On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:57:30 +0300 Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 11:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> > JMarc
>
> Yes, this does the job. Great!
>
> - Martin
Here finally the full updated
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:35:10 +0200 Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
> > > Confirmed. Undo is b0rked for tabular multi-cell content.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, undoing the deletion of a table cell content text will
> > > result in the cell content being an *indente
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Yes, why not. Lars? Can I commit the (modified) patch?
I would have preferred waiting.
Fix a real bug and you can commit this as well ;-)
No exactly what I was hoping for...
OK, I will look for a simple bug in bugzil
Michael Gerz wrote:
> The second patch cannot be applied:
Here's a fresh one. Note, however, that you have to revert the other fix first
to get this applied.
Jürgen
Index: insettabular.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-deve
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Have to see patch first.
>
| Attached is a patch against 1.3.7cvs. I cannot make a patch against HEAD at
| the moment, because I have other pending changes in insettabular. However,
| the patch would look the same.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Have to see patch first.
Attached is a patch against 1.3.7cvs. I cannot make a patch against HEAD at
the moment, because I have other pending changes in insettabular. However,
the patch would look the same.
It turned out that I couldn't delete the automatism from BL
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | So I'm awaiting Lars' comment before going further.
>
> Is this a regression or not?
No, not as far as the indendation of optargs is concerned. On the other hand
it might be that bug 1952 (which is a regression) can be fixed by the "sane"
approach.
> Andre is afra
