Re: Document dialog

2008-10-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
José Matos wrote: > On Friday 17 October 2008 09:20:21 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > +1 > > +1 > > > Jürgen > > -- > José Abílio i changed it. anyway theres one thing missing. two module names are quite long (ie "Theorems (Order By Section)") which makes the module panel still uggly. there are

Re: r26944 - /lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource...

2008-10-18 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 18/10/2008 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: spitz Date: Sat Oct 18 15:51:48 2008 New Revision: 26944 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26944 Log: compile fix 2 Sorry. Abdel.

Re: [patch] fix bug 5376 (AMS dots)

2008-10-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > I prefer the attached. It lets you specify the requirement in symbols, > > which is > >  > more flexible. > > Me too. I apply it then. Jürgen

Re: [patch] fix bug 5376 (AMS dots)

2008-10-18 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> I prefer the attached. It lets you specify the requirement in symbols, which is > more flexible. Me too. regards Uwe

Re: [patch] fix bug 5376 (AMS dots)

2008-10-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > The attached patch fixes > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5376 > for me. > As I'm not 100% sure about the code, could some math expert please have a > look at the patch and give is OK or correct it? I prefer the attached. It lets you specify the rquirement in symbols, w

[patch] fix bug 5376 (AMS dots)

2008-10-18 Thread Uwe Stöhr
The attached patch fixes http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5376 for me. As I'm not 100% sure about the code, could some math expert please have a look at the patch and give is OK or correct it? thanks and regards Uwe Index: mathed/InsetMathDots.cpp

Re: [patch] Re: status of linuxodc

2008-10-18 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Uwe Stöhr schrieb: Here is the patch that removes the last traces of linuxdoc. Please ignore that one, attached is the correct one. regards Uwe Index: configure.py === --- configure.py (revision 26935) +++ configure.py (working c

[patch] Re: status of linuxodc

2008-10-18 Thread Uwe Stöhr
>> I was under the impression that linuxdoc support got removed, but it is >> still present in configure.py. What is the status? > > It was removed but it seems that we forgot that bit. :-) Here is the patch that removes the last traces of linuxdoc. OK to go in? regards Uwe Index: configure.py

resetting itemize to standard

2008-10-18 Thread leuven edwin
when i reset the last line in the attached document (which is a nested item) to standard, the paragraph is still part of the itemizing environment. someone at work who was not aware of this behavior did something similar and reset a nested item to an endframe and ended up with a document that di