Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > I tried out the new linguistics module and see there that
> > \usepackage{covinton}
> > appears every time in the preamble when the mudule is used in the
> > document.
We need a requires tag.
I've looked into this a bit, and what's happening is that the preamble
informa
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22410
> Log:
> Embedding: After another round of EmbeddedFiles changes, embedded figures
> should more or less work now.
Expect bugs, but you may want to play with the embedding feature
(InsetGraphics only) now, by
Enable, disable embedding
Change embeddi
Pavel Sanda wrote:
order, too. Are there opinions on how that should be done---viz.,
alphabetically, thematically, ???
i would vote for thematical (re)grouping
i also wonder whats the meaning of number-counting of the lfuns.
does anybody use it or can it be deleted too ?
The only use
Per Olofsson wrote:
> Well, I submitted the patch over a year ago:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8158
I'll (help) take care of it, looks nice, btw. :)
-- Rex
Per Olofsson wrote:
> rgheck wrote:
>> Per Olofsson wrote:
>>> There is no mention of mimeopen in copy of xdg-open. Could it be another
>>> distro-specific patch?
>>>
>>>
>> Sounds like it.
>
> Seems like a good patch, I should add it to the Debian package. Which
> distribution are you running
Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Yes, but the point is that by using xdg-open, we use whatever the user
>> has set as default, rather than (say) using acroread when they've set
>> kpdf. The
>
> afaik the problem is that there is no unified system how to handle file
> types in linux. xdg-open is just script
>> no, the output is verbatim. maybe i will change this case to eg
>> [].
>>
>>
> I beat you to it!!
you want to eat all the commit joy for this day, dont you :D
p
christian . ridderstrom
Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:41:11 -0800
Hi,
I just read about a software called 'Scrivener' in NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06wwln-medium-t.html?ref=technology
The writer seems very pleased with it, here's the Scrivener page for
Mac:
http:/
> order, too. Are there opinions on how that should be done---viz.,
> alphabetically, thematically, ???
i would vote for thematical (re)grouping
i also wonder whats the meaning of number-counting of the lfuns.
does anybody use it or can it be deleted too ?
pavel
> drawer on Mac). That is, I'd like to be able to manipulate document
> headings (Part/Chapter/Section/Subsection/...) with the keyboard in the
> same way we now can manipulate levels of enumerate environments. Thus (on
> Mac), should demote a document heading from Chapter
> to Section, just a
The LFUNs in lfun.h are, from what I can tell, in no particular order.
Now that we're doxyfying them, it seems as if some sensible order would
be worth having, so that the generated documentation would have a
sensible order, too. Are there opinions on how that should be
done---viz., alphabeti
no, the output is verbatim. maybe i will change this case to eg [].
I beat you to it!!
rh
On Jan 6, 2008, at 11:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just read about a software called 'Scrivener' in NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06wwln-medium-t.html?
ref=technology
The writer seems very pleased with it, here's the Scrivener page
for Mac:
http:/
>>> - * \li Syntax: lfun_paragraph-params [INDENT] [SPACING] [ALIGN] [OTHERS]
>>> - * \li Params: INDENT: \\noindent|\\indent|\\indent-toggle|\\leftindent
>>> LENGTH\n
>>> - SPACING: \\paragraph_spacing
>>> default|single|onehalf|double|other\n
>>> - ALIGN: \\align block
Peter Kümmel wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:04:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
-bool BufferParams::addLayoutModule(string modName, bool makeClass) {
+bool BufferParams::addLayoutModule(string modName) {
[..]
bool BufferParams::addLayoutModule
rgheck wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:04:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
-bool BufferParams::addLayoutModule(string modName, bool makeClass) {
+bool BufferParams::addLayoutModule(string modName) {
[..]
bool BufferParams::addLayoutModules(vectormodNames)
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:04:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
-bool BufferParams::addLayoutModule(string modName, bool makeClass) {
+bool BufferParams::addLayoutModule(string modName) {
[..]
bool BufferParams::addLayoutModules(vectormodNames)
Grrr...
H
Per Olofsson wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Per Olofsson wrote:
There is no mention of mimeopen in copy of xdg-open. Could it be another
distro-specific patch?
Sounds like it.
