of
course, \newcommand could handle the case with one optional. But,
what we need in fact is something equivalent to \global\def for
this case. Is there a way to do this wi
Am 07.01.2009 um 22:45 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
xargs is only needed if you have macros with optional arguments. Of
course, \newcommand could handle the case with one optional. But,
what we need in fact is something equivalent to \global\def for
this case. Is there a way to do this wi
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-01-05, leuven edwin wrote:
richard wrote:
The unicodesymbols file lists things like this: \"{o} and not like this: \"o
So G\"odel doesn't get translated.
isn't it possible to have multiple entries in the unicodesymbols file?
Mind, that th
On 2009-01-05, leuven edwin wrote:
> richard wrote:
>> The unicodesymbols file lists things like this: \"{o} and not like this: \"o
>> So G\"odel doesn't get translated.
> isn't it possible to have multiple entries in the unicodesymbols file?
Mind, that the primary use of the unicodesymbols file
Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
About your patch, I think we have too choices:
1) You split up your patch in smaller patches so that we can apply
them on per fix or per feature iteration.
2) You manage to get svn access so that you can commit the
uncontroversal parts of your patch yourself.
Howev
13 matches
Mail list logo
