Hi, Lars,
The following patch is needed to prevent lib/configure.py from hanging
when the latex test fails (latex will wait for user interaction). It
is in the trunk now, OK for 1.4.x?
Bo
Index: lib/configure.py
===
--- lib/configu
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > All source files (not headers) should include config.h as their first
| > include.
| >
| > For the boost source itself we set BOOST_USER_CONFIG to
| >
| > Or is this not reall what you are asking?
|
| It is.
|
| What I was saying is that this problem wi
All source files (not headers) should include config.h as their first
include.
For the boost source itself we set BOOST_USER_CONFIG to
Or is this not reall what you are asking?
It is.
What I was saying is that this problem will only show up in msvc so it
would be easier to find out if it tri
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > This might be caused by the use of boost headers without config.h,
| > since we only have that BOOST_ALL_NO_LIB defined in this header file.
| > Could you please check this for me?
|
| By greping debug/common/frontends/qt4/*.obj, I find that
| Application
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > It seems to be a severe problem for windows users, so I'd say they should be
| > used as soon as possible.
|
| I can confirm that with the latest patch (r14285) that convert all \t
| to spaces, bibtex works under windows.
|
| Lars, are you interested in
It seems to be a severe problem for windows users, so I'd say they should be
used as soon as possible.
I can confirm that with the latest patch (r14285) that convert all \t
to spaces, bibtex works under windows.
Lars, are you interested in merging 14285, 272, 270, 265, 261, 250,
238, 223 (conve
This might be caused by the use of boost headers without config.h,
since we only have that BOOST_ALL_NO_LIB defined in this header file.
Could you please check this for me?
By greping debug/common/frontends/qt4/*.obj, I find that
Application.obj has symbol vc80-mt-ss- Adding config.h to
Appl
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Now that you reached that point you might as well consider letting those
| people decide what's being done that actually do any coding. At least if
| there are clear majorities and your only argument is 'I don't like it'.
Not quite true tough... is it?
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 03:11:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > No, but I would expect Qt4 to behave the same way on different
| > platforms.
|
| There are completely different paint 'engines' (i.e. back ends) used on
| X11 and Win. And yes, it
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Abdelrazak> 4.1.0 will do fine yes but for speed I would recommend the
| > Abdelrazak> latest.
| >
| > So there is currently _no_ linux distribution that has a qt4 really
| > good enough for LyX?
|
| The point is that there is currently no distributi
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The booktabs support is fully functional now (except gtk frontend). One
| feature is missing: Suport for left and right adjustment of \clines.
|
| Since I don't know when I will be able to implement that, and since I want
| the current booktabs support i
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:19:23AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > I won't mind xforms going away - with its not antialiased text,
> | > cumbersome menus, and inability to use unicode.
> | > But I hope qt3 will stay around until qt4 catches
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 03:11:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No, but I would expect Qt4 to behave the same way on different
> platforms.
There are completely different paint 'engines' (i.e. back ends) used on
X11 and Win. And yes, it makes a huge difference .
Andre'
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:12:03AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You have ceased to be constructive a long long time ago.
As in 'You have ceased to have the same opinions as I'?
Or as in 'You have nowadays even stranger ideas on how to stall project
progress than I'?
> (As have I apparentl
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 03:49:45PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >Second, it _is_ our problem to ensure that LyX can be built (and work
> >well) on a 2 years old distribution.
>
> i didn't know that qt4 doesn't work on 2 year old distros
Neither did I, given that I am
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 01:54:03AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > You see... there is the difference, I don't plan on breaking the
> | > other frontends just because I am introducing a feature only for one
> | > o
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:12:03AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 05:59:14PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> | > On Friday 23 June 2006 17:43, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> | > > No. But xforms could be removed right away.
> | >
>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:18:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> Lars> AFAIK (and this depends on when 1
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:08:11PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> On my box (x86_64 3500+) the scroll userguide down test takes approx.
> 7 seconds with xforms. (One of my main reasons for not deleting the
> xforms frontend outright. QtX (and of use of it) is still to slow, and
> IMHO we need
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:01:16PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 20:21 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > What I mean is that I don't think that the renaming work I did can be
> > responsible for this one.
>
> IIRC it was more than renaming, otherwise I would not have mentioned
Georg Baum wrote:
> Since I don't know when I will be able to implement that, and since I want
> the current booktabs support in before the next freeze I plan to merge
> the branch back soon.
Good plan!
Jürgen
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Yes. Of course your decision is respected, but I hope you reconsider
> > it again.
>
> everybody knows that retiring on friday doesn't count...
True. Except for cyclists.
Jürgen
The booktabs support is fully functional now (except gtk frontend). One
feature is missing: Suport for left and right adjustment of \clines.
Since I don't know when I will be able to implement that, and since I want
the current booktabs support in before the next freeze I plan to merge
the bran
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Yes. Of course your decision is respected, but I hope you reconsider
it again.
everybody knows that retiring on friday doesn't count...
Michael Gerz wrote:
> The output is broken, too, but slightly different. See the screenshot.
OK. Thanks. I'll commit a similar fix to trunk, then.
> I wonder whether the qt4 frontend is broken as well...
We'll see.
Jürgen
Georg Baum wrote:
> That is sad to read. Although I did not always agree with your changes I
> think we all owe you a big THANK YOU for everything you have done for
> LyX. After all, it was a big amount of work, and the results are
> impressive.
I second that. The work you have done and also your
Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 12:07 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> I strongly disagree. I have seen many patches in the list that were much
> bigger than this one and didn't provoke the reaction my patches always
> provoke from you.
I noticed that too, and I can understand that that is frustrating. On
Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 20:21 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> What I mean is that I don't think that the renaming work I did can be
> responsible for this one.
IIRC it was more than renaming, otherwise I would not have mentioned it.
Georg
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I think we all are frustrated.
Then we have at least one thing in common.
Or maybe two: I WANT TO HAVE ABDEL BACK IN THIS PROJECTS.
Abdel, pleease!
Michael
Bo Peng wrote:
We do. Developers should be treat as ... developers, and have some
freedom of deciding things in their own domains. I mean, let Enrico
handle cygwin, let Abdel takes charge of qt4, and if there are
disputes, their votes should count as important as Lars.
We have to establish a d
> lately all my messages to you are returnded as undeliverable
I'll have to check that.Probably some site-level reverse dns testing.
> Do you have another email-address?
try [EMAIL PROTECTED] for ex.
> Shall I send the undeliverable messages again?
Yes please.
JMarc
Jean-Marc,
lately all my messages to you are returnded as undeliverable with the comment
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
SMTP module(domain inria.fr) reports:
connection with nez-perce.inria.fr is broken
Do you have another email-address? Or shall I send to lyx-devel? Sahll I send
the
32 matches
Mail list logo