Seems like a good patch, I should add it to the Debian package. Which
distribution are you running?
Per Olofsson wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:36:50PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
If it's really too much pain to fix xdg-open then I've to agree that it
would make more sense to revert the change.
have you some experience how much are xdg devs communicativ
rgheck wrote:
> Per Olofsson wrote:
>> There is no mention of mimeopen in copy of xdg-open. Could it be another
>> distro-specific patch?
>>
>>
> Sounds like it.
Seems like a good patch, I should add it to the Debian package. Which
distribution are you running?
>
>> mimeopen seems like the pr
Backtrace:
gdb /cvs/lyx-devel/trunk/src/lyx --interpreter=mi2 -quiet(gdb) quitquit
The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not
from terminal]
(gdb) Process exited
gdb /cvs/lyx-devel/trunk/src/lyx --interpreter=mi2 -quiet(gdb) quitquit
The program is running. Exit anyw
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Richard, could you please also update the LaTeXConfig.lyx file
accordingly to list endnotes there too.
As you saw in your bug report, no can do right now!
rh
Per Olofsson wrote:
rgheck wrote:
We've been using xdg-open as the first choice for the Debian packages and
subsequently the Ubuntu packages for over a year now and didn't
receive such
a problem report so I suspect that it makes more sense to fix the broken
setup instead of reverting this cha
Michael Gerz wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22386 - rgheck - Minor
modification: do not worry about .sty extension.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22388 - rgheck - Rationalize the
handling of makeTextClass().
Module related and so only for 1.6.
rh
Angus Leeming wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: rgheck
> Date: Sat Jan 5 17:49:49 2008
> New Revision: 22385
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22385
> Log:
> Implement isAvaiable in ModuleList.
Call be blind, but I cannot see where you set LyXModule::checked to
True...
Uhh,
Hi,
I just read about a software called 'Scrivener' in NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06wwln-medium-t.html?ref=technology
The writer seems very pleased with it, here's the Scrivener page for Mac:
http://literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.html
This page has
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Fri Dec 28 18:57:43 2007
New Revision: 22329
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22329
Log:
Contributions to the LFUN documentation project.
thanks for this.
+/**
+ * LFUN_BUFFER_NEW
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I tried out the new linguistics module and see there that
\usepackage{covinton}
appears every time in the preamble when the mudule is used in the
document.
We need a requires tag.
Can you explain exactly what you want here?
I'm confuse
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> %%% For document classes, things are even simpler, since you do not
> %%% need to edit this file. Just put your layout file in some place
> %%% where LyX can find it and add if you wish a description in
> %%% LaTeXConfig.lyx.in, as described above.
From where is this comment?
>
> Hmmm... I don't think it is a good idea mixing C and C++ I/O functions,
> or even using stdout for error messages. Can't lyxerr be used here?
The code was written in c. I replace makedir with our version because
I found a bug in the c implementation. I am not sure if I want to
modify the code
On Jan 5, 2008 10:55 PM, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: bpeng
> > Date: Sat Jan 5 05:43:13 2008
> > New Revision: 22374
> >
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22374
> > Log:
> > Embedding: does not write inzipName option in InsetGraphics bec
> intrusive this change required quite some thinking and testing. I am happy
> with the results now and I would like to invite you all to do some testing.
both two sample doc i have prepared for scroll testing failed.
one example is here:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/attachment.cgi?id=2218&action=vi
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> But does it matter?
Yes. Why do I need to install covington if I do not use it. Besides this, it's
a hack, and we need a clean solution.
Jürgen
> This doesn't look right. Covington is not needed by all elements of the
> module.
But does it matter? I think it doesn't harm to load covington in the preamble when the linguistics
module is used as you state explicitely in the documentation that covington is needed and the module
handler che
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > I tried out the new linguistics module and see there that
> > \usepackage{covinton}
> > appears every time in the preamble when the mudule is used in the
> > document.
We need a requires tag.
> > Packages loaded by modules should only appear once in the
> > preamble, no matte
Hi Jürgen,
here comes the latest (and possibly last) patch candidate list.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/20916 - leuven - add "copy to
clipboard" button to log dialog
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22005 - younes - New file is
placed in current directory by default. (Abdel: back
36 matches
Mail list logo
