Re: Incorrect (?) aclocal Warning

Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > WARNING: `aclocal-1.9' is missing on your system. > > That's true. > But I do have aclocal-1.10: > > :~ Roger$aclocal --version > aclocal (GNU automake) 1.10 > Written by Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >and Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK. Then the thing to do, I guess, is to add a check for each package > one of our modules needs, and then I'll add the relevant code to pop > up a warning whenever you try to use one that requires an unavailable > package. As exams are just about over, I

Multiple optional parameters for math macros in exports

Hi! I have nearly implemented all of my planned changes to the math macros. A major one is proper support for multiple arguments in TeX output. Until now they are supported by the LyX gui, but during export multiple optionals are "resolved", i.e. expanded in the TeX output. This means tha

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Yes, with an explanation that it is useful for the linguistics module. > It may be put in a different section. I think I will add a section "packages needed by modules" and add a subsection "Linguistics". OK? Jürgen

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

Richard Heck wrote: >> And further: what can I do if only a few of the elements require a given >> package? >> >> > Nothing directly, so far as I can see. Hm. How about a "requires" tag? Jürgen

Incorrect (?) aclocal Warning

I noticed while doing a make of svn revision 22213 that make produced: WARNING: `aclocal-1.9' is missing on your system. That's true. But I do have aclocal-1.10: :~ Roger$aclocal --version aclocal (GNU automake) 1.10 Written by Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EM

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: rgheck wrote: OK, good. Is there a simple mechanism for getting new things checked by chkconfig? Or is that the hard part? I'd guess we should at least check for the packages needed by our own modules. This is easy. It's described in chkconfig.ltx: %%% If

Re: [Bug 4147] Multiple cells paste as one in tables

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Interesting. This is the method that fails: > > case LFUN_PASTE: > if (tabularStackDirty() && theClipboard().isInternal()) { > recordUndoInset(cur, Undo::INSERT); > pasteClipboard(cur); > break; > } > cell(cur.idx())->dispatch(cur, cmd); > break; > > Maybe theClipboar

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

rgheck wrote: > OK, good. Is there a simple mechanism for getting new things checked by > chkconfig? Or is that the hard part? I'd guess we should at least check > for the packages needed by our own modules. This is easy. It's described in chkconfig.ltx: %%% If you want to add new packages/docum

Re: trunk doesn't load the user manual

> Just remove this assert, it is not useful and is bogus in the context of > EmbeddedFile support. Why? Even embededFile needs absolute path here (I guess.) Bo

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> None, despite that I miss the entry for covington in LaTeXConfig.lyx and >> the check for it in chkconfig.ltx. > > What is the policy? Do we need this for the modules? Yes, with an explanation that it is useful for the lingu

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: rgheck wrote: I agree that this would be nice, but at present there is no mechanism for checking whether the packages a given module needs are actually installed. I would suppose that this could be done by adapting chkconfig.ltx, but I'm useless when it comes to t

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.5.3 is released

Bennett Helm wrote: > Could you put all three of these on the server? Done. Thanks. Jürgen

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

rgheck wrote: > I agree that this would be nice, but at present there is no mechanism > for checking whether the packages a given module needs are actually > installed. I would suppose that this could be done by adapting > chkconfig.ltx, but I'm useless when it comes to that kind of LaTeX > progra

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.5.3 is released

Daniel Lohmann wrote: > Thank you! Thank you. The feedback is appreciated. Jürgen

Re: Hebrew on Mac OS X

(I'm moving this over to lyx-devel from lyx-users.) On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Abdel wrote: Quoting Alexander Maryanovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 12/19/07, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexander Maryanovsky wrote: On a related note, don't you guys think that an applicatio

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.5.3 is released

On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:22 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Bennett Helm wrote: I've posted the Mac-Intel binary here: Could you place them in the appropriate place on the server? (I'll follow up with Mac-PPC and Mac-Universal binari

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.5.3 is released

Hey LyX team, Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Did I say thank you? The new release is wonderful! There are *lots* of good new things; I especially love the new default display of character styles :-) Daniel

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Uwe Stöhr wrote: When the users don't have corvington installed, the covington module shouldn't be available, therefore we need to check this. configure.py does this by accessing chkconfig.ltx and writes the result to LaTeXConfig.lyx. For MiKTeX, the covington pac

Problems in InsetGraphics linked to Embedded file support (was Re: trunk doesn't load the user manual)

Stefan Schimanski wrote: The paths are still absolute in \includegraphics. I have a path for the lyx file with a dot: ~/Arbeit/thesis.lyx. The . shows up as \lyxdot in the \includegraphics output. But \lyxdot is not defined. Shouldn't those paths be relative? I believe you are right yes. T

Re: trunk doesn't load the user manual

Am 18.12.2007 um 11:35 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Stefan Schimanski wrote: Am 18.12.2007 um 11:00 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Stefan Schimanski wrote: ... because the following BOOST_ASSERT is not satisfied: void FileName::set(string const & name) { d->fi.setFile(toqstr(name)); BOOST_ASSE

Re: scrolling in lyx-1.6.dev

Ah, great! Very good to hear! -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > When the users don't have corvington installed, the covington module > shouldn't be available, therefore we need to check this. configure.py does > this by accessing chkconfig.ltx and writes the result to LaTeXConfig.lyx. > For MiKTeX, the covington package will automatically be

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

> When the users don't have corvington installed, the covington module > shouldn't be available, therefore we need to check this. configure.py does does 'not available' mean that it won't be enabled or that ot won't visible at all? pavel

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

> What is the policy? Do we need this for the modules? When the users don't have corvington installed, the covington module shouldn't be available, therefore we need to check this. configure.py does this by accessing chkconfig.ltx and writes the result to LaTeXConfig.lyx. For MiKTeX, the covin

Re: scrolling in lyx-1.6.dev

sebastian guttenberg wrote: Hi all I have permanent problems with scrolling in lyx.1.6dev. This affects both, mouse scrolling and keyboard scrolling. Sometimes it happened to me that I was scrolling permanently downwards and was meeting the same section twice! I cannot reproduce this behaviour at

Re: [patch] add shortcut for numbered formulas

Uwe Stöhr wrote: It was often requested by the users to have easy access for numbered formulas. (http://wiki.lyx.org/Tips.EquationNumbering) Therefore we added a menu entry for this in LyX 1.5. What is still missing is a shortcut. The attached patch adds this. OK? i would find a toggle number

scrolling in lyx-1.6.dev

Hi all I have permanent problems with scrolling in lyx.1.6dev. This affects both, mouse scrolling and keyboard scrolling. Sometimes it happened to me that I was scrolling permanently downwards and was meeting the same section twice! I cannot reproduce this behaviour at the moment (perhaps it is alr

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

rgheck wrote: > I didn't test it, but this looks great. This is exactly the kind of > thing for which modules are useful. Yes. modules very much pay off here. Jürgen

Re: [patch] Linguistics module

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > None, despite that I miss the entry for covington in LaTeXConfig.lyx and > the check for it in chkconfig.ltx. What is the policy? Do we need this for the modules? Jürgen

Re: [patch] add shortcut for numbered formulas

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > It was often requested by the users to have easy access for numbered > formulas. (http://wiki.lyx.org/Tips.EquationNumbering) > Therefore we added a menu entry for this in LyX 1.5. What is still missing > is a shortcut. The attached patch adds this. OK? Fine with me. Jürgen